Topic Index
Poll: Eating Meat, Is It Barbaric?


Is eating meat barbaric?
Yes
5.9% (37)
5.9% (37)
No
94.1% (588)
94.1% (588)
Username:Password:
Log In
 (Pages: 1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 35)
killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

"Doesn't change the fact that it doesn't tie any emotions to pain without a brain. It feels pain, but it's indifferent to it."

So now youre falling back to a position on emotion. How do you gage the emotion?

A mental state that arises spontaneously rather than through conscious effort and is often accompanied by physiological changes; a feeling: the emotions of joy, sorrow, reverence, hate, and love.

How does a flower feel when it opens to the sun? If it could speak, perhaps it would be joy.

Eggo
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2876
Joined: 21 Aug 2008

snowplow:
They're nerves though. If they don't exist, injury can't be properly interpreted.

Actually...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allodynia#Types

snowplow:
That's actually the condition I had in mind when I was posting, except I'd take it a step further and remove any perception of sense or awareness. No pain, no feelings, no problem.

That animal wouldn't survive to even 10% of its normal life expectancy though.

Imitation Saccharin
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1011
Joined: 1 Dec 2007

snowplow:

Again, you're arguing with the wrong person here.

So your entire post was a poorly-thought-out nitpick?

Shivari
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1126
Joined: 17 Jun 2008

Eggo:
Well then you'll have to hunker down, do your homework, and figure out how to prove me wrong.

You're comparing something that is harmful some of the time to something that is harmful all of the time. There are no cases where the cow gives consent. One always ends in death, the other doesn't. The points aren't as connected as you seem to think they are.

Indifferent? Insect larvae moving away from a noxious stimulus is the farthest thing possible from an indifferent response.

You better get on that homework :p

It doesn't have a brain so it's not attributing feelings to the pain.

GCM
Beat Writer
Posts: 145
Joined: 2 Sep 2008

Well, we all know anyways that the only reason we don't eat humans is because it tastes lousy.

PurpleRain
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4245
Joined: 2 Dec 2007

killerap85:
How does a flower feel when it opens to the sun? If it could speak, perhaps it would be joy.

Sigh. I'll end this here.

A flower would open to the sun to LIVE! You now that thing that living things do to not die.

Flowers have no brains! Fact! None! When they open their pettles they do that living thing (see above). I don't think it goes,
"My what a beautiful day! Boy am I ever so happy! Feed me sun! Come all ye little bees! Spread my pollin!"

No, it just does these things to live without narey a thought... cause it has no brain!

werepossum
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1367
Joined: 12 Sep 2007

Eggo:
SNIP
Your science teacher must not be very good then:

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960982207022683
http://www.sdbonline.org/fly/aimorph/cns.htm
http://www.citeulike.org/user/bangyuzhou/article/922310

Nor must have been the trained scientist!

And if you're wondering about my credentials, I'm a senior studying central nervous systems neuroscience at the Johns Hopkins University and researching music and neuroscience over at our medical school.

I did an edit, but the thread passed me by. Plants also have pain responses, and they've been studied to some extent. Here's some interesting links.

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980702112426data_trunc_sys.shtml
http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/plantbio/1994-December/004565.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Life_of_Plants
http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/080918-plant-aspirin.html
http://www.livescience.com/animals/071008-plants-communicate.html

Plants don't have nervous systems like we do, of course; their pain signals are sent via either purely chemical signals or electro-chemical signals without a dedicated network. And of course their pain signals have a different function. Since most plants have very limited ability to recoil from pain, the signals instead trigger the plant's defense systems, to attempt to defend itself from the cause of the pain.

So rest assured that the broccoli you're crunching is screaming as loud as it can - you just can't hear it.

Eggo
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2876
Joined: 21 Aug 2008

Shivari:
You're comparing something that is harmful some of the time to something that is harmful all of the time.

That's only if you consider animals to enjoy the same cognitive capabilities as humans.

If that's the case, I suggest burying your nose into psychology and cognitive and systems neuroscience textbooks for the next couple years before responding.

Shivari:
There are no cases where the cow gives consent. One always ends in death, the other doesn't. The points aren't as connected as you seem to think they are.

How can a cow give consent if it has no concept of consent?

Shivari:
It doesn't have a brain so it's not attributing feelings to the pain.

image

Drosophila brain says hello.

And does this mean it's perfectly okay to eat animals (or humans for that matter) who have had congenital insensitivity to pain genetically induced?

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

PurpleRain:

killerap85:
How does a flower feel when it opens to the sun? If it could speak, perhaps it would be joy.

Sigh. I'll end this here.

A flower would open to the sun to LIVE! You now that thing that living things do to not die.

