Maybe the idiots who believe their drivel would be forced to read actual news about actual events, rather than self created hysteria
If Fox News is horribly inaccurate, then why is it the highest rated network? Not just above other news networks, ALL networks. That's like calling the highest rated show in the world dumb. You just insult the thousands that watch it. Then again, you're
probably just a Bill Marr drone, who doesn't use logic or common sense to make conclusions.
Why was Fox News the only news network that reported racism in the church President Obama attended? Why was Fox News the only news network that reported BOTH SIDES of the health care debate? Why was Fox News the only news network reporting any of 500 pages of Obama's broken promises? If you want actual news, seems like Fox is your only choice. I know you believe something stupid like "they just support Republicans", but that just shows how little you know about them. All the candidates for Presidency are being put under scrutiny by Fox News. The only exception seems to be Mitt Romney, which is dumb and annoying.
Try to get facts before making accusations, because people who watch Fox News sure do.
Though I don't like everything on Fox News, thank you so much for this post. Yes it is slanted a bit to the right, but I suppose that is pure evil to the hip left wing young kids. I'm so tired of kids making it sound like the devil because they let everyone talk, including idiots. I'm sorry, but everyone I see bash Fox News seems uneducated to me now, mostly because I see that the kids who do bash it rarely have anything to say besides they're evil or stupid. So, thank you dude. Thank you.
OT: Facebook! Only because I'd love to watch the majority of people freak out.
If Fox News is horribly inaccurate, then why is it the highest rated network? Not just above other news networks, ALL networks. That's like calling the highest rated show in the world dumb. You just insult the thousands that watch it. Then again, you're
probably just a Bill Marr drone, who doesn't use logic or common sense to make conclusions.
Why was Fox News the only news network that reported racism in the church President Obama attended? Why was Fox News the only news network that reported BOTH SIDES of the health care debate? Why was Fox News the only news network reporting any of 500 pages of Obama's broken promises? If you want actual news, seems like Fox is your only choice. I know you believe something stupid like "they just support Republicans", but that just shows how little you know about them. All the candidates for Presidency are being put under scrutiny by Fox News. The only exception seems to be Mitt Romney, which is dumb and annoying.
Try to get facts before making accusations, because people who watch Fox News sure do.
Though I don't like everything on Fox News, thank you so much for this post. Yes it is slanted a bit to the right, but I suppose that is pure evil to the hip left wing young kids. I'm so tired of kids making it sound like the devil because they let everyone talk, including idiots. I'm sorry, but everyone I see bash Fox News seems uneducated to me now, mostly because I see that the kids who do bash it rarely have anything to say besides they're evil or stupid. So, thank you dude. Thank you.
OT: Facebook! Only because I'd love to watch the majority of people freak out.
l3o2828: I'd create my own website then delete it. Because web censorship is WRONG. :V Here we are fighting against laws like SOPA then we go all happy-smiley discussing which site we would take down. Hypocrisy much?
I don't think anyone in this thread is THAT serious about it : \
OT:
www.googel.com
because I have mispelled google waaay too many times and am sick of that "congratulations! you're a winner" recording.
I ust tried spelling Google that way and it brought me to the real google.
Wikipedia. Then all the knowledge humanity has accumulated (at least according to the reactions to wikipedia blackout) would be gone, and people would go apeshit.
Hmm... I'd have to research whatever website has the largest number of conspiracy nuts. Maybe Birthers, Truthers, or the "End is Nigh" bunch. Possibly some of the more hardcore "UFOs visit regularly, but our otherwise wildly inefficient government covers it up" groups.
Watching them freak out would probably be the most fun.
Failing that, I'll go with those who pointed out news organizations that mix their news and opinion segments without clarifying that there is a difference.
Tumblr. I swear to god, anyone that starts using that site slowly starts to become arrogant beyond belief. That, and it's also like a second 4chan, and who really wants another?
What's the point of that site? Intentionally poorly coded and seizure-inducing Javascript as a form of art? Weird kaleidoscopic porno collages as some sort of social commentary? A directory of all known serial killers for the -nth writer in need of inspiration for a rote supervillain?
TakeyB0y2: Tumblr. I swear to god, anyone that starts using that site slowly starts to become arrogant beyond belief. That, and it's also like a second 4chan, and who really wants another?
Tumblr! That is a really good one, I can't believe I didn't think of that. I tried using it, but in the end I just couldn't stand it. The people on that site are scary. Were I trying to do a favor for the internet, I would so choose Tumblr, though I still might have to say Facebook just to see how it goes down.
Excuse me, could you kind gentlemen/women direct me to the website with the largest collection of pornograph? I have been hired to burn it to the ground.
