Actually, according to this "science side" you are referencing, sex is defined by your body structure.
That is, if you have a vagina you're a woman, if you have a penis you're a man.
Chromosomes determine how a body's cells will go about structuring themselves. XX means the cells will arrange female organs, and produce more estrogen that testosterone. XY means more testosterone and male organs. But the chromosomes themselves don't actually do anything in this regard, they are essentially just the instructions.
Think of it this way; someone starts making a loaf of bread, by reading a recipe. They have a dough mix set up, but someone puts in a lot of sugar and butter and some other ingredients. When the bread comes out, it's a cake. It tastes like cake, it has the consistency of cake etc. Would you call it a bread loaf, though, because the original instructions said it was so, even though said instructions are no longer adhered to?
That analogy doesn't work in this situation, because the transsexual was already one thing before the operation.
So the proper analogy going with your food reference: I mix the ingredients together to make bread, I bake it, and bread comes out.
Then after a day or two, I do something to turn that bread into a cake. Said bread use to be cake. I give that "cake" to a few people that really like cake, but hate bread. They eat the cake, and then I tell them they technically just ate bread. Now they don't speak to me for a week or never again because I deceived them and made them eat something that they hate.
It doesn't matter what the people are up in the head, if they come out as male, they are male. Then they go and have an operation and become female. That doesn't not change that fact that they use to be male.
I don't care what a person has had done to make himself look like a woman, if I find out that person use to be a man, I will forever consider that person a man. "She" had surgery, she is a fake woman.
It is like any other situation when I find out something is fake. Take a woman's breasts for example. If I like the looks of them, they will turn me on. If I some how find out they are fake, BOOM, I don't find them attractive in the slightest anymore. I don't find women that have had elective plastic surgery, to be attractive. It tells me that they are vain and most likely have personality issues that I don't care for.
When it comes to relationships, I only want what is natural. A girl that use to be a guy, isn't natural.
Yeah, absolutely. As soon as the relationship starts getting serious, and most certainly before anything physical occurs. Indeed, I'd consider sex with a partner who doesn't know to be rape by deception.
LetalisK: Yes, a trans should tell a person they're about to have sex with. To do otherwise is to violate the other's right to make an informed choice. And honestly, what kind of trans would want to fuck someone who has a serious problem with trans? There is no reason not to tell the other person.
Going back to the OP, the main topic is telling when dating, so that really means at any time. Then after that, the secondary part is about not being able to make babies, sex part.
I want to ask you: Why did you skipped the dating part and answer only about the sex part?
The reason I ask is that many people are only mentioning telling before sex and nothing else. Plus, there are the people that say that it is okay not to tell during the dating, but before sex it has to be told.
Why are people ignoring the point of the initial pick up and first date and normal dating stuff that comes before jumping in the sack?
Is the guy's time that is wasted during the dating process just not that important?
I find it important. The guy could have turned "her" down right away after being told she use to be a guy, then he could move on and find an actual girl.
People seem to only be half thinking about the guy in the relationship. Sex without telling him is bad, but it's fine and dandy to not tell him before that and waste large amounts of time in his life and possibly money before that.
lisadagz: If a black person picks up a white person at a bar, and the white person is blind, do you think the black person should say "Oh, by the way, I'm black," out of respect for the possibility that the white person may be racist so that the racist person knows what they're getting into and can back out?
snip
Actually it is quite believable that a blind person can be racist. The person could have had sight most of his life and been racist, and then something happened to him and now he is blind.
So lisadagz explanation works perfectly in that situation.
You're taking my post far too seriously and seemed to have missed the opening sentence I wrote in bold.
I never objected to any of it or said it wasn't an appropriate explanation. I simply had a good laugh about a funny concept.
You're taking my post far too seriously and seemed to have missed the opening sentence I wrote in bold.
I never objected to any of it or said it wasn't an appropriate explanation. I simply had a good laugh about a funny concept.
Well, thing is, I find this topic to be quite a serious matter, and I don't find joking about it funny at all. So, it isn't that hard to me to miss such thing, even in bold, or ignore it, and make a comment.
