| (Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) | |
Copy Clerk Posts: 119 Joined: 26 Jun 2009 | |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1749 Joined: 27 Apr 2009 |
This is genius. If I was in power over here, I'd send a bunch of S.A.S. dressed up like tourists to help out. Enough PPV sales (and there will be loads), and we could solve the financial crisis, too! Love it! |
PROBATION Posts: 1312 Joined: 12 May 2009 |
The military needs urban conflict simulation training anyway...this would provide the best scenario for the job. Additionally, we'd learn allot more about collateral damage, and identifying appropriate targets first hand. As opposed to learning it in foreign countries. User was put on probation for: PC gamers laugh as MW2 piracy starts with the 360. (7 days) |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1087 Joined: 7 May 2009 | The thing is, when you make gun laws more strict, the people who get them illegally will still be able to get them. And when they get those guns, they know no one else has them because of the gun laws. There is plenty of research being done about gun control and the results might be more shocking than you think. Where there isn't very strict laws, there is FAR less gun crime. On the other hand, where there is strict gun laws, you'll find a higher mortality rate from gun violence. Then, you look at a place like Britain which has banned guns for decades. Not only have the number of stabbings grown exponentially recently, but there is still gun crime, and that is on the rise too. What there needs to be is GUN EDUCATION. The government always bans stuff they think the general populace is too stupid to grasp. Educate the people, show them how guns work, why they are dangerous, and the proper way to store them so kids don't get access and everything would just fine. I'm not saying gun crime would go away. That will NEVER happen, but it will drastically reduce accidental deaths by guns, and it will give the thugs with illegal guns something to think about before they try to rob Average Joe. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1749 Joined: 27 Apr 2009 |
Indeed. I see nothing wrong with this plan. |
Beat Writer Posts: 210 Joined: 2 Sep 2008 | problem with Iraq and Afghanistan is that if we've gone in and destabilized their governments and if we leave before a stable government is established it will wind up worse that before we showed up. that being said we should have never gone into Iraq to begin with. Granted Saddam evil but he didn't pose the threat we where led to believe he did. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 2581 Joined: 2 Oct 2008 |
Um... how about the last part, about more deaths being since the war was over? If they wanted our troops there they wouldn't keep trying to kill us. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1316 Joined: 19 Jun 2009 |
Abso-f(ing)-lutely |
BANNED Posts: 2044 Joined: 7 Jun 2009 |
See this guy gets it just a bit of fun with a short and sweet answer, thank you sir. User was banned for: US army psychiatrist kills 13 soldiers. (Permanent) |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 2712 Joined: 23 Dec 2007 |
Sorry, not, y'know, valid. Mainly because from what I assess, the people trying to kill are in a distinct minority, and fairly unpopular. You must realise that, no matter how much they may dislike us, they will hate suicide bombers more. Hell, many of the insurgents aren't even Iraqi - a lot are Saudi and Iranian nationals. It could well be that we've got a case that 80% of the population is peacefully saying 'Go America, go Britain, go Coaltion!', and you've got the remaining 20% who are being absolute cunts about the fact that we are not going to permit them to set up a theocratic state on land we fought and took in the name of democracy. And don't say they don't want democracy, because you can't prove that either. P.S Sorry if I seem a bit militant or angry, I just got off doing an extra four hours at my job after I'd clocked out. I'd like to furthermore add that your avatar is of a high quality.
Oh wow, another poster with all the subtlety of sledgehammer and the style of a cowshit coated in margerine. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1604 Joined: 11 Jan 2009 |
Yeah because I'm supposed to just accept all the anti Americanism here. Thread fails. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1604 Joined: 11 Jan 2009 |
And yes this |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 2712 Joined: 23 Dec 2007 |
No, your supposed to put together a rational, cogent counter-argument and not behave like a Ritalin-popping twelve-year old, or at least not like the 'ignorant, fearful, scared-of-change, instinctively-distrustful and suspicous American Hick' stereotype that gets waved about by so many snooty pseudo-intellectual teens in their angsty counter-culture fashion. And yes, by insulting both sides, one can construct a balanced argument. |
PROBATION Posts: 1312 Joined: 12 May 2009 |
How about this equation, 27 million people versus 160,000. America's army is good...but not that good. If all Iraqi's wanted Americans gone, there's absolutely nothing...nothing, our army could do to stop it. User was put on probation for: PC gamers laugh as MW2 piracy starts with the 360. (7 days) |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 1604 Joined: 11 Jan 2009 |
Why do I need to argue what is common sense? Threads like these are horribly unoriginal. Every day there is someone bashing America. Its bullshit and people need to give it a rest. |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 2712 Joined: 23 Dec 2007 |
Firstly, because |
Infamous Scribbler Posts: 636 Joined: 3 Apr 2009 |
^This, i'm a Brit and i am tired of all the American hatred here. 1)- Lend-Lease in WW2- kept Britain fighting in WW2, also benefited the USSR. Now of course not all would agree with these points (and indeed i myself question quite a few of them. There are two sides to every coin, i am just trying to re-address the balance). For instance the Marshall plan was partially motivated by American self-interest, America did not want Western Europe turning Communist. You could also argue that America wields to much power culturally- hence the expression- "Cultural Imperialism"- and throws around its military weight to much. However, in comparison to past super-powers America shows more restraint than past superpowers- America doesn't officially seek out to conquer other countries. You could argue that America is economically to powerful- the current economic crisis, and the other one that struck in 1929 was caused by America. To people who don't what America is- verbally sniping America isn't going to archive anything. To us Europeans who are jealous of America's economic,political, military and cultural dominance- Then I say we need to get working. Political bodies, such as the EU- are there to boost Europe's economic and political powers, so hopefully in the future we can stand as equals to America. With a more influential Europe (which can only come with a united Europe)hopefully the said grievances against America can be addressed- |
Gone Gonzo Posts: 4663 Joined: 20 Mar 2009 | Yes they should. To be honest, most of Britain never wanted to go to Iraq, Tony Blair just made us go because of the oil there. Also why America wanted to go in the first place as well. A,erica also has a deal with the UK where anyone they want can be just deported to America and trialed there with no evidence needed for deportion and shipping. Whilst they have some positive impact on the world, this thread is meant to be about the negative impact and their problems, which have just caused problems for the rest of the world. |
| (Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) | |
|
|
Not registered? Sign up for a free account! |
This topic did nothing. If you hate America then keep it to yourself.