It's true what you say about women having doube standards, I went to a theme park with three of my female friends, one of whom was wearing a very short skirt, but for some reason I got their annoyance for wearing a mildly clevage-revealing top. Maybe it's just jealousy (I am somewhat better endowed than most of my friends)
As for the woman's double standards? I imagine it's to do with the fact that the girl in the picture you were looking at is a) unrealistically proportioned. Even as an anime fan myself I have to ask how any man will ever look at me twice if that's the kind of girl he idealises - whereas I at least have a chance of looking like a model in a magazine some day so that doesn't irk me half as much. And b) it's pretty much socially acceptable to look at 'lads mags' whereas it's not quite so acceptable to look up anime girls just for their breasts as this woman doubtlessly thought you were, she probably just saw the character's chest size and jumped to the conclusion that that was the only reason for you to be looking at it.
It's entirely possible the OP missed an opportunity to start a discussion with a pretty girl because he was so self conscious. So, instead she moved on to men with more confidence.
I also should have included that I understand what you were saying and that being leered at is very uncomfortable. And my case is rare, it really only happens at the all girls school, and only because of the type of people who go to all girls schools
Heh. I went to an all-girls school. I never wanted to, but my mum wouldn't let me go to the local one with boys because it was a `Slut factory`. But I totally know what you mean, all girls schools can be like prison. xD
Oh good, I was slightly worried that I would have offended someone with that comment, but hey there's still time right? XD
My (all-girls school) was known locally as "The Whore House on the Hill" - nice, huh? ;O) Didn't feel like a prison, mainly becuase it was on 4 different sites, so we'd have to change sites at least once a day, maybe more, BUT having that many bitchy, hormonally-challenged pubescent girls concentrated in a small area was rarely fun for the 7 years I was there!
By the way OP: Know that phrase "bitches be crazy?" tis funny cause it's true! I'd bet women wouldn't be so sensitive about them if they weren't so bloody OBVIOUS, and in some people's case, sodding awkward. Le sigh.
Phasmal: Some guy you dont know with his eyes down your shirt is usually not a pleasant experience, because the guys who dont see the need to be subtle about it are most commonly the same kind of guys who dont see the need for other things... like soap.
Tis true!
Phasmal: `You are your tits! Tits are great, but dont show them off or you are a whore!`.
Tits or legs. you can have one matching pair out at a time, but not both. Low top + short skirt = slaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag. Apparently. (Converting to Islam and/or wearing a burqa would solve the ogling problems, but prob. not the being stared at problem.)
Heh. I went to an all-girls school. I never wanted to, but my mum wouldn't let me go to the local one with boys because it was a `Slut factory`. But I totally know what you mean, all girls schools can be like prison. xD
Oh good, I was slightly worried that I would have offended someone with that comment, but hey there's still time right? XD
My (all-girls school) was known locally as "The Whore House on the Hill" - nice, huh? ;O) Didn't feel like a prison, mainly becuase it was on 4 different sites, so we'd have to change sites at least once a day, maybe more, BUT having that many bitchy, hormonally-challenged pubescent girls concentrated in a small area was rarely fun for the 7 years I was there!
Now imagine and all girls college (which is what this was) where most of the girls had a person reason to go there, and only 20% or so went there for financial reasons, or because the school had the program they desired.
I was almost on your side until you posted the video near the end. Now I don't know if you're admitting to being obsessed or just trying to make an additional statement.
She was probably bent out of shape because that picture depicts an unrealistically proportioned woman. This was probably amplified being that the woman isn't real but an Animated Character.
So the thought process may be: Artificially created female + Probably drawn or Designed by a man = Male Fantasy, Unrealistic Woman.
At the very least, the women in that magazine are real, regardless of if they may have had their breasts done. Or maybe it was just as bad and she didn't happen to notice.
Whatever the case, her argument is valid.
I'm betting the women in their magazine were quite artificial as well.
