Fame |
7.4% (9) | |
Fortune |
90.9% (110) |
| (Pages: 1, 2) | |
Couldn't I be well-off and moderately well-known instead? | |
Fortune, i can buy everything i want, and who cares about media attention anyway. | |
Fortune, being famous would suck. Although, being famous because I am a respected [something] would be alright, but being a famous socialite, or pop singer would be downright horrible. | |
The two are somewhat connected to each other. Famous people tend to become rich at some point an people with vast amounts of money are sometimes considered famous. | |
Famous, but only for the things I enjoy doing and am good at. I'm not too fussed about being rich. I just want enough money to pay off all my student loans and bills, enable me to get a good flat (preferably a swanky Docklands apartment or something) and enough to let me live comfortably and buy a few luxuries without needing to worry about my svings going dry or whatever. If I have that, that's all I need. So yeah, I'd rather be famous if it's for something I'm good at and enjoy doing, like acting or writing... | |
Well, for personal gain i would say "Fortune" For others? Fame, that way i can rake in money for charity. | |
fortune. the most powerful people in the world today do all their work out of the limelight | |
Fortune. Not because I love money, but because when I see fame, I see all the negatives - the lack of privacy, the stalkers, the paparazzi. Not for me. No thanks. | |
Money, I could live life care-free and in comfort, but with fame I would have to contend with the bullshit of the media as well. With just fortune I could be as much of a bastard or a slob as I wanted and nobody would care. | |
I thought with fame comes fortune, hence the term rich and famous. Then again, wealth can be quantified with a bank balance, but how do you measure fame?. | |
Perhaps fortune rather than fame. I'd prefer that I think. | |
Doesn't fame breed fortune? Anyway, riches. Everything would be mine... | |
I would hate being famous. That's why I chose fortune, if only because there are just 2 options on the poll. | |
Good question for me, actually. Being rich and unknown would be just plain awesome, but if i was world-famous, i could spread my agenda with ease. I'm not sure who i'd like to become - rich guy or famous guy. | |
I don't get why people want to be famous. Every time I think of fame I think of someone like Robbie Williams, who's blatantly insecure. Being famous for fame's sake ain't cool. | |
Fortune, fame looks so shit. it makes me think that the famous are generally rich as a consolation for having so many annoying people hang off of them. | |
This, pretty much Being rich doesn't attract unwanted attention | |
Fortune. I'd rather be the behind the scenes string-puller than the face that gets blamed for everything. | |
I would have to say Rich, i have no interest in being overly popular to the rest of the world. | |
Fortune, baby. Then I could buy fame if I wanted. Not that I would, though.... | |
Given what I would be if famous (rockstar or writer) it would tend to have rather a lot of fortune attached. But even if it didn't, I'm one of those lame people who actually does things for the art, not the money. | |
fortune plz | |
Fortune, for me, fame seems a little boring? | |
I care for neither. | |
lets weigh the pros and cons here: fame:pros:... fortune:pros:you have money, you can use said money without the reporters hounding you like you were a famous person, and you have money. hmmmm, i wonder which i'll pick. | |
Get Rich. Buy Cookies. And being famous usually pays well too. But then everyone will know how many cookies you ate. | |
I wouldn't mind a bit of fame, to be honest. The attention seeking bastard I am. But I wouldn't like worthless fame. But fortune wins hands down, if I was rich enough not to have to work I could do whatever I wanted. Be that making a super awesome album, or writing a super awesome novel or being behind some super awesome films. Plus I'd have the 'rich list type fame'. Anyway, if I was RICH BEYOND MY WILDEST DREAMS then I could have some scrounging socialite children to play the fame game for me, and fall out of nightclubs coked up to their eyeballs. | |
I like money, money is good, therefore lots of of money is lots of good. But I'd wouldn't being famous if it was for being a great traceur, but I guess I like money a lot more. | |
anyone who picks Fame over Fortune is stupid. | |
frickin rich baby! fortune will buy me a way to fame if i wanted to.(i don't) | |
They go hand in hand if you're famous you'll most likely get whatever you want and if you're rich people will know who you are and bother you regardless. But yeah fortune at first I'd have peace until the people come knocking at my door for money. | |
In terms of this forum, you are already. OT; Fortune, because fame turns you into a caricature at the mercy of the public. I site Katie Price as an example. | |
From someone who got a brief and very very small taste of the "fame without much money" thing, I'd choose 'a rich nobody' any hour of any day of the week. The novelty of being recognized is pretty much the only thing fame has going for it, and that novelty wears off in about 1 day, and becomes a huge pain in the d&*k every day after that. I don't think there is one single consequence with the 'rich and nobody knows who you are' side of things! | |
Fame isnīt going to get me a mansion with a swimming pool and all the lapdances I could possibly want. | |
| (Pages: 1, 2) | |
so basically what I want to know is what would you rather be, rich but not famous or famous but not very rich?
Personally I would rather be rich because I think the media would be very annoying.