Topic Index
EA "Doesn't Need" Take-Two

Username:Password:
Log In
Malygris
News Room Contributor
Posts: 4463
Joined: 12 Nov 2002

EA "Doesn't Need" Take-Two

image

Electronic Arts says it doesn't need Take-Two and now claims the odds of a deal being done are "50/50."

The current deadline for EA's offer to acquire Take-Two Interactive expires on May 16 and Jeff Brown, EA's vice president of corporate communications, described the company's attitude as, "We're not desperate and there's a clock ticking."

Take-Two Chairman Strauss Zelnick recently said the phenomenal success of the Grand Theft Auto IV release "vindicated" his company's strategy of resisting the EA takeover attempt prior to the game's release, but Brown countered that statement, telling GamesIndustry that there was never any question about the game's success or its impact on the deal. "It's always been mystifying as to why they thought it was important to wait," he said. "Everybody knew [Grand Theft Auto IV] was going to be fantastic; everybody new it was going to sell like crazy. So to suggest anyone was surprised by the success of the game, commercial or critical, is nonsense."

Brown said EA's original intention was to complete the deal prior to the Christmas season so it could use the company's publishing muscle to push out more copies of the game than Take-Two could have managed on its own, but the longer the acquisition takes, the less feasible that becomes. "The passage of time serves to weaken the value and the certainty of this deal," he said. "I think it's at best a 50/50 proposition," he said, adding that Take-Two is "not a strategic priority for EA."

"We think [Take-Two's studios] are really great teams, that they're creative people, and we would very much like to give them a home and access to our publishing capability, but we just don't need it."

Permalink

Cousin_IT
Press Junketeer
Posts: 442
Joined: 6 Feb 2008

need has nothing to do with this deal imo. Greed is a better term

Suppahh
Anonymous Source
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Apr 2008

indeed, because if they wouldn't need them, why even bid?

EA is going to ''die'' if they don't watch what they are doing or even saying

TomNook
Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 753
Joined: 21 Feb 2008

Take Two doesn't need EA.

Widell
Paperboy
Posts: 27
Joined: 2 Oct 2007

Hey. At least EA came up with a good copy protection system to keep their customers happy.

j-e-f-f-e-r-s
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1816
Joined: 14 Nov 2007

Widell:
Hey. At least EA came up with a good copy protection system to keep their customers happy.

If that SecuriCom system is a 'good' way to beat piracy, I'll eat my metaphorical hat.

Anyways, EA makes a big fuss about trying to acquire Take-Two, then says they don't need them? Someone's feeling rejected.

thebobmaster
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 6392
Joined: 28 Nov 2007

If you can't beat them, join them.

If you can't get them to join you, claim you don't need them.

Widell
Paperboy
Posts: 27
Joined: 2 Oct 2007

You have to play somewhat neglecting if you want to date another company.

You get what I mean, it's probably a business strategy.

The_root_of_all_evil
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 3743
Joined: 13 Feb 2008

Is this turning into the "how to ask out business's" thread?

Northern
Paperboy
Posts: 27
Joined: 1 Dec 2007

If this is a business strategy, I hope it works for them. Going this low just to acquire a company. It was EA who were going head over heels for Take Two to join them. Seems like a little bit of denial is there too.

GTA IV has been well received and given the company a fresh wad of cash to play with. I hope Rockstar continue to do what they want to do with their franchise.

However, I'm not really one for this legal takeover stuff.

HypnoToad
Anonymous Source
Posts: 6
Joined: 9 Mar 2008

lol EA you are so pretty when you pout

 
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

You must be logged in to post.
Username:  
Password:  
  

Not registered? Sign up for a free account!