| (Pages: 1, 2) | |
News Room Contributor  Posts: 1586 Joined: 19 Aug 2006     | |
News Room Contributor Posts: 1586 Joined: 19 Aug 2006 | Missing standouts to me were Super Mario 64, Super Mario Bros. and/or Super Mario Bros. 3. I'm assuming they figured Super Mario World covered those bases, but I still consider the older SMB games to be more relevant and "classic." Even without those entries, it seems like a solid list with some questionable placement of modern titles, but good picks. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 1182 Joined: 11 Jun 2008   | Wing Commander 2 was a weird grab. especially when tie fighter did it better and with more nostalgia |
Beat Writer  Posts: 185 Joined: 12 Jun 2008     | I was going to say there were some odd picks (and omissions) on that list, but you two beat me to it. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 1537 Joined: 5 Dec 2007   | Call of Duty deserves CoD4's spot, while the second is more popular the first one set a tottaly new standard for FPS's. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 1759 Joined: 7 Feb 2008   | All I'd disagree with is the placing of some, most of the games on here made pretty major contributions to the general flow of gaming. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 3688 Joined: 4 Jul 2008   | What's with the madden on the list? |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 3688 Joined: 4 Jul 2008 | I know about the series but why not just put Madden (series) there instead. |
BANNED  Posts: 302 Joined: 6 May 2008  | Umm to be polite.. where the fuck is Banjo???? User was banned for: Random answer generator request and also do you have any eccentricities?. (Permanent) |
Anonymous Source Posts: 1 Joined: 5 Jun 2007 | I keep looking for the disclaimer: "Attention: No real gamers were consulted during the assembly of this list" Madden 2005? Seriously? |
Anonymous Source  Posts: 7 Joined: 15 Jun 2008 | To me,it's like they asked a few people what some popular games were from back in the day and today,then put them in a list. A lot of theses games are good,but I just feel like those who made the list wouldn't know. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1182 Joined: 11 Jun 2008 |
other than it being Entertainment Weekly, why would you assume that non-gamers made this list? examples? |
Beat Writer  Posts: 216 Joined: 16 Jan 2008 | awww no Thief:Deadly Shadows :-( |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 2234 Joined: 10 Mar 2008   | I'm not sure what the hell this list is supposed to be made of, old "classics" or a mix of old and new? Other than that, i'd disagree with most of the placements of the games but then again i'm just being picky ;) |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 3491 Joined: 13 Feb 2008   | Ahem...Elite? Space Invaders, Pacman, Pong, Space Wars, Star Wars, Counterstrike, The Sims... |
Anonymous Source Posts: 2 Joined: 11 Jun 2008 | No Diablo? boooo |
Pulitzer Laureate  Posts: 845 Joined: 8 Apr 2008  | Um... GTA IV came out in 2008, as in this year, not 2007. Why is it even on the list? At least SOME time should pass before considering a game classic, as most people would agree there's a longevity factor when calling a game classic. Same thing with Bioshock, though that's at least old enough one might argue it has the right to be called a classic. I also COMPLETELY disagree with Super Mario Galaxy, that game was an insult to the series. |
Press Junketeer  Posts: 489 Joined: 9 Oct 2007 | Golden-Eye and Halo above Half-Life? Final Fantasy VII over Chrono Trigger? Gears of War over Starcraft? Seriously, whoever made this list was clinically retarded. |
Paperboy Posts: 26 Joined: 13 May 2008 |
Agreed. And whats with calling this a list of greatest classics then add games from this year and many that aren't a year old since release. To me, Classic gaming is 2D graphics starting from the SNES back. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 2392 Joined: 18 Dec 2007   | What, no System Shock. Who the hell wrote this! |
Press Junketeer  Posts: 442 Joined: 21 Jan 2008 | This list is displaying some serious console bias. They put something like 5 versions of street fighter on there but no Quake or Unreal Tournament 99? Baldur's Gate 2, Fallout or Planescape: Torment? Feh. |
Anonymous Source Posts: 9 Joined: 3 Jul 2008 | I don't understand what the criterium for "Classic" must have been? As such a young game can't have a spot in the list unless it was really and extremely influential. And in my opinion that also makes Everquest rank above World of Warcraft because one of them started the genre while the other one merely perfected it. While World of Warcraft did revitilize the gaming industrys appetite for making mmorpg's, which also makes it a classic of sorts it doesn't really seem fit to put it above predecessors that were clearly an inspiration for it imho. Sales figures shouldn't been much of a factor, but should have hopefully been a result of the classic nature of the game. Just my 2 cents... PS: Put half life right after doom will you? |