You're taking my post far too seriously and seemed to have missed the opening sentence I wrote in bold.
I never objected to any of it or said it wasn't an appropriate explanation. I simply had a good laugh about a funny concept.
Well, thing is, I find this topic to be quite a serious matter, and I don't find joking about it funny at all. So, it isn't that hard to me to miss such thing, even in bold, or ignore it, and make a comment.
I can understand missing part of a post because you're passionate about something. However, if you truly believe that humor cannot be funny in relation to certain subjects, I feel sorry for you, I truly do.
Jaeke: WTF is with the Escapists obsession with transgender/transsexuals, its just unnatural and who cares? And yes they must tell them immediately.
We have a few transgenders, transexuals here and a few people with gender identity disorder, we don't have an obsession with them but its good to talk about these issues with each other like adults. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it bad, bad to you, not to others.
About it being unnatural?, wearing clothes, travelling in a metal structure which burns fossil fuels such as car's, trains and planes and microwaves are also unnatural. Caesarean section's are unnatural.
Don't get me started on non dairy cheese products.
Just gotta say, im reading through this thread, facepalming at so many emotional charged and logically lacking argument (from both sides, but there are a few good ones), and I almost stood up and applauded at this.
Going back to the OP, the main topic is telling when dating, so that really means at any time. Then after that, the secondary part is about not being able to make babies, sex part.
I want to ask you: Why did you skipped the dating part and answer only about the sex part?
I blame the large amount of alcohol I've consumed lately as well as....
The reason I ask is that many people are only mentioning telling before sex and nothing else. Plus, there are the people that say that it is okay not to tell during the dating, but before sex it has to be told.
Conceptions that serious dating and casual dating entail different rules and serious dating starts at sex?
Why are people ignoring the point of the initial pick up and first date and normal dating stuff that comes before jumping in the sack?
I can understand this one, as "Hey, I'm a tranny" is a bit more on the too heavy side for a first date. First dates are a dime a dozen, those are there to get the general feels for someone, not necessarily to learn some of their deeper secrets.
Is the guy's time that is wasted during the dating process just not that important?
I find it important. The guy could have turned "her" down right away after being told she use to be a guy, then he could move on and find an actual girl.
People seem to only be half thinking about the guy in the relationship. Sex without telling him is bad, but it's fine and dandy to not tell him before that and waste large amounts of time in his life and possibly money before that.
*shrug* I have no answer for this beyond what I said above. I also haven't dealt with this much, as I evidently come across as a very trustworthy man. You wouldn't believe some of the incredibly dark, depressing, and horrific secrets women have told me on first dates. My god....
Well, that's a problem, because this guy has spent three months in that relationship with "her", he's been a complete gentleman and has taken her out many times and paid for everything. Then he finds out that naturally, "she" is really a he, which rightfully so, he goes ballistic and breaks up with "her", because he is into real girls, and doesn't consider "her" real, because it really is just a bunch of cosmetic surgery that is covering "her" up.
Choosing you pay for everything is your problem. If you're gonna do stuff like that, suck it up. Or you could quit the pseudo-generosity. I have no sympathy for some sap who thinks the money he spends is anything more than a gift that requires no obligation in return.
Because "she" waited three months to tell him, he wasted three months of dating time and money that he could have used on a natural girl in a relationship that could actually go somewhere.
Well if he just told every girl he met that she better not be a transsexual her time would be saved. If you feel so strongly go ahead and tell everyone you meet. Otherwise, suck it up.
So, she would have to be crazy not to realize that a vast majority of men would turn her down if she outright said she use to be a man. In reality, that really has to be the reason that "she" wouldn't want to tell a man the truth.
What? Now that's just pathetic. You have such a ridiculous persecution complex that you can't even imagine why someone who is in an heavily discriminated against group wouldn't tell someone... except to get in a relationship with you? If only that was a joke. Next time, when you say 'in reality', try to remain in reality instead of some weird fantasy land where it's all about you.
