Have cake and eat it, because I really like cake.

I believe in the second statement. Far as I know, it is not possible to eat your cake and have it, barring that you own the cake by eating it, and nobody else from that moment can have it but you.

If I had to choose from this list, #2 is the only one that makes sense to me.

But, my motto is, I'll have my cake and eat your's, too.

The point of the saying is that the person your describing is trying to do more than is possible, hence the first statement is the one that should be used.

Then again, now i think about it either makes sense in that context, just because the have comes first doesn't mean anything. Both statements say that you can make one cake into two and do both with it, which is impossible, but thats the point.

Technically you still have the cake if you eat it.

So both could be true.

Granted, the first does make more sense in terms of the meaning of the phrase but the first one sounds grammatically incorrect.

"To eat youre cake and have it" because surely there is nothing stopping me from eatting my cake when i have it.

I have never heard the first saying before. Was the second saying a mistranslation of the first saying?

Personally the First saying makes more sense to me. The second one is common sense and I don't think you would ever have to tell anyone that. (Unless the collected cakes or something)

In any case it dosen't change the fact that the cake is a lie.

Mr. Squirrel:
Have cake and eat it, because I really like cake.

chocolate cake

ffxfriek:

Mr. Squirrel:
Have cake and eat it, because I really like cake.

chocolate cake

Especially chocalate cake indeed.

Aren't both options true?

"You can't have your cake and eat it to! <--have first, eat second

"wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?" <--eat first, have second, thats the crucial difference we are discussing here.

the "too" at the end is crucial as well because if you have it there either arrangement means trying to do both things to one cake.

sms_117b:
There is a oldish saying:

"To eat your cake and have it" - where in you are getting the best of both worlds, your are eating your delicious cake and have it again to eat later, which is impossible.

However more and more I hear:

"To have your cake and eat it" - which is just common sense, I mean, if I have cake I'm going to eat it

So which do you all think is right as a saying?

Are you sure that the first isnt just a literal translation?

I'm not sure I want to eat my cake, it's just SO delicious and moist.

Mr. Squirrel:
Have cake and eat it, because I really like cake.

:) Same here.

It's very simple, you either have cake, or you've eaten the cake you had.

since the former is dimensionally fucked up, i'll choose the latter and hope its coconut flavored

Why do we need a phrase that means "The best of both worlds"? It's already a phrase. How about we just scrap all cake phrases and stick to world ones. If you have trouble with world phrases, then get out of my language, you insect.

if i eat cake and then have it... does that mean i get two cakes!? Screw the other option! gimme your fucking cake and cookies!

and then more cake!

Ponder this.

"I would like to have my cake, then place it into a fridge, and take small slices every day, once it is gone, I buy a new cake. And repeat. Until I die, or run out of money, or my cake store goes bankrupt. If the latter is the case, I go to a pie store."

How would you guys philosophically break down this metaphor?

Have your cake and eat it. You can't eat cake that you don't have.

The saying came from Marie Antoinette when she was told the People of France were starving and unable to make bread so she made the comment they should eat cake instead. The bitch latter got what she deserved when she met the guillotine.

The cake is a lie...(if you say otherwise may a dog violently rip out your throat after a vishiously short quick time event...)