Press Junketeer Posts: 418 Joined: 5 Jul 2008 | This will be a work in progress; I don't expect much useful feedback because it's due tomorrow; however, a second/third opinion would be nice so I could touch it up a bit. Telling me where I could make it more clear would be appreciated, and beating me with proper grammar is always helpful.
Righty-o:
Sacrifices
There aren't many things in our short time on this planet that are worthy of the ultimate Sacrifice. However, some ideals and decisions can bring someone to their grave; occasionally they may even go happily. Some ideals are worth dying for, as Sir Thomas Moore proves in A Man for All Seasons. He gives his life to prove a point; and is motivated by the dual aspects of going to God, and establishing that a King has no power over the Church.
This film is very much dominated by the aspects of religious morality; sacrificing one's spirituality for earthly position, and Vica Versa. In many cases, it is seen that the leaders of England are far more willing to give up their religious views in favor of earthly desires. For instance; the King is all too willing to break off his current marriage so he can marry another, and the Archbishop is all too willing to let him. Sir Thomas Moore is a personal friend of many, yet they all betray him to advance their own positions. In addition, he is apparently the only one who values his own afterlife, as he has no help from any of his friends (although he does break a friendship to make sure he doesn't harm anyone else). The film attempts to show humans in a very negative light; in that they attempt to grasp whatever they can, as quickly as they can...no matter the cost.
Sir Thomas Moore seems to be the last man in England that cares about his spirit, AND the well being of the government. Apparently it is very difficult for the typical rulers to multitask.Moore has his sights firm, and his wit sharp. He refused to be outwitted, outsmarted, or in any way tricked out of his opinion. He was very stubborn...and eventually paid for it. Again, he is forsaken by his fellow man; however they are dismayed by Moore's actions, and wish for him to simply accept the status quo. He refuses (as well should he) because he has much a farther sight than the leaders themselves. Even his family turns against him; pleading with him to accept the demands of government. Moore thought that his beliefs superseded,his family's wishes. It's very important to have personal thoughts and beliefs; I believe that Moore did the right thing in fighting for his own.
In many times throughout the film, it's disputed as to who has more power, the Church, or the King. However, the Laws that govern everyone seem to be ground into the dirt. Power is unchecked, and what the King says, goes.
Nowadays, laws are obeyed by kings, peasants, and everyone in between. In the film however, the Magna Carta is generally ignored by everyone except Moore; who points out that the King must follow it.
It is very important that the King(s(and leaders in general)) have limits in one way or another. Without limits, people run free with power, and do whatever their hearts please, there needs to be a general goal for leaders to strive for. Both now and (should of been) in the past.
Support: ?
Conclusion Everyone should be striving to better their society. Leaders are special in that they are the guiding hand of society; as thus, it's very beneficial if they have a firm goal in mind, and limits as to how to achieve them.
Many ideas are worth fighting for, dying for, and generally striving to make sure that everyone acknowledges that they exist. In this example of Sir Thomas Moore; he fights for a limit on the king's power, separation of Church and State, and the betterment of society as a whole. Everyone should fight for what they believe in. The only effect that anyone has on the world are the ideas that they leave.
(Finished, I'll post the version I turned in...eventually) |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 4290 Joined: 23 Dec 2007 | Sounds interesting. Pray continue. |
Press Junketeer Posts: 418 Joined: 5 Jul 2008 | Alright, I'm somewhat unsure of what the mods will think, but I'll attempt to finish before they bring out the sledgehammers. |
Press Junketeer Posts: 367 Joined: 21 May 2008 | lol, u doing vce as well?
my books are generals die in bed and catcher in th rye |
Press Junketeer Posts: 418 Joined: 5 Jul 2008 | I'm a senior in British Literature (with a kickass teacher), I've done Catcher in the Rye last year, but I've never read Generals Die in Bed. |
Press Junketeer Posts: 472 Joined: 26 Apr 2008 | I thought it was good. Not tremendously long though (or are you on a word limit?). Edit On second thought, I like the length.
Spleeni:
It is very important that the King(s(and leaders in general)) have limits in one way or another. Without limits, people run free with power, and do whatever their hearts please, there needs to be a general goal for leaders to strive for. Both now and (should of been) in the past.
Support: ? I could use a little help
Is there any part of the film, or even better an event in history you can cite where a king/leader goes overboard? That could reinforce to thesis pretty well. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 2501 Joined: 3 Mar 2008 | I remember watching the movie.
Loved it. |
This will be a work in progress; I don't expect much useful feedback because it's due tomorrow; however, a second/third opinion would be nice so I could touch it up a bit. Telling me where I could make it more clear would be appreciated, and beating me with proper grammar is always helpful.
Righty-o:
Sacrifices
There aren't many things in our short time on this planet that are worthy of the ultimate Sacrifice. However, some ideals and decisions can bring someone to their grave; occasionally they may even go happily. Some ideals are worth dying for, as Sir Thomas Moore proves in A Man for All Seasons. He gives his life to prove a point; and is motivated by the dual aspects of going to God, and establishing that a King has no power over the Church.
This film is very much dominated by the aspects of religious morality; sacrificing one's spirituality for earthly position, and Vica Versa. In many cases, it is seen that the leaders of England are far more willing to give up their religious views in favor of earthly desires. For instance; the King is all too willing to break off his current marriage so he can marry another, and the Archbishop is all too willing to let him. Sir Thomas Moore is a personal friend of many, yet they all betray him to advance their own positions. In addition, he is apparently the only one who values his own afterlife, as he has no help from any of his friends (although he does break a friendship to make sure he doesn't harm anyone else). The film attempts to show humans in a very negative light; in that they attempt to grasp whatever they can, as quickly as they can...no matter the cost.
Sir Thomas Moore seems to be the last man in England that cares about his spirit, AND the well being of the government. Apparently it is very difficult for the typical rulers to multitask.Moore has his sights firm, and his wit sharp. He refused to be outwitted, outsmarted, or in any way tricked out of his opinion. He was very stubborn...and eventually paid for it. Again, he is forsaken by his fellow man; however they are dismayed by Moore's actions, and wish for him to simply accept the status quo. He refuses (as well should he) because he has much a farther sight than the leaders themselves. Even his family turns against him; pleading with him to accept the demands of government. Moore thought that his beliefs superseded,his family's wishes. It's very important to have personal thoughts and beliefs; I believe that Moore did the right thing in fighting for his own.
In many times throughout the film, it's disputed as to who has more power, the Church, or the King. However, the Laws that govern everyone seem to be ground into the dirt. Power is unchecked, and what the King says, goes.
Nowadays, laws are obeyed by kings, peasants, and everyone in between. In the film however, the Magna Carta is generally ignored by everyone except Moore; who points out that the King must follow it.
It is very important that the King(s(and leaders in general)) have limits in one way or another. Without limits, people run free with power, and do whatever their hearts please, there needs to be a general goal for leaders to strive for. Both now and (should of been) in the past.
Support: ?
Conclusion Everyone should be striving to better their society. Leaders are special in that they are the guiding hand of society; as thus, it's very beneficial if they have a firm goal in mind, and limits as to how to achieve them.
Many ideas are worth fighting for, dying for, and generally striving to make sure that everyone acknowledges that they exist. In this example of Sir Thomas Moore; he fights for a limit on the king's power, separation of Church and State, and the betterment of society as a whole. Everyone should fight for what they believe in. The only effect that anyone has on the world are the ideas that they leave.
(Finished, I'll post the version I turned in...eventually)