Jaeke: WTF is with the Escapists obsession with transgender/transsexuals, its just unnatural and who cares? And yes they must tell them immediately.
We have a few transgenders, transexuals here and a few people with gender identity disorder, we don't have an obsession with them but its good to talk about these issues with each other like adults. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it bad, bad to you, not to others.
About it being unnatural?, wearing clothes, travelling in a metal structure which burns fossil fuels such as car's, trains and planes and microwaves are also unnatural. Caesarean section's are unnatural.
Don't get me started on non dairy cheese products.
Just gotta say, im reading through this thread, facepalming at so many emotional charged and logically lacking argument (from both sides, but there are a few good ones), and I almost stood up and applauded at this.
axlryder: Seriously, guys, there's no need to write "her" or "him" in quotations. They are the gender they claim to be.
I don't see it that way.
You are saying that if a person claims to be something, they are something.
What if surgeons grafted large amounts of cat fur over my body, and gave me whiskers on my face and attached a tail to my butt?
If I walked up to you and told you, "I am a cat", would you believe me? If people argued and said that I am only a human, would you come to my defense and say, "since he claims to be a cat, he is a cat"?
If people did that, I would call them humans, doesn't matter what they did surgically to make themselves look like cats.
You are saying that if a person claims to be something, they are something.
What if surgeons grafted large amounts of cat fur over my body, and gave me whiskers on my face and attached a tail to my butt?
If I walked up to you and told you, "I am a cat", would you believe me? If people argued and said that I am only a human, would you come to my defense and say, "since he claims to be a cat, he is a cat"?
If people did that, I would call them humans, doesn't matter what they did surgically to make themselves look like cats.
Don't be an idiot. There's no physically possible way that cat genes could wind up in a human's DNA unless you're some kind of mad scientist tampering with the laws of reality. Humans cannot be naturally born with cat brains.
Contrary to what you may believe, there is actually scientific research on the subject which, while not 100% conclusive does show that transsexuals share similar brains to gender they claim to be. (Which is something that homosexuals do not share in common, no matter how much people may like to throw trans and homosexuality into the same camp and love to tell trans people to just shut up and be gay.)
As it is, it's also extremely possible that children can get wrong doses of hormones while in the womb and develop a mismatched brain for what their chromosomes entailed. Birth defects happen all the time, including other bizarre outcomes such as intersex and this seems to be the most likely reason at the moment.
I'm not going to stop you from disagreeing, but if you're going to go around judging other people come up with a better reason than that that illogically asinine and outdated argument.
Don't be an idiot. There's no physically possible way that cat genes could wind up in a human's DNA unless you're some kind of mad scientist tampering with the laws of reality. Humans cannot be naturally born with cat brains.
Contrary to what you may believe, there is actually scientific research on the subject which, while not 100% conclusive does show that transsexuals share similar brains to gender they claim to be. (Which is something that homosexuals do not share in common, no matter how much people may like to throw trans and homosexuality into the same camp and love to tell trans people to just shut up and be gay.)
As it is, it's also extremely possible that children can get wrong doses of hormones while in the womb and develop a mismatched brain for what their chromosomes entailed. Birth defects happen all the time, including other bizarre outcomes such as intersex and this seems to be the most likely reason at the moment.
I'm not going to stop you from disagreeing, but if you're going to go around judging other people come up with a better reason than that that illogically asinine and outdated argument.
You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
I was never talking about DNA and such, only the original and then the fake, surgical appearance.
I don't believe that someone should reveal their sexuality/transgender self upon first meeting. If they decide to pursue a date/relationship/physical contact/sexual contact/sexual intercourse, then that's when they need to be a little more open.
Sonic Doctor: You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I understood perfectly fine what you were trying to say. Doesn't make it any less of a completely asinine analogy which makes your argument look ridiculous beyond belief.
You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
I was never talking about DNA and such, only the original and then the fake, surgical appearance.
