Topic Index
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Username:Password:
Log In
 (Pages: 1, 2)
Knight Templar
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1257
Joined: 29 Dec 2007

I would like to comment on this interesting topic, but the title means I can't stop thinking about the princess bride.

I like deep character, if they are simple then I get the feeling that *this* is all there is and I get bored. But I have no idea what makes characters deep, or rather I don't know how to make deep characters.

broadband
Press Junketeer
Posts: 411
Joined: 15 Dec 2007

The Sorrow:
My link is to a scene from the second OVA.

Though I agree on the fact that Alucard is sadistic. He kicks an opponent's kneecap inside-out, rips his arm in half, then bites him. Nasty.

and with a huge smile on the face.

elgringobandito
Beat Writer
Posts: 156
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

juandonde:

-Edited, hit the spoiler if you want to see the image - Mods

You got put on probation for that? These nazi admins do my head in

Eyclonus
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 709
Joined: 12 Apr 2008

Does anyone here have any experience with Anita Blake novels? There pretty much challenging Twilight for the biggest author self-insertion.

Knight Templar:
I like deep character, if they are simple then I get the feeling that *this* is all there is and I get bored. But I have no idea what makes characters deep, or rather I don't know how to make deep characters.

Deep characters have something else, a complexity, a contradiction. Batman for example is simply someone who fights crime but his depth comes from the ethics of his methods and motivations; http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/e/e1/Batman_Alignment.jpg aside from bottom center and bottom right batman conforms to the archetypes in this poster, which is one way of expressing the depth of his character, although in such geeky terms of course, this is the internet.

Xhumed
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1928
Joined: 15 Jun 2008

Eyclonus:
Does anyone here have any experience with Anita Blake novels? There pretty much challenging Twilight for the biggest author self-insertion.

Yep. Does that mean the author is a colossal slag then? Gothdammit, I used to love those books...
Stupid lycanthrope sex.

Eyclonus
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 709
Joined: 12 Apr 2008

She is a colossal slag who enslaves you with sex powers. And she probably has a hell of a lot of STDs. Actually further thought would be that she provides 40-50% of the income for the local pharmacies on the sale of contraceptives.

Copter400
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2052
Joined: 14 Sep 2007

LewsTherin:

Copter400:

BlazeTheVampire:
Vampires aren't the scary creatures they used to be, and Stephenie Meyer's done a fair bit of contribution to the image of the vampire as the romantic, sexy, perfect-man.

It makes me want to write a vampire novel using old-style vampires just to spite them all. The trick is to make it read like a lovey-dovey book for a while, then bam! hit 'em with a Jack the Ripper sequence.

Hi-five. I'm thinking of starting a vampire story in that same fashion. Legendary, it would be.

Yeah! Romantic Terrorist Two-Player Prayer!

darkstone
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 935
Joined: 10 Sep 2008

alwaysrockon:
anyway nead a good vampire book read salems lot

I agree 'Salems lot was a great book, also two great short stories were written with the same name but one has nothing to do with vampires if I remember correctly.

Delta4845
Muckraker
Posts: 327
Joined: 8 Apr 2008

alwaysrockon:
metamorphisis

Kafka?
On the topic matter tho, Books that sell well have a simple Equation:

Normal Character (has a select audience) - {subtract} Normal Enviroment + {add}Extrordinary Situtaion * {multiplied} by a love intrest and thier perfect ability to be a perfect match to the main character ^ {To the power of} what mystical properties they (Character and love intrest) have *{multiply again} the number of people competing for the love intrest plus 1 / {divided} by how crazy the Author (and / or publisher) are *{multiply all that} by how much Drama is involved by media and in book

Follow this formula and you'll be writing crap for teenagers that overshadow good teenager books like "The Feed"

Ultrajoe
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 3967
Joined: 24 Apr 2008

BlazeTheVampire:
The reason the teenage girls have been lapping up Bella Swan is because they identify with her. It's not exactly a matter of character depth, it's the fact that she's a normal girl just like they are. She's clumsy as all hell, average-looking, has divorced parents, and plenty of other things about her that make her identifiable to the average teenage girl. And on top of that, she's dating

a vampire. Vampires aren't the scary creatures they used to be, and Stephenie Meyer's done a fair bit of contribution to the image of the vampire as the romantic, sexy, perfect-man.

In short, they're mostly just jealous.

But like smoking and taking drugs, the fact that we can write such things to make us feel good does not mean we should.

Books like this can exist happily, but when it is lauded above what it is at its core and becomes a substitute for true literary pursuit... it ceases to be a boon and is now a blight. Like drugs, it would not be so bad if they did not displace other more important factors of literature.

Also, there is no way you can be defending the cheapness of the Bella ploy... the Mary-Sue/Woobie (Thanks to Msh for making me go and educate myself on all of these damn terms... not) one-two punch is an insult to the readers intelligence.

