Woah Woah Woah. Okay, let's talk about women for a second. Pages PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NEXT | |
Now this is really quite refreshing. It's nice to see someone with the same opinion as me (i.e. the right opinion) on this; especially a woman, it's more common to see women either hating them or having no feelings on it. I find the demonization of being skinny ridiculous and it's always people who are trying to make anything from 'curvy' to 'oh my god why is there a whale on my front porch' acceptable. Models don't have to worry, though. I'll usually find them attractive and that's all anyone needs, isn't it; my approval? Of course it is. | |
I'd wager your mind was far away from the morbidly obese when you thought up that little point. All generalizations are bad generalizations. Mkay.
Oh I just love this sentence. It's... beautiful. | |
Yeah, well, opinions and buttholes. | |
My apologies. I thought by saying you "can't get behind" calling an end to "slut shaming", you meant that you support calling people sluts. So I assumed that this was something you do. | |
How does not eating in itself make someone a bad person? Who are they hurting apart from themselves? That said, I realise that people who deliberately eat less than they should and are not suffering from an eating disorder (or fasting for religious reasons) are probably doing it for attention. Which can certainly make someone an irritating person. | |
Really? Don't whine about Cyanide and Happiness. Its one of the greatest web comics ever. That one in particular made me laugh for a good bit. The boys who post on this forum hate women? Easy to understand why, I suppose. They're young, and haven't had any meaningful relationships yet. At their age, women are a mystery because they're too shy to actually talk to them and understand them. Understanding comes with experience. While I think you have good intentions, your posts are coming off as preachy and self-righteous. Let the sexually frustrated teenagers objectify women on a forum. As long as its not hurting anyone directly, I personally don't see a problem. | |
Naw, i just meant that i don't think it should end because i assumed it meant putting a cloud of shame or guilt over the heads of sluts, not the modern equivalent of public flogging. Also i could never get behind ending the name calling properly because i'd still do it in my head, which would make me kind of a hypocrite. I might change my mind about that someday when i'm more grown up and supposedly will have a better understanding of the world or whatever, but it's not happening now. | |
Sorry to say, but you can't just tell people to stop embracing an age-old stereotype. Guys who have sex with lots of women are called studs and girls who have sex with lots of men are called sluts. I don't necessarily agree with it, but that's how society has been shaped. I agree, women have the same right to having as much sex as they like, but society will most likely be still looking at them as slutty. Just another example of sexist sterotypes. They're not even that hard to find. | |
Here here! Slut shaming and fat shaming is one of the things that get's me really, really annoyed. People who do it just seem arrogant to me. We're a very judgemental society really, some people being more judgemental than others. Everyone is held to arbitrary and often stupid standards (for every women who is shamed for being fat, there's a man who's shamed for not having a well-paying job and a child who is shamed for not having a ton of friends). It's bullshit really. | |
On the subject of clothing and slut shaming I'm pretty torn even if I am generally progressive. I can't help but feel slightly offended by a woman dressing "like a whore". I realize this is all very subjective and everyone is free to live as they want but I think the underlying motivations for what people do have to be brought into question or at least be criticized. If my daughter ever tries to leave the house with pants pulled up to expose half her ass like a monkey, damn right I'm grounding her. I mean, in all honesty. If a woman chooses to dress "like a whore", doesn't that mean that she wants to be seen "like a whore" and is therefore just giving the OK to being treated "like a whore"? I'm playing devil's advocate by this point but I want to know which part of my thinking is wrong. I always assumed slut shaming had to do with critizising a woman for being "loose", I never considered it was about how she presented herself to the world. Anyway, Come at me, bro or whatever. P.S. I will accept that this POV is just an extreme reaction to the fact there are hordes of mysoginistic assholes as a valid argument. | |