What an absolutely one sided and closed mind you have. It is our DNA/Genetic make up that makes us who we are. Not only that, but any person with female only body parts is female, and vice versa for males. It is silly people that have this opinion that make the life forthose people who NEED the operation, HELL. I happen to know a transexual, and one who has had the operation. SHE went through years of hell, including manic depression and attempted suicide on more than one occasion, all because society treat her with your 'once a man always a man' style of attitude. Go do some research, and understand the term/situation, before you make a bigoted view.
Don't be an idiot. There's no physically possible way that cat genes could wind up in a human's DNA unless you're some kind of mad scientist tampering with the laws of reality. Humans cannot be naturally born with cat brains.
Contrary to what you may believe, there is actually scientific research on the subject which, while not 100% conclusive does show that transsexuals share similar brains to gender they claim to be. (Which is something that homosexuals do not share in common, no matter how much people may like to throw trans and homosexuality into the same camp and love to tell trans people to just shut up and be gay.)
As it is, it's also extremely possible that children can get wrong doses of hormones while in the womb and develop a mismatched brain for what their chromosomes entailed. Birth defects happen all the time, including other bizarre outcomes such as intersex and this seems to be the most likely reason at the moment.
I'm not going to stop you from disagreeing, but if you're going to go around judging other people come up with a better reason than that that illogically asinine and outdated argument.
You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
I was never talking about DNA and such, only the original and then the fake, surgical appearance.
Everyone is born physically female to begin with.. technically you started out a girl
KelsieKatt: Don't be an idiot. There's no physically possible way that cat genes could wind up in a human's DNA unless you're some kind of mad scientist tampering with the laws of reality. Humans cannot be naturally born with cat brains.
Contrary to what you may believe, there is actually scientific research on the subject which, while not 100% conclusive does show that transsexuals share similar brains to gender they claim to be. (Which is something that homosexuals do not share in common, no matter how much people may like to throw trans and homosexuality into the same camp and love to tell trans people to just shut up and be gay.)
As it is, it's also extremely possible that children can get wrong doses of hormones while in the womb and develop a mismatched brain for what their chromosomes entailed. Birth defects happen all the time, including other bizarre outcomes such as intersex and this seems to be the most likely reason at the moment.
I'm not going to stop you from disagreeing, but if you're going to go around judging other people come up with a better reason than that that illogically asinine and outdated argument.
You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
I was never talking about DNA and such, only the original and then the fake, surgical appearance.
Everyone is born physically female to begin with.. technically you started out a girl
BORN physically female? I think you got that somewhat wrong.
You totally missed what my analogy was about. Plus I never said anything about genes or DNA, I just mentioned grafting on pieces and changing parts.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
I was never talking about DNA and such, only the original and then the fake, surgical appearance.
Everyone is born physically female to begin with.. technically you started out a girl
BORN physically female? I think you got that somewhat wrong.
nope, everyone in conceived female, its a chemical mutation process that makes you male by the time you come out.. (born/conceived... this isn't the debate for that issue)
Jaeke: WTF is with the Escapists obsession with transgender/transsexuals, its just unnatural and who cares? And yes they must tell them immediately.
We have a few transgenders, transexuals here and a few people with gender identity disorder, we don't have an obsession with them but its good to talk about these issues with each other like adults. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it bad, bad to you, not to others.
About it being unnatural?, wearing clothes, travelling in a metal structure which burns fossil fuels such as car's, trains and planes and microwaves are also unnatural. Caesarean section's are unnatural.
Don't get me started on non dairy cheese products.
Just gotta say, im reading through this thread, facepalming at so many emotional charged and logically lacking argument (from both sides, but there are a few good ones), and I almost stood up and applauded at this.
We have a few transgenders, transexuals here and a few people with gender identity disorder, we don't have an obsession with them but its good to talk about these issues with each other like adults. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it bad, bad to you, not to others.
About it being unnatural?, wearing clothes, travelling in a metal structure which burns fossil fuels such as car's, trains and planes and microwaves are also unnatural. Caesarean section's are unnatural.