In a world where people hate bratz on principle... this is allowed to exist unchallenged? Madness!

Disclaimer: In no way do i compare Twilight to Bratz, i simply find that the media has not caught onto this story is laughable... but there's less to milk from a book...

BlazeTheVampire
Press Junketeer
Posts: 469
Joined: 14 May 2008

Jobz:

The whole vampire romance thing is so overdone and cliche it makes me want to gag. They all follow the exact same format of human woman (Never a human man) meets a male vampire (Never a female vampire) and is instantly in love with him. They go on to have "hawt vampiric secks" as someone I know most eloquently put it, and the relationship is challenging because either:

A) Vamp-Boy is a afraid to hurt Human-Girl or,
B) Vamp-Boy's vampire buddies don't take kindly to him dating Human-Girl.

Whatever happened to vampires being evil, scary killers? Those were the vampires I loved, not these sissy emo kids that modern writers have turned them into.

Seriously? I see female vampires seducing men led only by lust all the freaking time. In fact, I'm rather sure that's a more solid stereotype with sexy-vampires as opposed to scary ones. That's been in place longer than our romantic notions of male vampires simply because women were always made out to be evil.

And as a side-note, I don't enjoy how much this series has been blown out of proportion either. Fangirls just need something new to cream themselves over now that Harry Potter's said and done. The Twilight series has come to a close, and the obsessively clingy fangirls will move on to writing bad fanfiction about some other series. I do enjoy Twilight and read the first book long before it was popular- they're good books, I identified with Bella (to say the least, lol. I told my father when I was younger after I'd finished Dracula that I would marry a vampire and that there was nothing he could do about it, lmao) The vampires were well done with some new twists, such as their exposure to sunlight, and the werewolf-shifters were new and offered a world besides the romantic vampire one. The only thing that really irked me was the first two parts of the last book- I felt let down, like the ending should've been more epic than this, but Part 3 delivered.

blank0000
Beat Writer
Posts: 141
Joined: 3 Oct 2007

WhitemageofDOOM:
The problem with deep characters is that humans aren't deep.
Were simple creatures with simple desires. So trying to find depth in a shallow pool isn't going to work.

I guess I can see where your coming from, but I disagree and offer you a rebuttal!

The human mind is capable of many things, everyday we transition between emotions based on how we see the world and how we react to it. To say that all humanity is based on simple desires seems like a fairly narrow way to view the world.

On the surface, we can shove off anything ANYTHING with a simple answer, however, the who what and why behind these simple answers can be in themselves very "deep".

I think thats one of the biggest huddles with creating a genuine character, often we want to be able to see into their thoughts, but too often authors fail to do this. Instead an attempt to create intreige is used, based off very primitive emotions such as "anger, pain, rage, ect" this KILLs a charecter in my opinion, because when this strategy is used it often doesnt add the layer of dept the author is looking for and instead leads to more and more....and more, cliches "check some writting forums, you'll get an idea of what i'm going for".

xitel
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 704
Joined: 13 Aug 2008

I think people keep harping on new characters that keep coming out because, after thousands of years of storytelling, it is safe to say that almost all of the good ideas have been used, most to the point of being beyond cliche. For me, I've stopped expecting characters to be deep. Instead, I prefer a story with a deep setting, one with a developed background. For example, one of the reasons I like Mass Effect is because they developed an entire universe as a setting, with fully-developed details. They even describe how the guns fire without running out of ammo, and the exact details behind how the shields work. That is what I consider to be deep. It is extremely difficult to create a fully fleshed out character and background without using an overly-long flashback, which most people consider to be annoying. Another example of deep settings would have to be Forgotten Realms, but that has gotten far more deep as it's been around a long time.

blank0000
Beat Writer
Posts: 141
Joined: 3 Oct 2007

BlazeTheVampire:

Jobz:

Whatever happened to vampires being evil, scary killers? Those were the vampires I loved, not these sissy emo kids that modern writers have turned them into.

.

well it starts with one eager witters struggle to be original...to show the "all together now...OTHER SIDE" of a popular staple in some sort of area or another, it appeals to those looking for something new and intriguing.......it ends with bad spin-offs

I can understand not making a vampire evil, giving them a back story and what not, hell I was making a sort of mock-parody-esk thingy up in my mind aboot such things " Dracuals the social equivalent of the guy from the 700 club, zombies are a sort of children toy for parties, ect"

but we live in an age where being over the top and impulsive is "hip" with the kids. Mix in emo drama and proven source material, and you will have a fad.......a horrible.......horrible fad.

Eyclonus
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 709
Joined: 12 Apr 2008

blank0000:
but we live in an age where being over the top and impulsive is "hip" with the kids. Mix in emo drama and proven source material, and you will have a fad.......a horrible.......horrible fad.

Arrrgh Emo Batman!?! Robin cutting himself?! Arrggh! bad mental image.

