Topic Index
Poll: How Long Would Yahtzee Last at Gamespot?


How long would Yahtzee last at GameSpot?
1 minute
20.2% (18)
20.2% (18)
1 hour
3.4% (3)
3.4% (3)
1 day
3.4% (3)
3.4% (3)
1 week
5.6% (5)
5.6% (5)
Yahtzee is far too intelligent and discriminating to work for an ignorant bunch of slobs like GameSpot
67.4% (60)
67.4% (60)
Username:Password:
Log In
Rjak
Paperboy
Posts: 33
Joined: 18 Oct 2007

...or for that matter Erik, Chet or Seanbaby??

diemkay
Paperboy
Posts: 13
Joined: 31 Oct 2007

What was that about the fork...and places...let's not go there. I'm sure Yahtzee likes attention but let's not. We all know the answer to this.

The Rogue Wolf
Muckraker
Posts: 333
Joined: 25 Nov 2007

My stopwatch only measures to the hundrendth of a second.

;)

DeadZero
Anonymous Source
Posts: 3
Joined: 26 Oct 2007

He could last forever if you give him a chainsaw and licence to kill XD

blackadvent
Beat Writer
Posts: 225
Joined: 16 Nov 2007

I voted one minute without seeing the last option.

beoweasel
Copy Clerk
Posts: 70
Joined: 26 Nov 2007

I'm pretty sure they would have axed him after the Halo 3 review.

TheDarkArchon
Paperboy
Posts: 31
Joined: 20 Oct 2007

1 minute. He'd get cut off during his anti-American rant in his MoH review.

LyonLee
Copy Clerk
Posts: 65
Joined: 30 Aug 2007

Strangely enough, he could be made to last a particularly long time there.
You see, everyone and everything has their purpose in life. Gamespot's and their managers' purpose is to make gobs of money.
Yahtzee's purpose is to be as big a dick as possible.
You'd be surprised how well they'd work together. They could use him. All they need to do is hand him exclusively BAD games. Games that probably weren't going to sell well in the first place, and (as a sideline in blackmail) didn't spend enough in advertising on their site. Take a look at some book reviews, if you don't believe me. http://www.nplusonemag.com/situation_1.html
The wholly negative ones tend to stand out as being "honest" or "having a high standard". Every so often, they'll throw out a negative game review as well in the hopes of maintaining their credibility, or something to point to when things like this hit the fan.

So, as I said, he could be an invaluable asset to them, if they were capable of controlling his rants to games that they particularly select. They wouldn't want him to give a good review, or a bad review of a good game, or a game that paid well. As even Yahtzee said, "nobody likes it when I'm being nice to a game." Keep him reviewing exclusively bad games and he'd be funny as hell, making the site more popular and giving them their precious integrity.

Saskwach
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2148
Joined: 4 Nov 2007

Sadly there was no "1 video review" option.

Zera
Muckraker
Posts: 285
Joined: 12 Sep 2007

I would say he would last a while as long as:

1. he keeps wearing that hat
2. dont give him any games to review

soladrin
Muckraker
Posts: 237
Joined: 9 Sep 2007

DeadZero:
He could last forever if you give him a chainsaw and licence to kill XD

yea i agree, with that approach, no problem :) otherwise, he would turn in sick on day 1 :P

Arbre
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1137
Joined: 13 Jan 2007

Admitting the already flawed premise that Yaht' would ever land in that magazine...
My answer would be:

Infinity and beyond.
He'd be untouchable, and everybody would know that only a few game makes it out of his grind machine unharmed.

Lance Icarus
Muckraker
Posts: 258
Joined: 12 Oct 2007

I think he would last until his first review, at which time Gamespot will finally realize that he isn't Alex Navarro in a cool new hat.

Final_Assassin_42
Paperboy
Posts: 29
Joined: 28 Nov 2007

Yahtzee would probably cut his own face off before working at GameStop. Same for Seanbaby.

blackfly01
Copy Clerk
Posts: 69
Joined: 5 Dec 2007

I'm betting his critical intelligence/opinion wouldn't get him very far reviewing on Gamespot, but I'm sure he'd make a lasting impression with some of the mature users there; they are there, they're just hard to find.

dannyodwyer
Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Dec 2007

This gamespot story seems to have gotten legs and ran about fantasy land.
According to the Gamespot Podcast today, it might have had nothing to do with the K&L video review after all. And even if it does, it doesn't necessarily mean that past or future reviews would contain tilt for/against certain titles.

But yea, im gonna go with TheDarkArchon on this one.

Kermi
Muckraker
Posts: 349
Joined: 7 Nov 2007

dannyodwyer:
According to the Gamespot Podcast today, it might have had nothing to do with the K&L video review after all.

And Gamespot has no reason at all to lie. It's not like they've lost masses of subscribers, compromised their integrity in an increasingly fickle web culture, or become a gaming industry laughing stock. I'm sure any piece of information we get from Gamespot from now on can be considered a marvellous beacon of mighty, mighty truth.

Asif
Paperboy
Posts: 15
Joined: 4 Dec 2007

Rjak:
...or for that matter Erik, Chet or Seanbaby??

Erik (Wolpaw, I'm assuming) worked for GameSpot as a freelancer for quite a while.

Sylocat
Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 614
Joined: 13 Nov 2007

Yahtzee would be a breath of fresh air to the circlejerk bribe machine that is mainstream game reviews, but he'd last about 8 nanoseconds before the palmgreasers ordered him out.

Garfgarog
Copy Clerk
Posts: 90
Joined: 16 Sep 2007

He'd last forever. He'd find a way to fire the entire staff and run the site himself.

Copter400
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2099
Joined: 14 Sep 2007

Gamespot doesn't really run like that. I think Yahtzee offers some real insight, if in a somewhat psychotic manner, about the games and their content. A game review site like Gamespot just wants to inform the viewer of how good or bad the game is. It would be like reading a newspaper article that's been written in the form of a beat poem.

 
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

You must be logged in to post.
Username:  
Password:  
  

Not registered? Sign up for a free account!