Flowers have no brains! Fact! None! When they open their pettles they do that living thing (see above). I don't think it goes,
"My what a beautiful day! Boy am I ever so happy! Feed me sun! Come all ye little bees! Spread my pollin!"

No, it just does these things to live without narey a thought... cause it has no brain!

You cannt gage any living thing based on how you feel. Not even people. It only gets more foolish the further away from people you go. Not even a dog would go, ""My what a beautiful day! Boy am I ever so happy!" It might just wag its tail.

Neither will a cow or an ant or any living thing.

You are arguing with shiv on emotion.

How do you gage ANY animals emotion? we can hardly do it with people

Shivari
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1126
Joined: 17 Jun 2008

Eggo:
That's only if you consider animals to enjoy the same cognitive capabilities as humans.

If that's the case, I suggest burying your nose into psychology and cognitive and systems neuroscience textbooks for the next couple years before responding.

I never said I did think that, but how is killing an animal not causing it harm?

If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

Drosophila brain says hello.

Ok, so what does that fly have to do with plants?

snowplow
Press Junketeer
Posts: 460
Joined: 12 Sep 2008

Imitation Saccharin :

So your entire post was a poorly-thought-out nitpick?

I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. You responded to my post which was aimed at the OP, or vegans in general. That was the post with the insects. If animals have an imaginary right to live then so do insects. and plants. Parasites also. Trematodes, ticks, mistletoe, etc. Before that you were talking about plants having feelings, which is fine, except I don't care. If I did, I wouldn't step on them.

Please explain your point, because as far as I can tell you don't have one.

Eggo:

Actually...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allodynia#Types

ok, you're obviously more knowledgeable than me. However, that link is also in regards to senses and nerves, if I read it correctly. In my imaginary scenario, such things are removed.

That animal wouldn't survive to even 10% of its normal life expectancy though.

When breeding meat for the purpose of consumption the only required life expectancy is one that'll get the animal to its highest level of meat quantity and quality. Artificially keeping it alive and forcefeeding it is fine.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

"Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

Thats just it. It WONT be. Thats what YOU would think. No doubt that the pig would acknowledge it and respond to the best of its ability. So would a plant.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

Youre Anthropomorphising

werepossum
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1367
Joined: 12 Sep 2007

Shivari:
SNIP
If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"
SNIP

Having been around pigs more than I would like, I can guarantee you the pig will be thinking no such thing. It will be thinking "PAIN!" and "PROBLEMS WALKING!" That's about a pig's limit. They are smart and sociable for animals; they aren't people.

More to the point, if it's alright to kill plants and insects because they aren't aware of it, shouldn't it also be okay to kill animals when they're asleep?

Imitation Saccharin
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1011
Joined: 1 Dec 2007

snowplow:

Please explain your point, because as far as I can tell you don't have one.

You quote my post then say you are arguing with the OP.

Fuck it, go be crazy on your own time. I'm getting a drink.

paulgruberman
Web Developer
Posts: 237
Joined: 6 Jun 2007

Shivari:

Plants don't feel pain, they don't have feelings. If you kick a plant it doesn't get scared, if you kicked a dog it would put its tail in between its legs and lower its body. Plants may be living, but its not going to feel anything from its death.

Pain is the indicator of damage and serves as a warning to the recepient. Protective measures to avoid pain are not limited to animals.
I give you this:
http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/plantbio/1994-December/004565.html
and this:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/08/980806090010.htm
as starter 'food for thought'.

For more depth, here's a nice study chock full of headache-enducing scientific terms that covers nervous systems and communication (yes, communication) in plants.
http://ds9.botanik.uni-bonn.de/zellbio/AG-Baluska-Volkmann/plantneuro/pdf/NeuroPlantTZ-Biologia.pdf

So unless you're prepared to ignore the evidence, the pain line on the morally edibile scale is arbitrary.

snowplow
Press Junketeer
Posts: 460
Joined: 12 Sep 2008

Imitation Saccharin :

snowplow:

Please explain your point, because as far as I can tell you don't have one.

You quote my post then say you are arguing with the OP.

Fuck it, go be crazy on your own time. I'm getting a drink.

Buddy, I quoted you when talking about plants. My post with insects did NOT quote you. That one was directed at the OP.

Stop mixing several distinct posts together.

Duke Machine
Copy Clerk
Posts: 69
Joined: 27 Aug 2008

Shivari:
If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

Do you honestly believe that an animal is going to process information like that? An animal doesn't comprehend things, it dosen't look deeper into things, it doesn't think like a human being, so how can you be arguing that we should basically treat them like human beings, in the way that it should be a crime to kill even one?