Don't get me started on non dairy cheese products.
Just gotta say, im reading through this thread, facepalming at so many emotional charged and logically lacking argument (from both sides, but there are a few good ones), and I almost stood up and applauded at this.
and I smh at the comment.
smh?
slapped more hobbits? saw mandy's horse? shat my hat? Ha "shat my hat" that sounds like an awesome Dr Seuss book.
It isn't exactly the dishonesty is what people in the thread seem pout off by, it's the dishonesty of the person not to reveal they think they are a different gender and have went through surgery to try and "fix" this and then hid the fact from the person.
But by the same standards of honesty, one should disclose their colour to a perspective partner who couldn't otherwise tell.
If someone is ok with going out with a transsexual then fair play to them. I haven't got anything against people who would go out with transsexuals, in fact I haven't got anything against transsexuals. Except one thing, and that is I would not go out with one or have any sort of intimacy with them, I don't find it attractive and to me that person is still a man. Sorry if they get offended but they would have offened me for kissing me or doing anything else and not telling me they used to be a man beforehand.
Right, you don't have any problem with transsexuals, except for an extremely bigoted and hurtful view of them. Gotcha.
We are just going to keep going in circles but I will end with saying not saying your skin colour is completely different to not saying you attempted to change your sex and were actually born a different sex.
Also, you (like quite a few others on here) don't shine a good light on yourselves by calling anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view a bigot.
Really, when you go "Our situation is completely understandable, it's YOU that has the problems and are bigoted", it just makes people dislike you.
Jaeke: WTF is with the Escapists obsession with transgender/transsexuals, its just unnatural and who cares? And yes they must tell them immediately.
We have a few transgenders, transexuals here and a few people with gender identity disorder, we don't have an obsession with them but its good to talk about these issues with each other like adults. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it bad, bad to you, not to others.
About it being unnatural?, wearing clothes, travelling in a metal structure which burns fossil fuels such as car's, trains and planes and microwaves are also unnatural. Caesarean section's are unnatural.
Reminds me of a joke comedian Russel Howard made;
"Can you stop doing that it's not natural!"
"You're flying"
Don't get me started on non dairy cheese products.
You are saying that if a person claims to be something, they are something.
What if surgeons grafted large amounts of cat fur over my body, and gave me whiskers on my face and attached a tail to my butt?
This is a fallacious notion, as assuming a surgeon does an ideal job (which will become more and more the case as cosmetic surgery develops, naturally), then there is literally no difference between a natural and crafted vagina.
All flesh is transitive, that is, we're all made of the same stuff. The only thing that defines any difference is how it is arranged. Vaginas are of the same substance as penises, cat fur is not of the same substance as the bare skin you are born with. NOTHING is added in a gender reassignment, the "new" organ is all the patient's.
Maybe if your genes were modified in such a way to make you grow your own tail, fur, pointy ears, whiskers, and paws, I might consider you a cat, but now we're just talking sci-fi speculations.
Your previous argument to my bread analogy is also rather misinformed, as hormone therapy (required for SRS), serves to either undo or completely prevent development of the patient's genetic gender. So it'd be more like the bread was somehow turned back into dough, or was never bread at all, where bread is a post-pubescent male or female.
PS: Yeah this doesn't really have TOO much to do with the topic at hand, but I find that a lot of commenters are going off on false assumptions about post-op individuals.
A Weakgeek: If you were the black person and found out that the blind person was indeed racist, would you be sad that you didn't get to have sex with him? If it was me, I certanly wouldn't be.
Certainly, but my point was more that we shouldn't all go around paranoid that people might have a problem with aspects of us so much that we should let them all know about these aspects. Some people have already said this but if people are prejudice then it's their issue and it should be up to them to screen their partners, not up to the other person to bring these things up to people just in case someone finds it weird or wrong.
KelsieKatt: I was just thinking about the practical implications of a 'racist' blind person, considering that blind people have never seen color or have any understanding of it. In particular I'm imagining how entertaining it would be to have such a conversation.
