Topic Index
Why all the hate on Christianity?

Username:Password:
Log In
 (Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 29)
LeChuck99
Paperboy
Posts: 11
Joined: 4 Sep 2008

Making fun of a devoted christian is like making fun of a child for believing in santa claus.

its easy and fun.

internutt
Muckraker
Posts: 278
Joined: 27 Aug 2008

Just a random thought. Why is Christianity considered a Western religion? Is it because of its popularity?

It was started by Israelis two thousand odd years ago. Like most religions it started in the Middle East, hardly Western now is it?

I understand the hate on Christianity really. I do not like the American extremists at all. I am also not fond of JWs, but that is a personal gripe.

Amnestic
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2804
Joined: 22 Aug 2008

Just a random thought. Why is Christianity considered a Western religion? Is it because of its popularity?

Because most of the followers are located in Western countries these days. S'about it really.

Beowulf DW
Press Junketeer
Posts: 386
Joined: 12 Jul 2008

internutt:

Beowulf DW:
I'd just like to clarify some things here.

True Christians:
" Do not believe that they're the only ones who will enter heaven

This is the only part I disagree with about your post. Christians certainly are not the only ones going into heaven, the Israeli who truly followed God before he sent His son shall be in heaven as well.

When Jesus came that was God's major victory plan fulfilled. Accepting Jesus, the perfect sacrifice, as your savior is the only way for us to go to heaven. Good deeds do not get us there. Might sound harsh n all, but the wages of sin is death and all that.

People do not like being told that if they don't do x they can't get y. If you don't finish your homework you can't watch TV, etc. It is a teaching in Christianity. Of course we are not meant to go all Zealot on someone to force them into a decision, that is wrong. We have free will to chose Jesus, we can't force someone into that choice.

God is love, yet God is also Justice, if we do not accept his mercy (note: Jesus) why should we be allowed into the paradise He made?

Catholic dogma states that the Holy Spirit leads the souls of the followers of other ideologies to heaven.

Once again, Jesus himself said that he has sheep that do not belong to his fold.

Who do you think is the true follower of Christ? A Christian who helps his fellow man because he wants his soul to enter heaven, or the Atheist who helps his fellow man simply out of the goodness of his heart, with no thought of reward in this life or whatever may come after?

Actions speak louder than words. Those who have good souls simply cannot enter hell. They must be accepted into purgatory if not immediately into heaven.

A good person is a good person; it doesn't matter if you're a Christian or not.

EDIT: @Amnestic

There is no set criteria for being a Scotsman (other than heritage). There are set rules and guidelines that define what a true Christian is. As such, true Christians are not an impossibility.

PedroSteckecilo
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2353
Joined: 7 Feb 2008

Amnestic:

Just a random thought. Why is Christianity considered a Western religion? Is it because of its popularity?

Because most of the followers are located in Western countries these days. S'about it really.

It's called a Western Religion because it, along with Judaism, have been intrinsically the linked with Western Culture for around 2,000 years, whereas Buddhism, Islam, Taoism and such have primarily influenced Eastern Cultures.

Up until recently, Western Society was REFERED to as Christian Society, the two are inexplicably linked, you could not really concieve of western civilization as we know it without the influence of christianity.

PedroSteckecilo
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2353
Joined: 7 Feb 2008

LeChuck99:
Making fun of a devoted christian is like making fun of a child for believing in santa claus.

its easy and fun.

It's not quite as simple as that, "Santa Clause" isn't like God, as he does not have 2,000 years of indoctrination behind him. As well...

A child cannot outlaw a womans right to choose, declare homosexuality a crime, deny people their right to die, commit acts of horrible persecution and genocide on a mass scale etc.

There's no DANGER in believing in Santa Clause, since I've never seen anyone Kill in the name of Santa Clause.

hem dazon 90
Muckraker
Posts: 284
Joined: 12 Aug 2008

i dont get it either.

s-l-u-g
Copy Clerk
Posts: 99
Joined: 5 Sep 2008

We'll you (christians, not specifically you) do kinda deserve it considering all that they've done to the people of the world...