I got to ask, are you on some kind of crusade for the female race? I knew I remembered your avatar from the "friend zone" thread, so I clicked on your profile and you mostly just post in stuff "women" related. There isn't anything wrong with that (I'm for equality as much as the next guy!) but you seem to be focusing on JUST women. What about male models? They're not expected to be super skinny, but they're expected to be muscular. Is that right? Should they be forced to bulk up because that's what society thinks an attractive man looks like? What about women in the friend zone? It happens a lot more than you might think, yet your previous thread spoke as if it's only an occurrence that men have to deal with. Let's go back to the slutty thing. Do these laws relate to men as well as women? Because the way you're talking, the slut-label regarding how much skin a person shows or how much they sleep around is only a stigma attached to women. The day old complaint that "if a man has loads of sex he's praised but if a woman does it she's a slut" doesn't hold up any more. Modern equality is a lot more present than a lot of people seem to want to admit. I don't want to sound like I'm having a go, I just want you to take into account that men and women have the same problems. Admittedly, yes, stuff like anorexia is far more common in women than men but how many men do you think have taken steroids to improve their body for just the same reasons women develop anorexia? Always look on flip side of the coin. | |
The OP of that thread asked people to comment on supermodels, then spent the rest of the thread flat out attacking posters for their opinions, the bulk of which amounted to: "I don't care for supermodels" or "they are overpaid clothes horses". Just saying. OT: So long as they accord me with the same basic courtesy I show them, I don't care if a woman is fat or thin, old or young, pretty or ugly. (The same goes for men, too.) I'm not saying everyone has to be supernice friends with each other, but I don't go out of my way to antagonise or judge people based on how they look or dress, and I expect the same in return. | |
While I agree completely, I have to say I truly and thoroughly dislike the fashion industry and the image they promote with super-thin women modelling for them. Sometimes it feels as if they set the standard for what is considered "beautiful", and that pisses me off. | |
It's hurting our community by making it a shitty place to be for women. | |
Actually, I didn't say it. The Constitution did. You can condemn anything you want. I can condemn bimbos for being bimbos, you can condemn me for condemning them, and so on. Telling me to "stop," however, puts you squarely in the wrong. You have every right to denounce my opinions. You have NO right to forbid them.
Reading comprehension FTL. You're the one that was trying to dictate what other people should find attractive with your item #5, not me.
Sure. As soon as you post in this thread, explicitly, that you unconditionally accept: A. Institutionalized rape, slavery, and genocide in Africa Until you do, I'll be executing my right to employ my own gift of reason to dismiss you as not knowing WTF you're talking about.
Let's be fair. When one's older and has a good number of relationships under his belt, there's still a good chance he'll hate women. The difference he'll just have empirical justification for it! ;) | |
I've only met one person to my knowledge who has worked as a model. She's quite cool, in fact she's my girlfriend, %100 of the model's I have met have been cool. My anecdotal evidence > your anecdotal evidence. | |
Was right there with you until all that. Not everyone is equal, and not all bodies are good bodies. There are definitely bad bodies out there, and that applies to both genders. Let's not get carried away in your desire to be accepting of differences. | |
heh, I knew I should've put a disclaimer. Women aren't the only people who get 'bashed' here. As a matter of fact, had the op not made this thread I would have never thought that it was an issue in the least. I've not seen any hate directed specifically towards women. As a matter of fact, its my experience that in game forums women are actually put on a pedestal. I know that a gamer girl is much more attractive to me than one who doesn't share my interests. Its why I married my wife. =) Anyways, everyone gets fucked with on the internet. Men, women, gamers, gays, straights, blacks, whites, etc. If you don't have a thick skin, then its definitely not a place you should frequent. Woman-bashing in particular doesn't get a 'pass'. Its the internet. Anyone can say what they damn well please, and they will. Is there a rule for that?