Google. If they go down, YT probably go down to. I think Google is trying to organize a hostile takeover of EVERYTHING (I dunno, I just don't like google cuz they're assholes) and when they go down, those evil personal sphere modifications will have a lot less effect. Bing will still have it, but people will probably start using more generic search engines that don't modify your search results.
Any major child porn site. I don't personally know any, but I figure I'd be doing the world some good by shutting one of those disgusting sites down for keeps.
I say we call a truce, since the guy 'neath your post, BOOMheadshot65, wants to burn down the site with the most pornography. And I do believe neither of us want that.
After we publicly flog him, we may resume the animosity twixt us.
Yahoo (their news articles are atrocious and when they do game related stories I want to kill myself at how bad they are. They seriously just google for 5 minutes and write about that)
9gag (I feel like a hipster but too many kiddies jumping in on the memes. I dun like it)
I say we call a truce, since the guy 'neath your post, BOOMheadshot65, wants to burn down the site with the most pornography. And I do believe neither of us want that.
After we publicly flog him, we may resume the animosity twixt us.
Well shit, have a cold one on me. You are now my new best bud.
I fucking hate DeviantArt... For every decent, not good or great, just decent piece of work there, you have to trudge through 5000 pieces of shit.
...Maybe I'm jaded but i've found that true of all aspects in my life, wading through shit to find gems. So for what small good there is I do at least appeciate Deviantart trying. Unlike some of the more unsavory art gallery sites out there, and some that just plain STEAL MONEY from artists and the law unable to do anything.
I feel like Deviantart is the least of the shit, or maybe as an artist and having done the rounds of a billion art websites I'm just happy taking the one that abuses me the least.
FalloutJack: Under the idea that I may destroy one website in a 'for good' manner, I destroy 'that place Anon hangs out at', meaning that they can't have a hide-out, period. No negotiations. This is a case of reconstructing reality and I will not change my vote.
But the problem is that they DON'T hang out at one place. Raids are posted on multiple sites/image boards other than 4chan. Comunication is done through IRC. Press releases are done throughout many sites including blogspot.com and youtube.com Actual training (site that is designed to be a training tool for hackers) is done on another site (not posting URL as I don't like Ban hammers) Targets are posted within sites that have .onion adresses...
So essentially you have to take out not just more than one site but many other protocols as well... Also this is only really the surface and even if all these went down they would still survive. And that is not the power that was allowed.
Soo... OT:
I would take out 9gag.com or youtube.com just to wreck havok
No real contest, my friends. I really dislike that site.
What about furaffinity? Its DA with more mature content AND furries. That's like upgrading from Stalin to the offspring of Cruella De'ville and Hitler.
Actually, I don't dislike furries as much as I once did. And I think it's better to keep them there and let them have their fun.
Rule 34 just to see what happens. That or wildcritters.net (i think that's a site) it scarred for months after I saw a picture of a pignite raping a victini
JokerboyJordan: How can you talk about getting the facts right; when you and Fox News don't?
Funny how you say that after confirming that my information was correct.
Zack1501: A study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland School of Public Affairs, as published in the Winter 03-04 issue of the Political Science Quarterly,[55] reported that poll-based findings[56] indicated that viewers of Fox News, the Fox Broadcasting Company and local Fox affiliates were more likely than viewers of other news networks to hold three purported misperceptions:[55] 67% of Fox viewers believed that the "U.S. has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization" (Compared with 56% for CBS, 49% for NBC, 48% for CNN, 45% for ABC, 16% for NPR/PBS). The belief that "The U.S. has found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq" was held by 33% of Fox viewers and only 23% of CBS viewers, 19% for ABC, 20% for NBC, 20% for CNN and 11% for NPR/PBS 35% of Fox viewers believed that "the majority of people [in the world] favor the U.S. having gone to war" with Iraq. (Compared with 28% for CBS, 27% for ABC, 24% for CNN, 20% for NBC, 5% for NPR/PBS)
Where is the clear cut evidence that these are misconceptions? Did we or did we not find a nuclear plans in Iraq? Did they or did they not smuggle enough gas to wipe out the entire east coast through DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS? Also, in 2003, nearly 60% of the population favored the war in Iraq. Oops. Maybe you should have checked your facts. I sure did.
But there's a small part of me that would rather burn Wikipedia to the ground, just to screw over students at all levels who use it as their only source of information and almost fear the idea of having to open a book or visit a library.
FOX let's everyone talk?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IwIRNM5noY
They report ideas as facts, the biggest journalistic crime, they fuel idiocy and that is dangerous