Forcing them to join the religion or perish, burning them because they didn't follow christian rules, telling people not to have sex [which in a way surely must be against Yahweh, wouldn't s/he want their creature to thrive rather they die/dry out?" and also, remember it's usually the christians to attack other religions/governments/peoples/societies/cities/children/pets/people/anything thats living/anything thats dead/everything.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

Beowulf DW:
I'd just like to clarify some things here.
True Christians:

...

" Do not believe that they're the only ones who will enter heaven

...

Uhh, that's not true. I'm not sure which Bible you're reading, but it's made perfectly clear in scripture that only those who seek forgiveness from Christ will be allowed to 'enter heaven'. I'm not a fan of the phrase 'enter heaven', but this isn't a theology debate.

Now if you're referring to people who didn't know about Christ, had no chance to know about Christ, lived across the world when Christ was here, lived before Christ, etc. Well I can't say as I'm not God.

siege_1302:

Because you deserve it. Christianity is evil. As are the other religions you mentioned, but we live in generally western countries so they aren't as prominent.

Even though I love your blind hate, keep it out of this thread. One person was banned for a few days because of bombarding this thread with flame-like hate, so consider this a friendly 'ease up there home-slice'.

internutt
Muckraker
Posts: 278
Joined: 27 Aug 2008

Beowulf DW:

Actions speak louder than words. Those who have good souls simply cannot enter hell. They must be accepted into purgatory if not immediately into heaven.

A good person is a good person; it doesn't matter if you're a Christian or not.

True, a good person is a good person, but good deeds to not get you into heaven, much like a murderer is not forgiven of their life sentance because they once helped an old lady across the street in their youth.

I never saw Purgatory as a teaching from the bible, moreso Catholic superstition (I am aware of bible verses that seem to support purgatory, but I think they are merely out of context as to what is being said). There are two possible destinations, heaven and hell. We have this life to decide to chose Christ. Should a person accept Jesus as their savior that is the only price for heaven, Christians do not suffer for their sins since Jesus was the payment for them.

Good debate by the way everyone. Makes you think of course. Believe what you want to believe of course, but debating is a good thing to engage in once in a while!

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

internutt:

Beowulf DW:

Actions speak louder than words. Those who have good souls simply cannot enter hell. They must be accepted into purgatory if not immediately into heaven.

A good person is a good person; it doesn't matter if you're a Christian or not.

True, a good person is a good person, but good deeds to not get you into heaven, much like a murderer is not forgiven of their life sentance because they once helped an old lady across the street in their youth.

I never saw Purgatory as a teaching from the bible, moreso Catholic superstition (I am aware of bible verses that seem to support purgatory, but I think they are merely out of context as to what is being said). There are two possible destinations, heaven and hell. We have this life to decide to chose Christ. Should a person accept Jesus as their savior that is the only price for heaven, Christians do not suffer for their sins since Jesus was the payment for them.

Good debate by the way everyone. Makes you think of course. Believe what you want to believe of course, but debating is a good thing to engage in once in a while!

As much I love to disagree with Catholics in their view of 'purgatory', and especially when one says that 'Those who have good souls simply cannot enter hell' which is completely contrary to scripture...but let's remember to keep this thread on topic, eh?

SecretTacoNinja
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 739
Joined: 8 Jul 2008

Can I say something? Because I want an opinion from smart people.

Okay:
I heard in Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion that there was a mistranslation in the Bible when they were converting it into a different language that confused two words, I think it was the Arabic(?) word for 'maiden' and the Greek word for 'virgin'. This pretty much told me that it proved the 'Virgin' Mary wasn't a virgin and the whole story of Jesus being the son of God was a myth.

Anyone have anything to say? Because this is huge if it's true.

snowplow
BANNED
Posts: 453
Joined: 12 Sep 2008

SecretTacoNinja:
Can I say something? Because I want an opinion from smart people.

Okay:
I heard in Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion that there was a mistranslation in the Bible when they were converting it into a different language that confused two words, I think it was the Arabic(?) word for 'maiden' and the Greek word for 'virgin'. This pretty much told me that it proved the 'Virgin' Mary wasn't a virgin and the whole story of Jesus being the son of God was a myth.