Ha, that'd be a good point but there's a lot more to race than color, and if someone's been brought up being told by their parents "Black people are all killers and thieves!" then "black" isn't just a color, to them it's a description of evil people!
(Sorry if you'd considered this and I just killed your joke for no reason.)
Sonic Doctor: So the proper analogy going with your food reference: I mix the ingredients together to make bread, I bake it, and bread comes out.
Then after a day or two, I do something to turn that bread into a cake. Said bread use to be cake. I give that "cake" to a few people that really like cake, but hate bread. They eat the cake, and then I tell them they technically just ate bread. Now they don't speak to me for a week or never again because I deceived them and made them eat something that they hate.
It doesn't matter what the people are up in the head, if they come out as male, they are male. Then they go and have an operation and become female. That doesn't not change that fact that they use to be male.
I don't care what a person has had done to make himself look like a woman, if I find out that person use to be a man, I will forever consider that person a man. "She" had surgery, she is a fake woman.
That's really weird, reading the beginning of your post I was expecting your conclusion to be the complete opposite.
Who would be mad that you gave them cake that used to be bread? Surely it'd be far more likely that they'd go "Wow, but that was so tasty and cake-like, it may have used to be bread but it's definitely more like cake now. Good job!"
Think of it this way; someone starts making a loaf of bread, by reading a recipe. They have a dough mix set up, but someone puts in a lot of sugar and butter and some other ingredients. When the bread comes out, it's a cake. It tastes like cake, it has the consistency of cake etc. Would you call it a bread loaf, though, because the original instructions said it was so, even though said instructions are no longer adhered to?
Actually it's more like this:
The baker has all the ingredients to make bread and also follows all the instructions and bread is made. Someone says "hey, that bread sure looks tasty XD" and the baker goes "Bread??? this is a CAKE" and starts covering it in icing, jam and cream in an attempt to make it look like a cake then he gets annoyed at anyone who points out that it is still bread.
I couldn't care less about what's going on up in people's heads. If a person is born, physically, a boy, I don't care what that person does to himself later, I will always consider that person male.
Why? You keep saying that, but you offer no reason why you polarize gender in such a way. Throughout the entire history of mankind, gender has been a fluid concept and transgender people have had a place in just about every culture on Earth. There is no scientific or biological basis for you claim that "maleness" or "femaleness" is a set, unchanging essence ontologically grafted to a penis or a vagina. It isn't even that way in non-human species! You're free to be as ignorant as you want, but stop asserting that somehow your incredibly reductionist, simplistic claim is based on anything but your own ignorant views of outdated gender modes.
With that said, I think I would definitely like to be told if the woman I was sleeping with was born a man, just because such a life path would have a tremendous influence on the way that she dealt with sex and relationships. Just like if I would want to know if my partner was sexually abused or born to wealthy parents or a world-class violinist, I think it's important to have any potentially influential life events out on the table so a relationship can proceed onward. But any man who would be like "EWWWW YOU USED TO BE A DUDE GROSSSS" needs to grow the fuck up.
Matthew94: The baker has all the ingredients to make bread and also follows all the instructions and bread is made. Someone says "hey, that bread sure looks tasty XD" and the baker goes "Bread??? this is a CAKE" and starts covering it in icing, jam and cream in an attempt to make it look like a cake then he gets annoyed at anyone who points out that it is still bread.
Except a transgender woman is not "covered with" anything; her body is biologically the equivalent of yours. You're describing a drag queen, not a legitimate transwoman. Do you think that a transgender person is someone who just puts on a lot of makeup?
Also let's stop with the gender in quotes please. It's annoying.
peruvianskys: But any man who would be like "EWWWW YOU USED TO BE A DUDE GROSSSS" needs to grow the fuck up.
Or you could realise that having that response isn't necessarily just somebody being too immature to deal with things and that it stems from a natural psychological reaction...
And also that putting this hypothetical man's speech in all caps doesn't make your argument any stronger. Who's to say that somebody who has that reaction wouldn't express it rationally and maturely?