True, but its fine to let them believe otherwise until then. I know that illusion made high school and college a lot easier to handle. | |
If you haven't seen any hate directed at women here you probably haven't been looking very hard, it's not hard to find. And I guess if you are a lady it kind of sticks out. And I wasn't talking about the internet; I was talking specifically about here. | |
I hate to break it to you, but most of the "nice guys" that you've described are nerds/geeks | |
It does get pretty tiresome, though most of it goes over my head now. I always remind myself that the demographic here is largely teenage boys, and their attitude towards women tends to improve when everyone (boys and girls) grows up a bit. | |
There are several (bullshit) reasons for it: 1. Guys believe that shunning the professionally gorgeous will paint them as the kind of guy that doesn't go for superficial beauty... so, y'know, hopefully others will do the same. It's about their own insecurity, particularly in those that feel their own looks are "below average." 2. It's a common belief that if someone is really good at one thing, it must mean they're really bad at another (ergo pretty = jerk). Alternately, the belief is that being really good at something means you "sold your soul" in some other aspect of life (ergo thin = bulimic). It's our way of making the world fair in our minds. 3. It's an over-application of the "real women have curves" logic. Yes, real women do. And some real women don't. And some real women have large noses, while other real women have small ones. Real women have bodies of all sorts. 4. If I'm not personally attracted to it, it is objectively bad. Anyone who is attracted to it is either lying, scheming, or stupid. (In fairness, this goes the other way, too. It's for some reason not okay for a person to say, "I'm just not attracted to men/women I consider fat," which is why people have to cook up other reasons to explain why they aren't attracted.) So the problem is on all sides. People just need to be able to accept that people are attracted to different things. Hollywood, et al, will aim for whatever they believe to be the most common preferences, because that's where the money is. It's okay to not be attracted to big people. It's okay to not be attracted to small people. It's okay for me to hate onions and for everyone else to love 'em. In the event that there is misinformation, bias, or selfish thinking behind a preference, that's for that person to deal with -- and it's not there every time, so there's no reason to villainize those whose preferences differ from our own. | |
Trying really hard to resist the urge on this...
No, yes, no and no. I will judge anyone and everyone I feel so inclined to. I will call people out on their idiotic behavior. I will stop people from acting on bullshit behavior. I will call someone fat, because they are fat (a spade being a spade and all). I don't have to be accepting of anything beyond the reality they choose to impose on themselves. If someone is not prepared to accept the consequences of their actions and the reactions to their choices, then they should not take or have them. One can only be disgraced if you are ashamed of yourself and your actions. It is not shaming to call a slut a slut. If they feel ashamed of it, that is their own problem, not mine. I do not feel ashamed for anyone calling me an asshole when I don't consider their emotional well being in my responses. Definitions do not inherently posses condemnations; they are merely descriptors. If I call someone a fat, lazy, idiotic prostitute; it's because she's 200lbs, doesn't do anything for work outside sex, doesn't use condoms and exchanges sex for money. Yet somehow I'm the insulting one? Well, wouldn't be the first time this thread has demonstrated irony. | |
Think about it for a second. They hold no facial expressions, don't speak, and do nothing but demonstrate clothing in various scenarios i.e. what a mannequin does. Don't get me wrong, my own job is much more demeaning and much lower paying, but the simple fact of the matter is that it's an apt comparison to what they do. Hate the system, not the messenger. I bet these women are incredibly interesting people, but you couldn't prove it by me because I don't know any models personally and they rarely get the opportunity to express their individuality through their profession. It's unfortunate.