Anyone have anything to say? Because this is huge if it's true.

Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, and he doesn't know hebrew OR greek. AFAIK such a "mistranslation" doesn't exist. Not saying that I know, but I do know a person (priest) who does. Happens to be a linguist.

User was banned for: Proposition 8, sparks anger, and threats.. (14 days)
internutt
Muckraker
Posts: 278
Joined: 27 Aug 2008

SecretTacoNinja:
Can I say something? Because I want an opinion from smart people.

Okay:
I heard in Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion that there was a mistranslation in the Bible when they were converting it into a different language that confused two words, I think it was the Arabic(?) word for 'maiden' and the Greek word for 'virgin'. This pretty much told me that it proved the 'Virgin' Mary wasn't a virgin and the whole story of Jesus being the son of God was a myth.

Anyone have anything to say? Because this is huge if it's true.

Quite honestly the God delusion was simply an angry rant, written to make the reader angry. Not really a true analysis on anything. Its true there were some mistranslations in the first leap into English, some words in English are far too simple than their Greek or Hebrew meanings, rest assured there are better translations these days than that of the old English editions of the bible. There are many words for love in Greece describing physical love and love for an object or family member, but English only has love.

On topic: The disagreements within Christianity itself seems to be another reason as to the hate on Christianity. Different churches follow different teachings so it can confuse more about what the 'true' teaching is. But humans will always disagree on something. The important belief is in Jesus being the way to heaven and accepting him. All others like infant baptism aren't too important and can be debated for personal preference.

People want to hear what they want to hear, nothing new there.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

SecretTacoNinja:
Can I say something? Because I want an opinion from smart people.

Okay:
I heard in Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion that there was a mistranslation in the Bible when they were converting it into a different language that confused two words, I think it was the Arabic(?) word for 'maiden' and the Greek word for 'virgin'. This pretty much told me that it proved the 'Virgin' Mary wasn't a virgin and the whole story of Jesus being the son of God was a myth.

Anyone have anything to say? Because this is huge if it's true.

First of all: Take anything Richard Dawkins says with a bucket of salt. For all the people that say 'Christians say a bunch of stuff without really knowing' or 'Believing something to fit their agenda', Richard Dawkins is the same way for militant atheists. He would love nothing more then to see the eradication of religion, and therefore has his reasons to misrepresent anything he 'researches'.

And before anyone says 'Christianity does that too!', I know people think that. I'm just raising the point that if 'militant Christians' would do something like that, don't expect Dawkins to be any different.

If it WAS Arabic he said, then he's flat out wrong since the scriptures weren't written in Arabic. If he's talking Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic, then I think it's funny that they 'just discovered this' when people (I.E. Non-Christians) have been studying the Bible in it's original languages for decades and no-one has brought this up. This is just like the 'Book of Judas' crap. It's crap.

Now please! Thread on topic! There have been great responses! Let's keep those coming.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

internutt:

On topic: The disagreements within Christianity itself seems to be another reason as to the hate on Christianity. Different churches follow different teachings so it can confuse more about what the 'true' teaching is. But humans will always disagree on something. The important belief is in Jesus being the way to heaven and accepting him. All others like infant baptism aren't too important and can be debated for personal preference.

Well said. I often have people telling me they don't believe when so many Christians argue amongst each other over the most ridiculous things (Infant baptism, dancing, worship styles, what is appropriate to wear to church, tattoos, instruments in church, etc.). The Christian church will soon have to admit that we need unity, not uniformity, if we are going to survive the next few generations.

Good post.

The_root_of_all_evil
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4579
Joined: 13 Feb 2008

Bucket of Salt? I'd take it with the whole of Lot's wife.

And where does he get off using my name to attack Christianity, slander I tell you!

werepossum
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1367
Joined: 12 Sep 2007

Baby Tea:
SNIP
As much I love to disagree with Catholics in their view of 'purgatory', and especially when one says that 'Those who have good souls simply cannot enter hell' which is completely contrary to scripture...but let's remember to keep this thread on topic, eh?

Purgatory is a Catholic construction to settle a contradiction in Catholic dogma - you can't go to Heaven until you've been forgiven for your sins, which requires a priest, so you suffer in Purgatory until you've made up for your un-confessed and un-atoned sins. I kind of liked the idea myself, the idea of suffering for a bit before entering Heaven. Kind of punishing myself I guess. But I believe it's been officially dropped together with Limbo.

The main problem I have with Christian-bashing is that I have to fund it. In the unlikely event that you're unable to find someone to pay you to put a crucifix in a jar of urine (which fails my art test because I could do it) or recreate The Madonna in elephant dung, why should I have to fund it? The market has already established that your art is worthless. If an "artist" put the AIDS quilt in a jar (well, a big jar) of urine there would be hell to pay, not government subsidies. Similarly, art that is hateful to Muslims or Buddhists or Wiccans are not allowed in government-supported institutes. So why is it that Christian-hating art must not only be tolerated, but subsidized?

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

The_root_of_all_evil:
Bucket of Salt? I'd take it with the whole of Lot's wife.

Oh my word. That would probably be the funniest Bible-based joke I've ever heard! Seriously, I'm cracking up. Brilliant. I'm totally using that sometime.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

werepossum:

The main problem I have with Christian-bashing is that I have to fund it. In the unlikely event that you're unable to find someone to pay you to put a crucifix in a jar of urine (which fails my art test because I could do it) or recreate The Madonna in elephant dung, why should I have to fund it? The market has already established that your art is worthless. If an "artist" put the AIDS quilt in a jar (well, a big jar) of urine there would be hell to pay, not government subsidies. Similarly, art that is hateful to Muslims or Buddhists or Wiccans are not allowed in government-supported institutes. So why is it that Christian-hating art must not only be tolerated, but subsidized?

Well said! I certainly won't deny that other religions have had their own hardships (Some past, some ever present), you really don't see stuff like that against other religions.

Good post.

siege_1302
Copy Clerk
Posts: 92
Joined: 17 Jul 2008

Baby Tea:

First of all: Take anything Richard Dawkins says with a bucket of salt. For all the people that say 'Christians say a bunch of stuff without really knowing' or 'Believing something to fit their agenda', Richard Dawkins is the same way for militant atheists. He would love nothing more then to see the eradication of religion, and therefore has his reasons to misrepresent anything he 'researches'.

Whilst it's always a plus point to be critical of anything and everything you read or hear, having read Dawkins (not just The God Delusion, also his biology stuff), I think he knows what he's doing when he talks about evolution. And on the whole his research is pretty accurate. The arguments he makes are pretty well reasoned. I agree, some of the stuff about mistranslations of scripture is somewhat shaky, but it's enough to make you think "if we can't agree it's a translation or mistranslation, then there's room for doubt in supposedly 'divine' texts".
Sure he has his own agenda. He's allowed that.
And personally, I agree with it. We should get rid of all religion, as soon as possible. It's not good for mankind, really.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

siege_1302:

...We should get rid of all religion, as soon as possible. It's not good for mankind, really.

This argument always seems so stale to me. It's like almost every atheist I meet is a broken record, saying that 'Religion is bad. Religion causes all these bad things'.

If you want to say about how Christianity is this evil bad thing because of the crusades, or the inquisition, or because of how 'they all' hate everyone who isn't Christian: I'd say you're wrong. The message of Christ would decry all of those things, not condone (Or endorse) them. You can't trace any of those terrible acts to the message of Christ. The buck stops at the people who USE a good message to their own ends.

Besides, I can just point to Stalin and his Death Squads, or Hitler (NOT Christian. Debate that with me in private messages if you must, but not here), and say that humanism and atheism is evil.

What is the tying link? Humanity. Humanity does evil things.