Eggo
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2876
Joined: 21 Aug 2008

Shivari:
I never said I did think that, but how is killing an animal not causing it harm?

I can't think of any animals which we eat in modern society that have the cognitive capabilities to understand and possibly demand a right and consent to life. Thus, there's no harm done.

Shivari:
If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

You're anthropomorphizing again.

Ok, so what does that fly have to do with plants?

Err, the conversation that I initiated and which you responded to (with which I responded to with the picture of a Drosophila brain) was about insects.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

pwned?

/thread?

paulgruberman
Web Developer
Posts: 237
Joined: 6 Jun 2007

Ok everyone, the thread is moving pretty quickly, quotes are flying back and forth, signals are getting mixed, and tempers may be getting flared. We don't need banning and probations messing up this gem of a discussion, so if you need to, take a break, go gank some n00bs online perhaps, and come back and see how things have progressed. Don't worry about instantly replying to posts, it's just not worth the extra stress.

Always remember to keep things civil.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

Dont listen to him shiv. He just wants you to give up.

Shivari
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1126
Joined: 17 Jun 2008

Eggo:

Shivari:
I never said I did think that, but how is killing an animal not causing it harm?

I can't think of any animals which we eat in modern society that have the cognitive capabilities to understand and possibly demand a right and consent to life. Thus, there's no harm done.

So the pain it feels doesn't matter simply because it's not as intelligent as us?

Shivari:
If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

You're anthropomorphizing again.

Well yeah, but it will still very much feel the pain and be afraid of you from then on. And it sure wouldn't be happy. I know it's not going to actually think those words.

Err, the conversation that I initiated and which you responded to (with which I responded to with the picture of a Drosophila brain) was about insects.

Ahh, I overlooked that. I wasn't talking about insects, I was talking about plants, which do not have brains.

paulgruberman:
So unless you're prepared to ignore the evidence, the pain line on the morally edibile scale is arbitrary.

Plants feel pain, I've already admitted that. But they don't have a brain and don't have feelings attributed to the pain. For them it's just pain, it won't make them sad.

Oh, and killerap85, please stop trolling, thanks.

Anyways, it's almost 4 AM here, I have to get some sleep.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

Shivari:

Eggo:

Shivari:
I never said I did think that, but how is killing an animal not causing it harm?

I can't think of any animals which we eat in modern society that have the cognitive capabilities to understand and possibly demand a right and consent to life. Thus, there's no harm done.

So the pain it feels doesn't matter simply because it's not as intelligent as us?

Shivari:
If you cut off a pig's leg, it'll know about and it will be thinking "Oh my God! You just cut off my leg!"

You're anthropomorphizing again.

Well yeah, but it will still very much feel the pain and be afraid of you from then on. And it sure wouldn't be happy. I know it's not going to actually think those words.

Err, the conversation that I initiated and which you responded to (with which I responded to with the picture of a Drosophila brain) was about insects.

Ahh, I overlooked that. I wasn't talking about insects, I was talking about plants, which do not have brains.

paulgruberman:
So unless you're prepared to ignore the evidence, the pain line on the morally edibile scale is arbitrary.

Plants feel pain, I've already admitted that. But they don't have a brain and don't have feelings attributed to the pain. For them it's just pain, it won't make them sad.

Oh, and killerap85, please stop trolling, thanks.

1)Same can be said for plants

2 and 4 relate back to emotion. again how do you gage emotion in an insect or plant?edit: or animal

The troll remark is cute too, considerring that this whole thread amounts to one. That or a very naive and close minded persons view of how the world should be just like how I live my life.

Starving villages? Thing of the past in my world. Let them eat cake

Spleeni
Press Junketeer
Posts: 427
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

paulgruberman:
Ok everyone, the thread is moving pretty quickly, quotes are flying back and forth, signals are getting mixed, and tempers may be getting flared. We don't need banning and probations messing up this gem of a discussion, so if you need to, take a break, go gank some n00bs online perhaps, and come back and see how things have progressed. Don't worry about instantly replying to posts, it's just not worth the extra stress.

Always remember to keep things civil.

I agree with this man. Get some sleep people! Stop getting so personal.

<.<

Alright, if everyone's calmed down, I'll give my view:

Not only is eating meat a natural, and morally decent thing to do; but there is really no other alternative. Everything dies; the only thing that we are doing is ending their lives a little quicker.

This goes for both plants AND animals.

Just because an animal can feel pain; doesn't mean that plants can't, or that they don't care. Plants just seem more alien to us than a cute fluffy puppy.

paulgruberman
Web Developer
Posts: 237
Joined: 6 Jun 2007

Shivari:

Plants feel pain, I've already admitted that. But they don't have a brain and don't have feelings attributed to the pain. For them it's just pain, it won't make them sad.