Fraser.J.A
Muckraker
Posts: 265
Joined: 17 May 2007

You use that phrase in the title. I do not think it relates to the topic like you think it does.

The Sorrow
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 903
Joined: 27 Jan 2008

Fraser.J.A:
You use that phrase in the title. I do not think it relates to the topic like you think it does.

"What does the word deep mean to others?" is what I'm asking.

Lord Krunk
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2501
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Copter400:

BlazeTheVampire:
Vampires aren't the scary creatures they used to be, and Stephenie Meyer's done a fair bit of contribution to the image of the vampire as the romantic, sexy, perfect-man.

It makes me want to write a vampire novel using old-style vampires just to spite them all. The trick is to make it read like a lovey-dovey book for a while, then bam! hit 'em with a Jack the Ripper sequence.

Or one where there's this vampire who all the girls fall in love with, but he eats them all.

I mean, vampires are vampires. They're not supposed to be lovey-dovey watchers in the night, they're supposed to be the garlic fearing, blood-sucking horrors, courtesy of the Brothers Grimm (I think).

They're a bedtime story to warn the kids not to go outside in the middle of the night, not figures of a teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

Well, enough derailing.

I think a deep character is one you can relate to. One whose actions would be your own, if you were in that situation.

Amnestic
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2934
Joined: 22 Aug 2008

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Lord Krunk
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2501
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

They don't.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Amnestic
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2934
Joined: 22 Aug 2008

Lord Krunk:

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

They don't.

That's what I'm trying to say.

But that doesn't make sense...if nothing else, how do the vampires in Buffy and Angel get it up then :( *sigh* poor impotent James Marsters and David Boreanaz.

Lord Krunk
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2501
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Wait a second...

Why are we talking about the anatomy of a vampire?

They don't exist, you do realise.

Amnestic
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2934
Joined: 22 Aug 2008

Lord Krunk:
Wait a second...

Why are we talking about the anatomy of a vampire?

They don't exist, you do realise.

What? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Heh. I never get tired of posting that link.

I just find it funny that the anatomy of a vampire makes giant glaring plotholes in all of this wishy-washy vampire eroticism. Well, and Buffy and Angel.

Lord Krunk
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2501
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Amnestic:

Lord Krunk:
Wait a second...

Why are we talking about the anatomy of a vampire?

They don't exist, you do realise.

What? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Heh. I never get tired of posting that link.

I just find it funny that the anatomy of a vampire makes giant glaring plotholes in all of this wishy-washy vampire eroticism. Well, and Buffy and Angel.

Never seen them.

And by the way, Darth Vader doing a Frankenstein? I think you're on to something.

The missing link? [/derailment]

ThaBenMan
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1030
Joined: 6 Mar 2008

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Well, I think that the Vampire: The Masquerade roleplaying game has a pretty good explanation for this. The sorts of vampires that seduce their prey by being attractive have more humanity (a higher Humanity rating, stats-wise), and so they can pass for being human easier. They can take their blood and through concentrating, make their bodies do "human" things - they can give themselves a more healthy-looking complexion, pretend to eat food when normally it would make them sick, and even "get it up" when they need to. Think of it like a predator that has special mechanisms to allow it to get close to it's prey.

And apologies to the TC for this derailment.

ward.
Beat Writer
Posts: 175
Joined: 6 Aug 2008

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Rigor mortise

The Sorrow
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 903
Joined: 27 Jan 2008

ward.:

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Rigor mortise

One problem: Lil' Johnny isn't a muscle. It won't stiffen in death.

broadband
Press Junketeer
Posts: 411
Joined: 15 Dec 2007

well, im not sure but... some powerful vampires are capable of shape shift no? maybe they use it somehow

Copter400
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2052
Joined: 14 Sep 2007

The Sorrow:

ward.:

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Rigor mortise

One problem: Lil' Johnny isn't a muscle. It won't stiffen in death.

Man, this thread is getting disturbing.

LewsTherin
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1126
Joined: 22 Jun 2008

Copter400:

The Sorrow:

ward.:

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

Rigor mortise

One problem: Lil' Johnny isn't a muscle. It won't stiffen in death.

Man, this thread is getting disturbing.

Yes. Yes it is.

Isn't it great? :D

smallharmlesskitten
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2260
Joined: 3 Apr 2008

every thread get's disturbing eventually

Xhumed
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1928
Joined: 15 Jun 2008

Amnestic:

teenage girl's unfulfillable desires.

I never got that really. As I understand it, vampires don't have heartbeats, right? So how do they, you know, get the blood pumping?

For the sex, I mean.

They feed, apparently, at least in the Anita Blake books (otherwise their hearts don't beat, they have no blood pressure and low body temperature.)
Bram Stoker Ann Rice side-stepped it by making feeding a substitute for sex.

 (Pages: 1, 2)
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

You must be logged in to post.
Username:  
Password: