So this post on the "A man walks into a bar" thread
Bertylicious: A much more pertinent question would be to ask people if they'd let the stranger spunk in their bum-hole for 5 million. That way people will be able to recognise whether or not they are whores.
got me thinking, and since it wasn't the focus of the thread, I thought I'd make one for it, but alter the conditions. Forgive me if this sounds like the bad intro to a porn film or something.
So you're in the empty bathroom of a bar, doing your business, when a man in a suit walks into and stands besides you, admiring your junk. Assuming you don't go looking for these scenarios, you're shocked, finish and tuck it back in (and, if you're not freaked out already, you shout him down). He tells you that he'll give you £1 million if you let him fuck you in the ass, in broad daylight, in public. He says that he'll give you the money first upfront, but he has a gun in his pocket, and if you try to run away, he'll shoot you dead.
Would you accept or decline his offer?
EDIT: He gives you proof that he's done an STD test and he's clean.
I guess I might be willing to let him park his e-series in my rectum for a bit for that kind of money.
And now I have to clean up the drink I just spit out. Thanks for that XD
Anyway for a high amount of money, with a big enough sum, I could move away from the place where I'd been just been bummed, to somewhere where no one knows about it.
I'd take the million, wait till we leave the bathroom and are "in public", and then leave him standing there expecting a ride. He'll be perfectly free to complain about not being able to commit a crime all he likes.
If forced to deal straight with him, the answer is hell no.
Matthew94: Yeah, why not. As long as he could prove that he didn't have any STDs.
Hell, you might even enjoy it. Win-win I say.
That's one of the reasons I don't believe in God. What higher power puts a pleasure organ in a place where you have to shove something up your ass to get at?
Also, I'm reminded of this.
Ironically, the guy with the dick name was the one not being gay. Granted, he fits under this criterion:
but hey, they play games for a living. They're all kinda fuckin' weird.
Heronblade: I'd take the million, wait till we leave the bathroom and are "in public", and then leave him standing there expecting a ride. He'll be perfectly free to complain about not being able to commit a crime all he likes.
If forced to deal straight with him, the answer is hell no.
This
Because even if he does shoot me, at least he'll be caught and punished.
Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.
That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.
That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.
There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
manaman: Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.
That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.
That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.
There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
What are you on about? It was that other guy who said that it makes you a whore.
And of course, I'm "evidently homophobic". Because you know me in person, right? I didn't touch on the public shaming because the consequences of being done in public should be obvious. The only way it's wrong is if you morally object to letting a stranger have sex with you in public, as well as it being an illegal act itself. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation.
I guess I did kind of aim this question about men, however, so perhaps I should apologize for any offence that may've been taken, but that was not my intention. Jeez, people should just lighten up around here.
manaman: Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.
That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.
That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.
There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
What are you on about? It was that other guy who said that it makes you a whore.
And of course, I'm "evidently homophobic". Because you know me in person, right? I didn't touch on the public shaming because the consequences of being done in public should be obvious. The only way it's wrong is if you morally object to letting a stranger have sex with you in public, as well as it being an illegal act itself. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation.
You don't have to actually say (or type) a word or phrase to imply something. Wrongness is attributed to the entire scenario by the fact that you imply money is needed to coerce someone into doing it. Which is true, most people do not immediately have sex with strangers in public places just because they are asked nicely. The overall context is the wrongness of those actions. That more weight is held on the fact that is is a man asking another man than the public shaming it can lead one to believe that it is more important to you. Also the unneeded inclusion in the setup (especially they way it is worded) of a man looking at another man's penis makes it seem like that is a very real worry to you. Hence the evident homophobia.
I'm not saying you go around making fun of homosexuals. I'm not even saying you think about doing it. What I am saying is that homosexuality is confusing to you and confusing things cause people to be apprehensive about them, and that when they are apprehensive about them without know why they shy away from them and treat them differently. You probably shy away from other males in those confusing situations that can be intimate (and no sexual connotations are not what you should think of first with that word it means personal, private, close etc).
As for the rest of that statement which I have separated out here:
Relish in Chaos: I guess I did kind of aim this question about men, however, so perhaps I should apologize for any offence that may've been taken, but that was not my intention. Jeez, people should just lighten up around here.
That is the mother of all fake apologies. You are basically saying I must have been offended, and you are sorry that I was offended. Not even sorry that you caused offense through confusion. No it's all my fault I was confused and you are just sorry it happened. Not that I was offended anyway. I don't really have any basis to be offended. I'm not gay. I don't have any gay family members or friends. I supposed my sister could qualify as a whore, but that is all her choice. I was simply pointing out something.
A million pounds isn't enough to justify the very real possibility of being a convicted sex offender for life. I have no problem with the gay sex part, but the other details need some rejiggering.
How public is public? Does public mean just outside or in the middle of the busiest street in town?
Does the guy look like this?
Spoiler: Click to ViewPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly9pMC5reW0tY2RuLmNvbS9lbnRyaWVzL2ljb25zL29yaWdpbmFsLzAwMC8wMDYvOTA3L3VnbHkuanBnIiBhbHQ9ImltYWdlIi8+PC9wPg==
Or like this?
Spoiler: Click to ViewPHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly9yZWZyYWN0b3J5LnVuaW1lbGIuZWR1LmF1L3dwLWNvbnRlbnQvdXBsb2Fkcy8yMDExLzA4L2ZpZzEtbmljaG9sbHMuanBnIiBhbHQ9ImltYWdlIi8+PC9wPg==
Can I change the deal? Settle for less money if it's not in public, that sort of thing?
Gotta factor in the exchange rate as well. Right now, a million pounds is $1,606,714.738 AU. Not exactly an amount to sneeze at...
I'm a poor student who also, coincidentally, likes to take it in the ass on a regular basis. Even if I was straight, the cost of it would only be my pride, and perhaps a condom, whereas the gain would open up the entire world for me. Basically, the things that I could do, the things that I could gain with $1.9million (NZ) far outweighs the cost of a 20 minute public fuck.
I'd be willing to take it up the ass for far less money and without threat of death. I'd say, I dunno, $20,000 is the absolute bottom (pun) I will go. Just don't tell that to whoever is trying to buy rights to my anus. I want some negotiating power here. (Someone brought up the sex offender thing, so let's add the caveat of "not going to face legal consequences" for it.)
And no, I'm not gay. Sex and "humiliation" really don't bother me that much, especially with as painful and degrading as my current job is. Ever have to rub lotion on your bum because of the sweat and chafing from your minimum wage job? Buttholes heal and I can get over psychological wounds. I'd say two or three nights of lost sleep tops.
The OP reeks of homophobia (or trying to instigate some homophobia). Let me tell you something - "gay" is not contagious, at least not for me. I finally found that out recently. 100% straight and there's nothing I or anyone else can do about it.
Well I rather enjoy anal sex (I have some things that would make some straight men cower and cover their holes), so I would definitely accept his offer. Doing it in public just makes it more erotic >:3
Relish in Chaos: So this post on the "A man walks into a bar" thread
Bertylicious: A much more pertinent question would be to ask people if they'd let the stranger spunk in their bum-hole for 5 million. That way people will be able to recognise whether or not they are whores.
got me thinking, and since it wasn't the focus of the thread, I thought I'd make one for it, but alter the conditions. Forgive me if this sounds like the bad intro to a porn film or something.
So you're in the empty bathroom of a bar, doing your business, when a man in a suit walks into and stands besides you, admiring your junk. Assuming you don't go looking for these scenarios, you're shocked, finish and tuck it back in (and, if you're not freaked out already, you shout him down). He tells you that he'll give you £1 million if you let him fuck you in the ass, in broad daylight, in public. He says that he'll give you the money first upfront, but he has a gun in his pocket, and if you try to run away, he'll shoot you dead.
Would you accept or decline his offer?
EDIT: He gives you proof that he's done an STD test and he's clean.
I don't need a million quid so no. Seriously, I struggle to comprehend why anyone would say yes to this or a similar question. If you want to be rich, wouldn't you want to be rich to prove that you're better than other people? All the money-orientated people I know are this way inclined and quick money would be meaningless to them, even though they'd be more than happy to persue all manner of horrible means to make their money.
Everyone who said yes to this are the reason we are blighted with reality television. Fie on the lot of you!
EDIT: Unless you said yes because it has long been a sexual fantasy of yours. You live that dream you filthy diamond!
Of course I would. I'd give him fucking blowjobs and let him lick my ass passionately while I'm dressed as a fucking bunny I wasn't planning on letting a special lady take my ass virginity anyway.
Bertylicious: Seriously, I struggle to comprehend why anyone would say yes to this or a similar question. If you want to be rich, wouldn't you want to be rich to prove that you're better than other people? All the money-orientated people I know are this way inclined and quick money would be meaningless to them, even though they'd be more than happy to persue all manner of horrible means to make their money.
First off, 1 million pounds isn't going to make you "rich". Most of the people on this forum are young enough that they'd still have to work for a living after getting the million pounds. I don't want to be "rich" to prove anything. I want to live comfortably. I want to be able to enjoy myself and not have to worry about debts. Having a million pounds would make it so I could work, but also never have to worry about things like a mortgage or car payments. If I lost my job, I wouldn't be facing the repo man or homelessness.
manaman: Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.
That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.
That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.
There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
What are you on about? It was that other guy who said that it makes you a whore.
And of course, I'm "evidently homophobic". Because you know me in person, right? I didn't touch on the public shaming because the consequences of being done in public should be obvious. The only way it's wrong is if you morally object to letting a stranger have sex with you in public, as well as it being an illegal act itself. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation.
You don't have to actually say (or type) a word or phrase to imply something. Wrongness is attributed to the entire scenario by the fact that you imply money is needed to coerce someone into doing it. Which is true, most people do not immediately have sex with strangers in public places just because they are asked nicely. The overall context is the wrongness of those actions. That more weight is held on the fact that is is a man asking another man than the public shaming it can lead one to believe that it is more important to you. Also the unneeded inclusion in the setup (especially they way it is worded) of a man looking at another man's penis makes it seem like that is a very real worry to you. Hence the evident homophobia.
I'm not saying you go around making fun of homosexuals. I'm not even saying you think about doing it. What I am saying is that homosexuality is confusing to you and confusing things cause people to be apprehensive about them, and that when they are apprehensive about them without know why they shy away from them and treat them differently. You probably shy away from other males in those confusing situations that can be intimate (and no sexual connotations are not what you should think of first with that word it means personal, private, close etc).
You realize that you're the only person who's reacted this way to my thread, right?
Look, if you want, I'll go back and edit it out. I'm not even sure myself why I mentioned the part about the man looking at another man's penis. Maybe I thought that it might be somewhat important to the person to know about the other's intentions. But seriously, I don't need someone giving me some kind of psychology 101 when you don't even know me.
Relish in Chaos: I guess I did kind of aim this question about men, however, so perhaps I should apologize for any offence that may've been taken, but that was not my intention. Jeez, people should just lighten up around here.
That is the mother of all fake apologies. You are basically saying I must have been offended, and you are sorry that I was offended. Not even sorry that you caused offense through confusion. No it's all my fault I was confused and you are just sorry it happened. Not that I was offended anyway. I don't really have any basis to be offended. I'm not gay. I don't have any gay family members or friends. I supposed my sister could qualify as a whore, but that is all her choice. I was simply pointing out something.
Oh, for fuck's sake...
Fine. I'm done with you. If someone wants to lock this thread, then go ahead and fucking do it then.
Bertylicious: Seriously, I struggle to comprehend why anyone would say yes to this or a similar question. If you want to be rich, wouldn't you want to be rich to prove that you're better than other people? All the money-orientated people I know are this way inclined and quick money would be meaningless to them, even though they'd be more than happy to persue all manner of horrible means to make their money.
First off, 1 million pounds isn't going to make you "rich". Most of the people on this forum are young enough that they'd still have to work for a living after getting the million pounds. I don't want to be "rich" to prove anything. I want to live comfortably. I want to be able to enjoy myself and not have to worry about debts. Having a million pounds would make it so I could work, but also never have to worry about things like a mortgage or car payments. If I lost my job, I wouldn't be facing the repo man or homelessness.
Well shit, you're talking about taking it in the can or killing someone for mortgage payments. You can rent you know, nobody has to die or degrade themselves for you to live like a normal person.
Unless you're talking about freedom from drudgery, in which case what would you do with your time?
Bertylicious: Well shit, you're talking about taking it in the can or killing someone for mortgage payments. You can rent you know, nobody has to die or degrade themselves for you to live like a normal person.
Unless you're talking about freedom from drudgery, in which case what would you do with your time?
I don't find anything degrading about anal sex or prostitution. And the point about renting and a mortgage is that if you lose your job and can't pay rent, you get evicted. It's about financial security, nothing says financial security like a million in the bank (well, except for more cash). It'll cover all those gaps in your finances that you would otherwise have to take on debt for.
So this post on the "A man walks into a bar" thread
got me thinking, and since it wasn't the focus of the thread, I thought I'd make one for it, but alter the conditions. Forgive me if this sounds like the bad intro to a porn film or something.
So you're in the empty bathroom of a bar, doing your business, when a man in a suit walks into and stands besides you, admiring your junk. Assuming you don't go looking for these scenarios, you're shocked, finish and tuck it back in (and, if you're not freaked out already, you shout him down). He tells you that he'll give you £1 million if you let him fuck you in the ass, in broad daylight, in public. He says that he'll give you the money first upfront, but he has a gun in his pocket, and if you try to run away, he'll shoot you dead.
Would you accept or decline his offer?
EDIT: He gives you proof that he's done an STD test and he's clean.