Necroid_Neko: It's true what you say about women having doube standards, I went to a theme park with three of my female friends, one of whom was wearing a very short skirt, but for some reason I got their annoyance for wearing a mildly clevage-revealing top. Maybe it's just jealousy (I am somewhat better endowed than most of my friends)
As for the woman's double standards? I imagine it's to do with the fact that the girl in the picture you were looking at is a) unrealistically proportioned. Even as an anime fan myself I have to ask how any man will ever look at me twice if that's the kind of girl he idealises - whereas I at least have a chance of looking like a model in a magazine some day so that doesn't irk me half as much. And b) it's pretty much socially acceptable to look at 'lads mags' whereas it's not quite so acceptable to look up anime girls just for their breasts...
I don't think even these biggest Japanese love pillow raping weirdo thinks that they will ever find someone proportioned like an anime character. Also, he said that the picture was just what was on the wiki page. Not that he actively sought the picture to silently rub himself through his pocket.
Micalas: I don't think even these biggest Japanese love pillow raping weirdo thinks that they will ever find someone proportioned like an anime character. Also, he said that the picture was just what was on the wiki page. Not that he actively sought the picture to silently rub himself through his pocket.
As the now ex-girlfriend of a severe anime fan I can safely tell you that yes, some men do indeed expect to find women who look like that.
Also I'm aware that's not why he was looking it up, but the woman in his story didn't know that hence why I phrased it such. *edits her post* There we go, hopefully it won't get misinterpreted now :)
Just wanted to throw this out there: A study looked at where men look on girls during porn, and found that most of the time they were looking at their face.
I'm betting the women in their magazine were quite artificial as well.
I did mention the potential of them having surgery.
There is also the stronger likelihood of it being doctored by a graphic designer. It is still just as likely that these women are natural. You don't really know unless you see the picture.
That isn't the point though. You can only push an image of a real woman so far before people go "This is obviously fake". A drawing on the other hand isn't based on reality. It is conceived and designed.
Someone viewing a drawing of a big chested woman stands out because it was designed to be perverted. However, a woman that just so happens to have a big chest is not necessarily perverted unless she poses provocatively or had surgery done. Stating it once more, it could have been a perfectly normal woman in a bikini. It's an empty speculation.
Regardless, one is designed the other 'is". One is more obviously controlled than the other.
Women with hips are my fetish. I love a woman with a standard skeleton structure.
OT: I don't really care for tits that much, they're just kind of filler. I'm more of a leg man myself.
I can hazard a guess as to why women get bent out of shape about it, though. It probably has something to do with the apparent obsession with them, they get a lot more attention than the rest of the body from a lot of people.
Consider them the MLP of anatomy. Yeah, there are a lot of shows that people obsess over just as much, but MLP gets more attention than most and is now hated by a lot of people for it. How I Met Your Mother would be the legs of course.
Forlong: Instinctively, most men are very attracted to large breasts.
The obsession for boobs is actually relatively new, rather than being something born out of instinct. Boobs are only shaped the way they are because we have stupidly shaped mouths. Check out apes, most have round mouths and only nipple.
How many other genders do you know that have boobs?
In answer to your question, what the woman said to you is the reason they get so bent out of shape about it. Men are generally very interested in breasts. This is because large breasts imply a very fertile and healthy woman. Instinctively, most men are very attracted to large breasts.
But you are right about the double standard she had. What if those other guys were objectifying women? You certainly weren't, and you where the one being told off. That is not fair, but life hardly is.
I must be one of the few that aren't. I actually find large breasts to be a... well turn off. Anything larger than a C is... blegh. To me, a fertile women has to be:
In good shape Cute (as hottness tends to go away when you age, but cute lasts a lot longer) And shares my interests.
I don't get why people have an obsession with large asses or large breasts. Or Large women for that matter.
Micalas: I don't think even these biggest Japanese love pillow raping weirdo thinks that they will ever find someone proportioned like an anime character. Also, he said that the picture was just what was on the wiki page. Not that he actively sought the picture to silently rub himself through his pocket.
As the now ex-girlfriend of a severe anime fan I can safely tell you that yes, some men do indeed expect to find women who look like that.
Also I'm aware that's not why he was looking it up, but the woman in his story didn't know that hence why I phrased it such. *edits her post* There we go, hopefully it won't get misinterpreted now :)
Oh he's one of those people that we anime fans don't talk about. The kind that doesn't just have love pillow sex, but love pillow orgies with multiples different pillows. I'm going to have to ask that you pretend that it never happened, pretend you never knew him, and just let my team take care of this. You saw nothing.