News Room Contributor Posts: 1586 Joined: 19 Aug 2006 |
A lot of the games you listed were prior to 1983, the maximum age for a game. However, Counterstrike and The Sims are good picks. |
Beat Writer  Posts: 191 Joined: 14 May 2008 | GRAND THEFT AUTO III BELONGS ON THIS LIST, NOT IV. This list is obviously taking historical impact into account... and GTA III is when the series kicked doors down and changed the industry. I don't think that anyone would argue that GTA IV displayed the same level of innovation and amazement that III brought us in its' day. Also, I think Soul Calibur 2 and Street Fighter 2 Turbo easily outclass their predecessors who made it on the list. Not even arguable, really. So... are we going for the originators and innovators? Or are we going for the pinnacle of each series? The list isn't sure, and it suffers accordingly. One more complaint, I don't see anything wrong with having Mario 3, Super Mario World, and Mario 64 all on the list. Same w/ Resident Evil 2 and 4. Tecmo Bowl AND Tecmo Super Bowl (if you aren't American, you won't understand). Metroid is the only series to get 2 entries on the list. If Metroid 2 and Metroid Prime make the list, then Mario 3 and Mario 64 should be there as well. Argh. This is a GOOD list, but there's still SO much wrong. Why can't everybody share my opinions on everything. Fuck. PS: Earthbound |
Press Junketeer  Posts: 359 Joined: 21 Nov 2007 | Reasonable for the most part but a few odd choices. |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 2794 Joined: 8 May 2008 | Halo over Half-life?! The forums will now implode |
Paperboy Posts: 39 Joined: 16 Jun 2008 | If we're talking innovation and the impact it had on future games, they're missing out on a few classics. I mean, I know Starcraft is great and all, but really Dune 2 or Command and Conquer should have been the pick for a "classic" RTS in my opinion for how much they managed to mold the genre. TWO Final Fantasy games? Not necessary. No love for the online FPS? Counter Strike and/or Quake should be up there as they seriously made a significant impact. Wipeout also strikes me as an odd choice considering I've never seen it reffered to as a classic anywhere, ever. I suppose you're always going to get a bit of controversy over these lists, but jeez, it's missing a helluva lot of gaming history there. |
Infamous Scribbler  Posts: 636 Joined: 26 Mar 2008 | A list created by non-gamers i guess. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 3491 Joined: 13 Feb 2008 |
There's a maximum age for a game now? Grief... |
Gone Gonzo  Posts: 1239 Joined: 18 Sep 2007  |
Ahem...
(Emphasis mine) It's not that there's a stale-date for games, it's that EW was looking at the last quarter century. -- Steve |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 3491 Joined: 13 Feb 2008 | Ah, I thought that was a little harsh. Still, you do have to wonder what the basic criteria for a "classic" "game" was. Especially with classic (usually denoting ageless) has an age restriction. |
Paperboy Posts: 30 Joined: 21 Jan 2008 | Half-Life way too low, Guitar Hero way too high. Glad Psychonauts is on the list, but I would have put it higher up... love me some Psychonauts. ehh, I know what games I like, I don't need to have it echoed at me by the internet to feel right with the world so I'm not going to get antsy about this. But it's still not a very good list. |
Assistant Video Producer  Posts: 382 Joined: 19 Feb 2006  | They made a list of popular games, but not all popular games are classic. A classic is something that stands the test of time. COD4, GTA4, and Gears of War are all great, but are any of you still playing GTA3? With the plethora of amazing games hitting the market all the time. I have a hard time imagining me playing anything that's released now in 10 years. The market is saturated to the point that nothing is revolutionary any more. |
Infamous Scribbler  Posts: 640 Joined: 21 Feb 2008 |
.....I still play GTA3..... |
Press Junketeer Posts: 489 Joined: 9 Oct 2007 |
Actually, I replayed through GTA3 a few months ago. |
| (Pages: 1, 2) | |
Reply to Thread
|
|
Not registered? Sign up for a free account! |
Entertainment Weekly Ranks 50 "New Classic" Games
Entertainment news outlet Entertainment Weekly has selected its top 50 classic games from the past 25 years.
With gaming's demographic encompassing a new generation of gamers, many newcomers may not remember the old gems from the Frogger days. Game industry reporters Wook Kim, Geoff Keighley, and Gary Eng Walk compiled a 50-game long list of modern classics from the NES era through 2007.
Topping the charts are two timeless titles many gamers will likely agree with: Tetris, which EW describes as "a blockbuster in every sense of the word," and Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, which brought "an engaging epic quest, clever puzzles, tight controls" to the third dimension.
EW's full list, from greatest to least-classic includes:
A fine list, to be sure, but we're guessing you have your own suggestions to make, so start making them.
Source: Entertainment Weekly
Permalink