| (Pages: 1, 2, 3) | |
I'm disappointed. I liked Craig in the role, and if it takes years for someone to pick it up, he'll be to old to continue with Bond. | |
shame. Craig was really good, despite the mis-steps made in Quantum of Solace. Casino Royale was easily on par with Goldeneye. -m | |
meh, I honestly think my love of James Bond ended with Brosnan. Not that Craig is bad or anything, it's just that the character isn't the same. | |
What was wrong with Quantum of Solace? OT: It's obviously not completely dead, but I do worry that Craig will not get the role again; he's my favourite by far. | |
They're closer to the novels and less family oriented, they're definitely not the same. At least this will free Craig up to do more works. I'd like to see him | |
Bond isn't going to die with MGM. They gave it a good run but there's no way that he'll be leaving the silver screen without someone picking up the reins. Heh. The guy survived six movie incarnations, eleven directors, five different authors, and sixty-seven years of peril. Believe me, he'll cope. | |
Damn, I liked Craig. I hoped he would at least get 3 movies in before the Bond torch was passed. No doubt the film series will be renewed in the future, but not with Craig as Bond. | |
Bond died than casino royale came out for me it was like somebody took james and broke all he's bones and than took him to the backyard and shot him whith a shotgun in the head. | |
Since MGM owns the rights to the movies it is dead if you look at it that way. Unless they do what the article said and sell it to some other studio, there won't be one for a long time. $4 billion debt...they have to make like 2 Avatar income generator movies | |
Hated Craig in the role (nothing actually against Craig, I just hated that they tried to make him like Bourne but British, it didn't work.) Sure you could argue that it was taking him back to the books, but Bond films haven't actually been that close to the books since Doctor No, (Doctor No being both the first Bond film I saw and the first Bond book I read, the book I read first, then saw the film.) The Bond films have always been a place for everyone's favourite campy superspy ultimate Brit hero, they are not the place for shaky-cam and gritty realism. Look at how much everyone hated the Timothy Dalton era the last time they tried to go gritty etc. In fact, I think I've just cracked it. Last time they tried to make the films darker they utterly tanked and Bond was canned for nearly twenty years. They didn't learn from their mistake and he's been canned again. So the solution as I see it is simple. Bring back the Bond Girls, bring back the Gadgets, for the love of God bring back some of that good old fahsioned one liner humour (it's called the Bond One-Liner on TVTropes for a reason after all) and let film Bond get back to film Bond's roots, because he has no business taking from the books anymore. I do hope he comes back though, he was pretty much my first ever fictional hero at age 10 (I read Doctor No when I was young...) | |
Say it with me, people: FUCK. | |
Well, I'm glad it won't be Craig anymore, but I hope the next film doesn't take too long. | |
Poor story, ineffectual poorly defined bad guys, bad script, one good action sequence and then meh, dire theme tune, doubly dire when measured against the fantastic one Chris Cornell cam up with for Casino Royale. It was missing the awesome action sequences like the two big jumps in Goldeneye or the construction site sequence in Casino Royal, it also seemed to have completely lost the sense of humour that was in Royale that helped the film along so well. It also lost it's sense of identity, it desperately wanted to be a Bourne movie, It even used some of the same camera tricks and scene set ups as the Bourne movies do. But Bond is the polar opposite of Bourne, he is the agent with unlimited resources who hunts down and murders men like Bourne without question. Filming it like a Bourne movie was never going to work. Still, it was better than Die Another Day. I am holding out for Clive Owen as Bond, he would be awesome. Also, whatever the financial upheavels at MGM, one thing is certain. James Bond will return... | |
Meh. I've never been too much of a James Bond movies fan. Maybe they'll come up with another wise-cracking pun-fu wielding character... Just like every second action character these days. And yes, I'm aware that James Bond movies date quite a while back and that they may or may not have been one of the first to use that kind of characteristics for their protagonist. I've watched about the third of all the movies, mostly the old ones - I think the newest one I've seen was that one with some kind of an ice castle, a giant laser, and super-tasers. Or some shit like that. The (movie) series were always a bit too campy for me, and not in a good way. | |
I just couldn't get used to Craig being there as the switchover. Don't get me wrong, he's a good actor, I just never saw him as Bond material. He's just not as refined as Brosnan, or Roger Moore. | |
I think that's too bad... Bond has been around for almost 40 years, it would be a shame to see it end like this. But at the same time, and despite what Matt said, I think Bond ended on a good note. | |
thank you recession for removing the fail known as Daniel Craig from the awesome role of James Bond | |
That sucks, I was really looking forward to a Bond movie NOT directed by Marc Forster (QoS was a steaming shitpile), I guess I'll be waiting a long while to get that awful, awful taste out of my mouth. If Bond is dead, he certainly limped into that shallow grave of his. | |
Bond hasn't been good since Craig got the job. OR it may be decent since, if the popular theory that Bond isn't a person is true. | |
I hope Michael Bay won't ruin it. It's the very best if a movie franchise series you can produce. If that deuce bag ruins it... I'll have no real forgiveness. 23 good movies, I won't like to see it being thorned at the 24:th. | |
Well whoever films the next one (and there WILL be next Bond movie, no doubt about it) I hope they keep Craig for the lead role, I got used to him and he wasn't half bad so far. | |
wasn't Quantum of Solace based on a true story? well I guess I could understand that history is not the most exciting thing especially when its about raising the price of water. | |
Indeed. Craig was one of the best, if not the best, Bonds I've seen. | |
To be honest I am glad. I think they were ruining Bond by trying to turn him into just yet another generic "realistic" action hero and thus depriving Bond of completely everything that makes him what he is. A super charming James Bond with a Jetpack that shoots Zombie Nazis in outer space and saves the world=Good. A gritty James Bond that fights realistic bad guys that have generic motivations=Shit on a sandwich.
BURN THE HERETIC! | |
Awww, I liked Craig. It won't be long till someone else picks this up though. I'll give it 5 years. | |
As long as it isn't bloody Pierce Brosnan again I'll be happy. | |
I must be the only one who hated the gimmicky bullshit that Bond became before Craig was given the role. Was I the only one who saw just how terrible Die Another Day was? Or realized the Roger Moore was a mincing old fart when he started the role, let alone by the time he got to View to a Kill? Pierce Brosnan was doing okay with the role until they decided to go crazy with Die Another Day. | |
Daniel Craig is not amused.
| |
For me, James Bond died when Sean Connery left the role. | |
Good Riddance is all I'll say about this. | |
Your right it's in a coma | |
I won't go quite that far... but I'm not exactly sad about this either. | |
Well you know what they say......"You only live twice" It had to be said. In all seriousness I have full faith that more films/games will come out eventually. | |
MGM has changed hands before and even if they wind up having to sell off the release rights for Bond (ye gods, what a bidding war that would make), there will be future Bond movies. No studio would be stupid enough to just sit on that kind of property. EON will more than likely keep holding the production bag, which means if a new studio grabs the property, we'll still see consistancy as far as the content goes. | |
| (Pages: 1, 2, 3) | |
Well, it's official now.
http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/07/james-bond-is-dead
If some other studio gets their hands on the franchise, for the love of god DON'T give it to Michael Bay...
Anyone sad, disappointing, [insert emotion here]? I know I am. I love the films (although I won't lie, I haven't seen the ones with Craig).