I'm betting the women in their magazine were quite artificial as well.
I did mention the potential of them having surgery.
There is also the stronger likelihood of it being doctored by a graphic designer. It is still just as likely that these women are natural. You don't really know unless you see the picture.
That isn't the point though. You can only push an image of a real woman so far before people go "This is obviously fake". A drawing on the other hand isn't based on reality. It is conceived and designed.
Someone viewing a drawing of a big chested woman stands out because it was designed to be perverted. However, a woman that just so happens to have a big chest is not necessarily perverted unless she poses provocatively or had surgery done. Stating it once more, it could have been a perfectly normal woman in a bikini. It's an empty speculation.
Regardless, one is designed the other 'is". One is more obviously controlled than the other.
I see what you're saying but I take issue with the idea that the fact that a character drawn with large breasts is perverse by default. To suggest that is to suggest that large breasts are inherently perverse. Are the majority of large-breasted characters given large breasts for mostly sexual reason? You bet. But it's not impossible for a character to just have a large bust. Please note I'm refering to "normal" large not cartoonishly large.
I don't think breasts are more 'off-limits' than most other parts of the female body, but they are more noticeable than the vagina, and even if a woman is wearing a moderate amount of clothing, you can at least get an idea of how big they are, and compare different women based on their 'assets'.Comparing vaginas, though, requires more research.
Also both men and women have asses, so it's not as much of a 'female' thing.
But I guess some women feel like they are being constantly sized up and judged based on the size of their cleavage, and while the society is similarly obsessed with the size of men's genitals, you'd have to wear a rather revealing clothing for the size difference to show.
I like breasts myself, but I like them reasonably-sized, and think the idea of 'bigger-the-better' is silly.
As for the OP, I think the woman was being rude, it's not like you were bothering her. If you were minding your own business, why should she care?
Kendarik: It's entirely possible the OP missed an opportunity to start a discussion with a pretty girl because he was so self conscious. So, instead she moved on to men with more confidence.
And I think it's entirely possible you are correct. That is what I thought initially as well.
I see what you're saying but I take issue with the idea that the fact that a character drawn with large breasts is perverse by default. To suggest that is to suggest that large breasts are inherently perverse. Are the majority of large-breasted characters given large breasts for mostly sexual reason? You bet. But it's not impossible for a character to just have a large bust. Please note I'm refering to "normal" large not cartoonishly large.
That argument would only fly if the woman looked proportionate.
The example given by the OP does not. There is no way, short of implants, that a woman who looked like that could get breasts that are that big. To pretend for a second that this wasn't done for sex appeal is a bit of a stretch.
I'm sure that there are animated characters who have a large bust within reason, but the stereotype is over-the-top unrealistic.
I see what you're saying but I take issue with the idea that the fact that a character drawn with large breasts is perverse by default. To suggest that is to suggest that large breasts are inherently perverse. Are the majority of large-breasted characters given large breasts for mostly sexual reason? You bet. But it's not impossible for a character to just have a large bust. Please note I'm refering to "normal" large not cartoonishly large.
That argument would only fly if the woman looked proportionate.
The example given by the OP does not. There is no way, short of implants, that a woman who looked like that could get breasts that are that big. To pretend for a second that this wasn't done for sex appeal is a bit of a stretch.
I'm sure that there are animated characters who have a large bust within reason, but the stereotype is over-the-top unrealistic.
Yup, first rule to men. When a woman starts a conversation, CONTINUE IT.
"lol, yeah, the cartoon women really are overdone, I wish they would draw them more realistically". Then actually talk to the girl...
I see what you're saying but I take issue with the idea that the fact that a character drawn with large breasts is perverse by default. To suggest that is to suggest that large breasts are inherently perverse. Are the majority of large-breasted characters given large breasts for mostly sexual reason? You bet. But it's not impossible for a character to just have a large bust. Please note I'm refering to "normal" large not cartoonishly large.
That argument would only fly if the woman looked proportionate.
The example given by the OP does not. There is no way, short of implants, that a woman who looked like that could get breasts that are that big. To pretend for a second that this wasn't done for sex appeal is a bit of a stretch.
I'm sure that there are animated characters who have a large bust within reason, but the stereotype is over-the-top unrealistic.
I wasn't commenting specifically on the picture in the OP but looking at it again, I'm sure Kim Kardashian could pull off the character in a live action adaptation. That said, the character was most definitely drawn that way for sex appeal. It's obvious by the way the clothes are drawn. My argument for that character specifically would probably be a little stronger if she buttoned up though.
octafish: I thought this would be a conversation about Lady Aribeth. My mistake.
And I thought it was going to be about Jigglypuff. -_-'
Spoiler: Click to 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
Yup, first rule to men. When a woman starts a conversation, CONTINUE IT.
"lol, yeah, the cartoon women really are overdone, I wish they would draw them more realistically". Then actually talk to the girl...
Mr Cwtchy: Why would you want to converse with a girl who feels the need to lecture people she doesn't even know?
Eh? It's a discussion forum. We're discussing. I don't see the problem. I think things have been going rather smoothly.
The hardest thing in the world is opening a conversation with the opposite sex when you are young.
Even if the girl said, word for word, when the OP claims, the tone or thinking behind it is biased by his own insecurities. He didn't say ANYTHING in return, that, combined with his obvious dislike of the "jocks" suggests that he just assumes it was negative.
It's actually a perfect opening for a conversation if the guy has the brains to respond to it. She could easily have meant it in a teasing way. Or she could have just been having a bad day and a friendly response would have opened the door to more in the future.
Kendarik: Even if the girl said, word for word, when the OP claims, the tone or thinking behind it is biased by his own insecurities. He didn't say ANYTHING in return, that, combined with his obvious dislike of the "jocks" suggests that he just assumes it was negative.
It's actually a perfect opening for a conversation if the guy has the brains to respond to it. She could easily have meant it in a teasing way. Or she could have just been having a bad day and a friendly response would have opened the door to more in the future.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you were commenting on the futility of internet arguments. That makes much more sense.
I see what you're saying but I take issue with the idea that the fact that a character drawn with large breasts is perverse by default. To suggest that is to suggest that large breasts are inherently perverse. Are the majority of large-breasted characters given large breasts for mostly sexual reason? You bet. But it's not impossible for a character to just have a large bust. Please note I'm refering to "normal" large not cartoonishly large.
That argument would only fly if the woman looked proportionate.
The example given by the OP does not. There is no way, short of implants, that a woman who looked like that could get breasts that are that big. To pretend for a second that this wasn't done for sex appeal is a bit of a stretch.
I'm sure that there are animated characters who have a large bust within reason, but the stereotype is over-the-top unrealistic.
Yup, first rule to men. When a woman starts a conversation, CONTINUE IT.
"lol, yeah, the cartoon women really are overdone, I wish they would draw them more realistically". Then actually talk to the girl...
As long as he doesn't actually use the word "lol"
First rule to women, if you don't know me, and try to lecture me be prepared to get told to fuck off
Kendarik: The hardest thing in the world is opening a conversation with the opposite sex when you are young.
Even if the girl said, word for word, when the OP claims, the tone or thinking behind it is biased by his own insecurities. He didn't say ANYTHING in return, that, combined with his obvious dislike of the "jocks" suggests that he just assumes it was negative.
It's actually a perfect opening for a conversation if the guy has the brains to respond to it. She could easily have meant it in a teasing way. Or she could have just been having a bad day and a friendly response would have opened the door to more in the future.
Or she could just be a judgemental(perhaps even sexist) bitch like her quote seems to pretty obviously suggest to me, considering I have no earthly clue how: "What, if they're not a C cup or better they're not good enough for you?" can possibly be intended as 'teasing'.
Regardless, the OP didn't even bring up trouble with women, how is that even relevant? Fact of the matter is, he was minding his own business, she came up and criticised him with no provocation.
Spoiler: Click to ViewPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly9pbWFnZXM1LmZhbnBvcC5jb20vaW1hZ2UvcGhvdG9zLzI2ODAwMDAwL0ppZ2dseXB1ZmYtYW5pbWUtMjY4MzY2MjAtMzIwLTIxMy5qcGciIGFsdD0iaW1hZ2UiLz48YnIgLz48aW1nIHNyYz0iaHR0cDovL3Byb2ZpbGUuYWsuZmJjZG4ubmV0L2hwcm9maWxlLWFrLXNuYzQvNTAyNzBfMzI5MTI4ODUxMTc4XzQ5MjMwOTVfbi5qcGciIGFsdD0iaW1hZ2UiLz48L3A+CjxwPk90aGVyIHRoYW4gdGhpcyBzdHVwaWQgcG9rZS1qb2tlLi4uIEkgaGF2ZSBub3RoaW5nIHRvIGFkZC48L3A+
I only came here because that's what I thought this was going to be about...
Phasmal: Are you seriously moaning you cant oogle tits IRL?
I think in the context of this situation he's annoyed that some random stranger came up and rather obnoxiously chastised him and characterised him as a lecher one minute, then turning around and acting perfectly amiable towards the football guys who were observing equally explicit material. Now leaving the content to on side, the action of pestering someone over their reading material seems increadibly invasive on its own merits. If I'm sat on the bus minding my own business and reading a book/magazine/whatever and then some random guy/girl comes up to me and opines 'Hah! You're reading that?! That's shit! God, you're such a loser!' then my automatic inclination is to coldly reply something along the lines of 'Yeah, I don't recall asking for your opinion' (provided I can't snap up something wittier) and then continue to diligently ignore them and get back to my reading. For the other person to expect any other kind of response really just speaks to their arrogance. Anyway, getting back to the situation at hand, the girl in this scenario really comes off like an absolute tool. Now bear in mind, I'm not trying to generalise here, or say this is something women do (I see plenty of guys do this), I'm merely talking about the women in question and anyone like her regardless of gender/orientation who behaves in this contradictory manner, I would not hesitate to label them as such. Anyone who vehemently speaks their mind around people they have no romantic/sexual interest in and then immediately drops their principles and hides their true feelings on the matter the moment they're faced with attractive, potential suitor's in the hopes ingratiating themselves with the guy/girl/intermediate just for the sake of companionship further down the line, comes across as extremely fickle.
Regnes: Also your example isn't a double standard.
Uh, yeah, it kind of is:
Double Standard: A set of principles that allows greater freedom to one person or group than to another.
Dress it up as being some kind of biological imperative/social Darwinism all you like, that still doesn't change the fact that the girl in question is allowing greater leniency to the football guys, than people like the OP. She's abandoning her convictions to ingratiate herself with one group of people in spite of committing a certain action, while deriding/lecturing another group of people for committing the same action. Ergo, there is a double standard. Now then, if the OP is saying that this is a double standard is something that happens on a large/majority scale or that it is only employed by women, then I disagree. There are more than enough shallow men who will brazenly insult someone they have no romantic interest in and then turn right around and won't dare to say anything that might risk offending the pretty girl so they can keep their chances with them alive. This is also something the 'why do women only date jerks?' crowd seems to overlook, men are perfectly capable of being just shallow and or disingenuous as (in fact I would argue more so than) women. Perhaps I'm going far off topic with that, but just wanted to establish that kind thing isn't unique to either gender and to the OP I would say; the girl is a tool, don't worry, forget about her, but also don't use that one person as some kind of representation for the behaviour patterns for an entire gender. Anyway, getting more to general topic at hand; tits. OP, look dude, I don't know if there exists some kind stigma about oggling some girls funbags being necessarily more offensive than eyeing up any other part of her body, but I would imagine most women would take umbrage with you outright leering at any part of her body for an extended period of time. Whether it be jock or nerd who's doing it, staring at someone like that is more likely than not going to creep them out, being well built generally isn't going to net you a free pass, it's the behaviour not the person doing it that people find dodgy/unnerving. Perhaps it's that eyefucking someone's cleavage is more conspicuous than eyeing up their legs or whatever, but in any case you shouldn't be doing something that's going to make them feel uncomfortable. Sure, everyone takes quick glances when checking someone out, but for the love of the maker, be subtle about it, don't give prolonged gazes and bloody salivate over them. As for the grand scheme of things and representation in media, well many (keeping vague so as not to generalise) guys kind of have a fixation with breasts and for many women this can be a source of insecurity. So when you have female characters, whether they be animated or live action all ridiculously stacked while being super skinny as well, landing themselves in obsequious and totally impracticle poses it becomes rather immediately obvious what demographic they're pandering towards. In the grand scheme of things, I guess my only answer for why there is such a fixation with breasts in the media and what have you is that they are the most conspicuous aspect of the female form and the easiest to exploit to spike up male viewership (I...think that's a word...) but I seriously doubt it's that much more offensive than objectifying any other body part. At any rate OP, that double standard isn't exclusive to either gender and it's the staring that's creepy regardless of whether it's the tits, ass or legs your vision is fixed upon. That's my belated two cents at least.