As a lifelong heterosexual, I concur. Men, stop it. Women, also stop it. I don't use terms like sluts or whores and it annoys me when women are called these things in private. Men, it's counter productive. You like sex with women? Stop telling them it's a bad thing. Women, when you slut shame, it's more a reflection on self hatred and your need to put down others to elevate yourself (possibly because you don't enjoy sex yourself). Makes you sound like a 7th grader, too. Sex is nice. If you don't like it, stop having it, but don't put down other sex enthusiasts because you don't like it. It's why I don't post on My Little Pony boards - it's just not for me. | |
I'm not trying to be self righteous, or preachy but I can see how I'm coming off that way. I have a lot of feelings on the subject of objectifying woman. The thing is, there ARE women in this community (such as myself) who probably don't like seeing their gender being dehumanized or talked badly about or being talked about like we're another species. It's irritating. | |
Truer words have rarely been spoken. For my money I don't see why anyone would want to honestly. When a whore leaves she just takes a few hundred bucks. When a housewife leaves she takes half your worldly possessions and then slaps ya for alimony and a pile of legal bills to suck what's left away. Whores FTW! | |
What do you personally gain by calling people names? People can feel ashamed of themselves and their actions without you trying to deliberately hurt their feelings. And when they aren't ashamed of their actions, they just see a guy attempting to deliberately hurt their feelings. Not only that, but people who aren't the intended targets might hear what you say and feel a sense of shame for things they haven't even done. It's just not nice. (Insert counter argument about how "I don't have to be nice!!!!" "I don't have to be politically correct!") Saving some time. No, you don't have to be nice to people. But people who aren't nice make things slightly blander, the world less interesting, and people not as willing to go out for fear of running into individuals such as yourself. It's makes it harder to reach out to people. As I said, it's unproductive. | |
What happened to "sticks and stones..."? Serious question. I dont go out of my way to insult people but still... | |
i agree with the OP. no need to be hatin yall. | |
"Sticks and stones" was meant to reassure/empower those who are forced to endure taunting and ridicule. It's not really intended to reassure/empower people to be free with insults. It's kind of the whole "Freedom of Speech" thing. A certain demographic seems to labor under the misunderstanding that "Freedom of Speech" means "Freedom to be an enormous asshole, free of all consequence or censure". | |
I am not on a crusade exactly, I made the friendzone post because I've been seeing an obnoxious abundance of friendzone memes, so I made a post to rant my view on it. And of course, there was misogyny there. So I've kind of gone into feminist mode. This thread was made because I made the mistake of reading through the super model thread. Like, I knew I shouldn't have clicked on it, because I knew it was going to make me angry, but I did anyway. I'm probably a mental masochist. But yeah, here we are. I have posted in a few other threads completely unrelated to women, just not a lot recently. And of course a lot of the laws relate to men as well as women. The thing is, in the model post, from what I could stomach of it, no one mentioned male models, no one hates on them. In that thread someone referred to models as "walking skeleton freaks", or a "glorified picture frame". All these awful comments were directed towards female models. Male models weren't even mentioned because no one seems to hate on them. And not all male models are huge and buff, quite the opposite actually. Generally male models are toned but not ripped. Unless they're in an athletics catalog or whatever. Yes, men can sleep around too, it's their right. But generally, (at least in my experience) guys don't get nearly as much crap for sleeping around as women do. | |
"Stick and stones may break your bones, but I'm going to try as hard as I can to hurt you with my words as possible." To say that words hold no power is ridiculous. I tried and tried throughout my childhood to make myself believe that idiom, but it just doesn't work. Some of us on this planet are all sensitive and shit. There are worse things than becoming a kind and accepting person. It's not necessarily a bad thing. I know it doesn't win you any awards or make you any friends, but it makes it easier to sleep when you think more highly of people. No reason to take on the baggage of others because you've found reasons to not like it. Why waste even a second of your mental capacity judging another person? | |
Oh I know, but I made the distinction because most "nice guys" are nerds/geeks, but most nerds/geeks aren't "nice guys". At least I hope not. | |
Modeling is a fairly ugly industry. It's mercenary and cut-throat, and it seems to take a heavy psychological toll on its constituents. I have a hard time taking issue with discouraging anyone...woman or male...from endorsing the industry in its current state. However, I agree that spewing bile at the models themselves is probably not the best way to go about it. Misdirected anger at best, naked misogyny at worst. And by the way, you don't need to rationalize your desire to talk about women's issues and not spend an equal amount of time doting on men's. This is a goddam forum, you can talk about whatever you want to talk about. If I wanted to make a thread celebrating the scrotum I should feel free to do so, and somehow I doubt women would storm it demanding equal time for the vagina. The same should apply here. For some reason every time a thread appears in these forums with even a whiff of estrogen around it, a certain demographic feels threatened, panics, and loses their minds. | |
| Pages PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NEXT | |
It sickens me that people are still convinced that everyone's different and that having certain preferences/traits is a sin/crime.
Whether you're gay, a woman, black, asian, shemale or anything else you should always have the same rights as everyone else...