Now we're crossing over into a poorly defined (in terms of animal response) 'emotions' area. There are more animals that don't respond in any way, shape or form that could even be mistaken as emotions than those that do. I'm not saying there aren't any; I'm saying we're only recognizing those we see as similar to our own.

Insects have brains and nervous systems, but I don't think anyone attributes emotional ability to them. So having a brain and nervous system isn't a requirement (unless I'm mistaken about people attributing emotions to insects).

Are we sure we know what 'emotions' look like in other forms of life? If not, how far back down the chain do we go? If one plant in the midst of others exhibits signs of failing to thrive despite favorable conditions, could it be attributable to sadness/depression?

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

"Are we sure we know what 'emotions' look like in other forms of life? If not, how far back down the chain do we go? If one plant in the midst of others exhibits signs of failing to thrive despite favorable conditions, could it be attributable to sadness/depression?"

Did you see that Mythbusters where they played different types of music to different plants to see how it affected(effected(?)) the plants growth? Everything else being the same angry agresive music had detrimental effects. A sign of depression?

Great episode

Caliostro
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 748
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Shivari:
I'm saying that we can live on only non-meat food though, as opposed to eating meats AND non-meats, effectively killing more lives than if we were vegetarian.

Really? Tell me, how many people does a lettuce alone feed? And how many people does a cow alone feed? How many plants are killed to make ONE salad? And how many hamburgers can one single cow or pig make?

Yep, vegetarians in fact kill MORE life than non-vegetarians. Oh the irony.

Dys
Beat Writer
Posts: 165
Joined: 10 Sep 2008

The thing I don't understand about vegatarians is, while no doubt in their mind it makes sense to not kill and eat animals, you are not saving an lives by living solely on vegetables/non animal products.
Countless millions of insects and small mammals are killed DAILY on agricultural farms, whereas with Livestock there is potential for much less animals to killed (you can produce more food over a smaller area of land, by building up buildings etc).
It is in our nature to eat meat, if people choose to contest that I have nothing against them or any problem with it (unless they are blokes, coz that would be gay :P), but its really no more "evil" than eating vegetables 24/7

cabooze
Paperboy
Posts: 37
Joined: 28 Jul 2008

Eating meat is barbaric but it tastes so good i honestly don't care.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

The only vegetarians I respect are ones that do it for religous reasons. More power to them I say. Everything else just amounts to some sort of psuedo intellectual/moral elitism that just isnt true.

Ultrajoe
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4067
Joined: 24 Apr 2008

killerap85:
The only vegetarians I respect are ones that do it for religous reasons. More power to them I say. Everything else just amounts to some sort of psuedo intellectual/moral elitism that just isnt true.

Empathy is real. Do you honestly think it begins with elitism?

Caliostro
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 748
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Fruhstuck:

Caliostro:
Plants are alive too. They just don't scream when you kill them... In fact, they're alive long after you rip them from earth, so you most likely eat them alive.

What, it's not barbaric to kill or eat something alive if it can't scream? That's called hypocrisy.

So no more vegetables for you. What now? You can't eat meat, fish, eggs (What? You wanted to eat chicken fetuses? MURDERER! BARBARIAN!), vegetables, fruit, or anything else really. Guess you're fucked and gotta starve to death or you're a hypocrite and therefore your "legacy" means nothing.

Was this satire?

Nop.

If you're a vegetarian because you don't like meat, Fine.
If you're a vegetarian because you can't eat meat due to some condition or something, s'all good.

If you're a vegetarian to get on the moral high horse that you don't take life to live, that you're "death free", you're a hypocrite.

Plants are alive, animals are alive, insects and bugs are alive. Ever squashed a fly? You killed something. Killed a spider? Murder. Eaten one of those vegan salads stuffed with vegetables? Mass Murder.

The only difference between plants, insects and a cow or a fish is that it's easier to ignore a plant or an insect suffers. But they are very much alive, and they do die for you to eat or worst. You kill insects just because they annoy you. How barbaric is THAT?

Nobody lives death free. And as I said earlier, you end up taking less life if you eat meat than you do if you eat vegetables only.

killerap85
Paperboy
Posts: 50
Joined: 7 Oct 2008

Ultrajoe:

killerap85:
The only vegetarians I respect are ones that do it for religous reasons. More power to them I say. Everything else just amounts to some sort of psuedo intellectual/moral elitism that just isnt true.

Empathy is real. Do you honestly think it begins with elitism?

I dont think its empathy

I think thats what it is often disguised as