Kendarik: The hardest thing in the world is opening a conversation with the opposite sex when you are young.
Even if the girl said, word for word, when the OP claims, the tone or thinking behind it is biased by his own insecurities. He didn't say ANYTHING in return, that, combined with his obvious dislike of the "jocks" suggests that he just assumes it was negative.
It's actually a perfect opening for a conversation if the guy has the brains to respond to it. She could easily have meant it in a teasing way. Or she could have just been having a bad day and a friendly response would have opened the door to more in the future.
Or she could just be a judgemental(perhaps even sexist) bitch like her quote seems to pretty obviously suggest to me, considering I have no earthly clue how: "What, if they're not a C cup or better they're not good enough for you?" can possibly be intended as 'teasing'.
Regardless, the OP didn't even bring up trouble with women, how is that even relevant? Fact of the matter is, he was minding his own business, she came up and criticised him with no provocation.
Facts we don't have matter...like was she a C cup? lol
You have no idea what she intended, I'm telling you are a woman that couple have been teasing to open the conversation without making the girl feel vulnerable. Any criticism was in his head based on what's presented.
Kendarik: The hardest thing in the world is opening a conversation with the opposite sex when you are young.
Even if the girl said, word for word, when the OP claims, the tone or thinking behind it is biased by his own insecurities. He didn't say ANYTHING in return, that, combined with his obvious dislike of the "jocks" suggests that he just assumes it was negative.
It's actually a perfect opening for a conversation if the guy has the brains to respond to it. She could easily have meant it in a teasing way. Or she could have just been having a bad day and a friendly response would have opened the door to more in the future.
Or she could just be a judgemental(perhaps even sexist) bitch like her quote seems to pretty obviously suggest to me, considering I have no earthly clue how: "What, if they're not a C cup or better they're not good enough for you?" can possibly be intended as 'teasing'.
Regardless, the OP didn't even bring up trouble with women, how is that even relevant? Fact of the matter is, he was minding his own business, she came up and criticised him with no provocation.
Facts we don't have matter...like was she a C cup? lol
Or she could just be a judgemental(perhaps even sexist) bitch like her quote seems to pretty obviously suggest to me, considering I have no earthly clue how: "What, if they're not a C cup or better they're not good enough for you?" can possibly be intended as 'teasing'.
Regardless, the OP didn't even bring up trouble with women, how is that even relevant? Fact of the matter is, he was minding his own business, she came up and criticised him with no provocation.
Facts we don't have matter...like was she a C cup? lol
Nope. Flat-chested.
See, there you go, perfect opening. "Yes, they do look silly, I have no idea why they draw comics that way. Personally I prefer a more natural look in a woman".
It's true what you say about women having doube standards, I went to a theme park with three of my female friends, one of whom was wearing a very short skirt, but for some reason I got their annoyance for wearing a mildly clevage-revealing top. Maybe it's just jealousy (I am somewhat better endowed than most of my friends)
As for the woman's double standards? I imagine it's to do with the fact that the girl in the picture you were looking at is a) unrealistically proportioned. Even as an anime fan myself I have to ask how any man will ever look at me twice if that's the kind of girl he idealises - whereas I at least have a chance of looking like a model in a magazine some day so that doesn't irk me half as much. And b) it's pretty much socially acceptable to look at 'lads mags' whereas it's not quite so acceptable to look up anime girls just for their breasts as this woman doubtlessly thought you were, she probably just saw the character's chest size and jumped to the conclusion that that was the only reason for you to be looking at it.