The reason most people's perceptions of male and female are pretty fixed and polarised is because most of the time, that's true. Most of us don't come into contact with transexual/transgendered people very often. You can't blame people for feeling uncomfortable around things they aren't at all used to.
Think of it this way; someone starts making a loaf of bread, by reading a recipe. They have a dough mix set up, but someone puts in a lot of sugar and butter and some other ingredients. When the bread comes out, it's a cake. It tastes like cake, it has the consistency of cake etc. Would you call it a bread loaf, though, because the original instructions said it was so, even though said instructions are no longer adhered to?
Actually it's more like this:
The baker has all the ingredients to make bread and also follows all the instructions and bread is made. Someone says "hey, that bread sure looks tasty XD" and the baker goes "Bread??? this is a CAKE" and starts covering it in icing, jam and cream in an attempt to make it look like a cake then he gets annoyed at anyone who points out that it is still bread.
How about you think of it this way, a baker makes a delicious cake, but it looks a bit like bread. So everyone looks at it and goes, "Oh, what lovely bread" and "Gee, I'd sure like that bread". So eventually the baker goes, "Enough is enough!", and rebuilds the cake so it looks more like a cake. And most people go, "Oh, sorry, I guess it was a cake all along. What lovely cake!"
However, some people keep going to the cake and going, "Well, this cake may be a cake, and it may look like a cake, and it may, in fact, taste like a cake, and the baker may of intended it to be a cake, but at one point in it's history people thought it was bread (even though it wasn't), and to my mind that means it will always be bread." These people then demand that the baker inform them whether or not the cake they are buying was ever perceived by the majority to be bread, because if they find out that the cake they just ate (even if they enjoyed it) was once perceived to be bread, then they have been tricked by the mean, nasty baker. Because they hate bread, and just ate something that neither looks, tastes or was meant to be bread, so therefore they have eaten bread.
Alright, that analogy is a little bit weird, but, to be honest, you can't really attribute human characteristics to baked goods anyway.
someonehairy-ish: On the one hand, I'd like to think that if I like someone enough then I'd be ok with them being a post op transsexual.
On the other hand, holy shit this girl used to have a penis. Ohgodohgodohgod D:
So. Yeah. Make of that what you will.
I think that's the basis for the hope of 'If I date them for a bit, but don't tell them right away, this could work'.
If you tell someone right away, even if that person is on the fence, they'll shut you down - almost guaranteed.
If you wait, let them get to actually know you, develop an attraction (emotional) to you, and then tell them. Suddenly they have a real question, now it's 'we have something, is this person I know and care about worth it' as opposed to 'there's nothing here yet, is this stranger worth it'.
Some will still shut a trans person down, but some will be shaken by their connection to the trans person, and will keep giving it a legitimate shot, and that's really (i think) the best a trans person in this day can hope for.
That analogy doesn't work in this situation, because the transsexual was already one thing before the operation.
So the proper analogy going with your food reference: I mix the ingredients together to make bread, I bake it, and bread comes out.
Then after a day or two, I do something to turn that bread into a cake. Said bread use to be cake. I give that "cake" to a few people that really like cake, but hate bread. They eat the cake, and then I tell them they technically just ate bread. Now they don't speak to me for a week or never again because I deceived them and made them eat something that they hate.
It doesn't matter what the people are up in the head, if they come out as male, they are male. Then they go and have an operation and become female. That doesn't not change that fact that they use to be male.
I don't care what a person has had done to make himself look like a woman, if I find out that person use to be a man, I will forever consider that person a man. "She" had surgery, she is a fake woman.
It is like any other situation when I find out something is fake. Take a woman's breasts for example. If I like the looks of them, they will turn me on. If I some how find out they are fake, BOOM, I don't find them attractive in the slightest anymore. I don't find women that have had elective plastic surgery, to be attractive. It tells me that they are vain and most likely have personality issues that I don't care for.
When it comes to relationships, I only want what is natural. A girl that use to be a guy, isn't natural.