Yes |
43.2% (60) | |
No |
56.1% (78) |
Poll: The Mutant registration act/Superhuman Registration Act Pages PREV 1 2 | |
Sorry about that. What's wrong with Stormwatch? It should be a viable option in a world where super powered heroes live. I'd rather have an agency policing superheroes and villains then what amounts to political hogwash like registration acts are. | |
Assuming this is a hypothetical comic-type universe we're talking about I would have to say no. Considering New York city has incredible regenerative powers and the heroes we are trying to tie down are consistently saving the world from the brink of the abyss every other day I don't see how a government registration act would actually accomplish anything at all. It was a dumb idea in Civil War and it would be a dumb idea in any other universe that operates on the same rules. | |
I thought the entire point of a "right to bare arms" was that people could hold firearms to prevent the policeforce/government from holding power of force over them. No matter how corrupt the police get we still have that. And we do have SOME policing of our own protectors. Mutants cant be matched by your every day man. Ever. Under any circumstances. Which really puts us at a disadvantage. | |
It's one of those things. If it was based on discrimination like the Mutant registration acts were then no. If mutants weren't being discriminated against and there were superhumans in the mix then yes. That was the difference to me. There were superhumans but the only ones who had to register were mutants. But if all super powered humans had to register then i would support it. even if i was a superhuman. | |
Either way the average person is fucked :/ | |
Spot on. Using your eyes to see is a privilege, not a right.[1] Do remember that for a number of superhumans, their abilities are simply a part of who they are and what they can do - just like walking or seeing or hearing. In many cases, their powers are simply the ability to do those things better than most people. While I agree that superhumans should be registered, said registration should NOT have the major flaws with most of the presented registration acts. In most editions, the Mutant Registration act is set up for Mutantism[2] and the Superhuman Registration Act in Civil War had a clause for conscription into the armed forces. | |
if i had super powers i wouldnt really care what the govournment did...i wold just fly around | |
Realistically you'd need something like that. As someone else pointed out, if you have to register firearms and cars. Then really you should have to register superpowers, whether you were born with them or not is irrelevant. The majority are far more deadly than any firearm, and the odd few are more deadly than WMD's. A world as we know it couldn't function without some sort of registration system. Because the vast majority of us aren't altruistic, so it stands to reason that if you give us superpowers that isn't going to change. I think the villain to hero ratio would be ridiculously out of whack. You'd probably need some sort of well paid and supported, public force of super-powered beings that worked like a police force or military. If it was made to be respectable but still accountable, it might take away the negative connotations and neutralise some of the danger of letting people with destructive abilities roam around unchecked. | |
Note: this is assuming what we're talking about is similar to the cause of Marvel: Civil War. If there's somebody who would do something illegal, making it twice as illegal isn't going to help. We all know how DRM only ever affects the people who bought the thing it's attached to. It's like that. | |
I like the idea of teams run like stormwatch and I feel that there would be a place for teams like stormwatch but if someone has something they can use as a weapon be it organic or technological it has to be known so as to protect people. | |
So, a Stormwatch like organization would be phase 2 in your ideal situation. That makes sense. Without sounding too much like a racist, I like the idea of a Mutant Registration Act more than a SHRA. Here's the thing: with a few exceptions, Marvel Mutants are driven more by personal philosophy than abstract notions of right and wrong. When the conflict was about how to expose themselves to the world, Magneto and Professor X were on opposing sides. When that conflict was resolved, Magneto and Xavier went back to being friendlier towards each other. Now they are on the same side, both being members of Scott Summers' Mutant Messiah cult. The current conflict in the X-men appears to be on how they best survive in the world after M day. Scott Summers wants to lock themselves away. Wolverine wants everyone to be allowed to make their own fate within the world. I'm more worried about that than secret identities of not mutant heroes. With the non mutant super powered beings, I don't think a SHRA is necessary. They choose to be good and evil. Spiderman chose to be good. Fantastic Four chose to be good. Green Goblin chose to be evil, so did the Frightful Four. They rarely, if ever, change sides. | |
Considering my superpower would be mind manipulation (Not mind control. Never mind control. Just stuff like making people forget I've been there, for example.), such an act would of course be beneficial to me. *rubs hands in glee* Me? Mutant/Superhuman? No, you must have the wrong one. No problem, officer, you're just doing your job. Yes, have a good day yourself. 'sides, I'd not use my power to gain any significant unfair advantage. I lead a modest lifestyle, and I'd keep doing so...it's just less of a hassle. | |
Right I agree with what you're saying here. | |
I've given this issue some thought and I do believe I would support this type of act. If we lived in a hypothetical world where Superheroes existed, I'd want someone to keep an eye on them, and have plans to take any of them down should they go rogue, which some heroes have a tendency to do regularly. Not even getting into the Supervillains. So, yeah I'd be in favor of registration, if it's done properly then the threat to their secret identities would be a minimal issue if a completely non existent one. And the actual heroes would still be free to do their heroing. | |
Honestly, while people like Robert Kelly were supreme douchebags, they weren't really bad guys as far as their political agenda concerning mutants was concerned. Like in the first X-Men movie, Senator Kelly makes mention that there's a mutant girl who can phase through walls (Kitty Pryde), and how ridiculous it is that people would argue you shouldn't be keeping tabs on somebody like that. Gun registry acts keep the public safe because it keeps tabs on who has a gun and who doesn't, sure there are people who slip through, but overall it helps a lot. A mutant registry would keep the public safe, because honestly a lot of mutants shown in the series have powers they could easily use to wreak havoc with, and a lot of them have. People like Magneto prove time and time again that they need to keep tabs on all of these suckers. | |
| Pages PREV 1 2 | |
Supported on the basis that it wouldn't be an open system like anybody could see your power or identity just by looking for your name in a search engine. If somebody wants to reveal themselves then they could but they shouldn't be forced to.
Of course, I'd also say to that people with superpowers could become "heroes" but only if they demonstrate they're stable people. Train them all to use their powers responsibly but not let them become vigilantes. They could use their powers in self-defense and to perform a citizen's arrest but not become crime fighters if they're not signed up.