Now PLEASE let's keep this on topic. Good posts thus far! Message me if you wanna debate or discuss or question or whatever. Or start your own thread.

bleachigo10
Beat Writer
Posts: 188
Joined: 4 Jun 2008

Baby Tea:
So why all the hate on Christianity?

you honestly have 2 ask christians are always calling people godless hethens and such trying to force there religion on people

here is an example: in texas its illegal for atheists to testify in court
wtf

Drednought1
Copy Clerk
Posts: 65
Joined: 3 Sep 2008

As im sure many people have said before, its because that Chiristianity is so in the spotlight that its become just like another bit of life thats there to be made fun of. If you will its lost some of the religious protection that it used to have.

Plus in my opinion, its lack of ability to defend itself aginst other peoples views, and its inability to move with the times has opened it up to even more abuse.

Baby Tea
Press Junketeer
Posts: 443
Joined: 18 Sep 2008

bleachigo10:

you honestly have 2 ask christians are always calling people godless hethens and such trying to force there religion on people

here is an example: in texas its illegal for atheists to testify in court
wtf

First off, your example? How does that have anything to do with Christianity? Where in the Bible does it say 'And ye atheist shall not testify in the courts'? If you have a problem with Texas law, take it up with Texas.

And while I can concede that some Christians can be over-zealous in their actions and words, that still doesn't have to do with Christianity. Why not? Because the message of Christ would say that the way they're acting is wrong. If someone is contradicting their own beliefs, is it the fault of the worldview, or the person claiming to follow it?

Drednought1:
...Plus in my opinion, its lack of ability to defend itself aginst other peoples views, and its inability to move with the times has opened it up to even more abuse.

I'd love to discuss with you how Christianity certainly doesn't have 'the lack of ability to defend itself against other peoples views'. I could also point out flaws with the idea that a worldview must change or 'move' with the times (I'm assuming you mean fundamentally), but that's for private messages.

AmericanWarMachine
Copy Clerk
Posts: 84
Joined: 7 Sep 2008

maybe this could be why...

bleachigo10
Beat Writer
Posts: 188
Joined: 4 Jun 2008

the point of my example was that atheists probably wouldnt even get a trail down there so if they were accused of a crime they didnt comit they would just go ahead and get the chair

Jumplion
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2813
Joined: 10 Mar 2008

(Please note, I have not read any previous statements in this thread. So basically, I'm ignoring everyone else and putting my opinion here)

Why should Christianity be left untouched? "Leave no stone unturned" as they say!

I've seen people make fun of Judaism, Buddah, Islam, Muslim, Blacks, Whites, the Mayans and Indians, and tons of other stuff. Most of the time it's for shits and giggles, other times it's because the guy's being a jackass, but it's all fair game.

What, should Christianity have a special permit to not be made fun of? I say bullshivism!

I don't intend this to sound rude or hating or anything, if it comes off like that then I am sorry but I did not intend to offend anyone.

siege_1302
Copy Clerk
Posts: 92
Joined: 17 Jul 2008

Baby Tea:
And while I can concede that some Christians can be over-zealous in their actions and words, that still doesn't have to do with Christianity. Why not? Because the message of Christ would say that the way they're acting is wrong. If someone is contradicting their own beliefs, is it the fault of the worldview, or the person claiming to follow it?

So...there's nothing wrong with Christianity, just the people who practice it? So people shouldn't practice Christianity?

A bit like communism then: great in theory, not so good in practice.

Smber2c
Anonymous Source
Posts: 2
Joined: 8 Jul 2008

werepossum:

Purgatory is a Catholic construction to settle a contradiction in Catholic dogma - you can't go to Heaven until you've been forgiven for your sins, which requires a priest, so you suffer in Purgatory until you've made up for your un-confessed and un-atoned sins. I kind of liked the idea myself, the idea of suffering for a bit before entering Heaven. Kind of punishing myself I guess. But I believe it's been officially dropped together with Limbo.

Couple things wrong here: 1. Catholic dogma have no contradictions, but people who don't understand Catholic teaching think it does. Everyone pretends that faith must be simple if it's true...which really makes no sense. How many pages is the Bible? Why didn't God or Jesus just hand our copied of the 10 commandments and call it a day?

2. Forgiveness of sins doesn't require a priest by