Topic Index
Poll: A Caffeine Fuelled Inglourious Basterds Review


How many people think the Bear Jew is the greatest nickname for any character, ever?
HELL YEAH!
81.1% (43)
81.1% (43)
HELL NO!
17% (9)
17% (9)
Want to vote? Register now or Sign Up with Facebook
Username:Password:
Log In

image

Inglourious Basterds


Minor spoilers contained within - Read at your own discretion

"Remake" seems to be the word on Hollywood's lips of late.

Halloween, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Quarantine (or .rec, as it was originally known) to name but a few. Not to mention the remaking of John Carpenter's entire back catalogue with- putting it more politely than it deserves- results that make you want to shit blood.

It seems that they ran out of films to remake, so they remade World War II.

Thankfully, it's one Quentin Tarantino at the wheel.
I've found that the big QT can be a bit marmite. His fans say they love his verbose, stylistic methods and they way he seems to be in love with his actor's voices. His critics would say exactly the same thing, only with the words like "hate", "overly" and "too much" added in at certain points.
I'll let you put them in where they feel appropriate.

I guess this review will largely hang on whether or not I like marmite.
So, let's make some toast, get a knife and stretch this analogy to breaking point.

Yes, I like the works of Tarantino. I thought Reservoir Dogs was good, but for me his true classic was Pulp Fiction. Never before had characters been so gloriously realised on screen, and never before have so many people wanted to convert to the metric system.
So you'll be surprised, gentle reader, to hear that I hated Kill Bill. It actually bored my kidneys out- I've still yet to find them.
I mean it could be something to do with the fact that I find Uma Therman to be both as attractive and charismatic as a monkey's kneecap, or maybe the fact that it relied too heavily on lazy, nostalgic references to kung-fu flicks I've never seen[1] in lieu of story and character development. But I think it's mainly because, to me, it just didn't feel like a 'Tino.

Don't ask me about Jackie Brown, I haven't seen it. Or Death Proof. They're on my to-do list.

So daddy-o, I think I'll turn this introduction into a comfortable silence and get down to brass tax by starting my review of every anti-Semite's nightmare: Inglourious Basterds. Or I will as soon as I'm quite finished cramming in as many cheesy references as I can.

image

"I'm aware of what tremendous feats human beings are capable of once they abandon dignity."


Col. Hans Landa, over a glass of milk.

It is a gloriously sunny day. We see a French farmer in his shack.
Into his home steps a German officer. We will come to know this man as the Jew Hunter (right).
The German has a friendly face- an easy, charming smile even slinks across it.
We also see what's underneath the cool facade; a cold, ruthless efficiency and unrelenting determination to perform his lethal duty.
His oiled trench coat, black as onyx, brushes against the farmer's honest wooden floorboards. The officer proffers his hand in greeting, as if he is an old friend. They talk, but we do not hear the conversation, we hear the subtext. Through his charming, multilingual tones, Landa says over and over again "I know what you are hiding". From the moment he walks in, we know that we've met a new breed of villain.

From this we can deduce that not only do I love Christoph Waltz' performance, but that if I had a girlfriend we'd be having a long chat about the future of our relationship- particularly the part about the lack of prospects for children somewhere down the line.

Yes, it's a monumental performance and may even get an Oscar nod. It's the film's selling point and it's a joy to watch. I can almost recommend it for his soothing, eloquent tones alone.

... Moving on.

This kind of villain might overshadow any of the heroes in the piece. Thankfully, there aren't any.

"Mah name is Lootenant Aldo Raine, an' ah need me ate soljers."

Brad Pitt's Aldo Raine asking for volounteers... I think.

image

We all know that bringing down bullies makes for great guilty pleasures. We can all relate to it.
So when you consider the relationship between the Nazis and the Jews (I've heard it described as "rocky, at best") you can imagine that when they start the scalpin' and the maimin' that it truly is the guiltiest of guilty pleasures.

So to, when Brad Pitt bursts into rooms, emptying ammunition belt after ammunition belt into Nazis almost as fast as his female costars can tear their knickers off in his presence you won't be disappointed.

Oh wait, you will, because that isn't the film you're going to fucking get.

Yes, that's right, the trailers were complete fiction. Aldo Raine barely even raises his voice, let alone kills anyone. In fact, considering the film is named after them the Basterds get little screen time.

Okay, there are "ate" of them, but you'll only really focus on three. Pitt himself, he's pretty good I guess, although his South American drawl seems to be a little put-on from time to time. Til Schweiger as Hugo Stiglitz, the redemptive Nazi (if by "redemptive" you mean "kills Nazis"- and let's face it, that's good enough.) and one Sergeant Donnie Donowitz.

In fact let me stop to tell you about Donnie Donowitz. For me it was the most pleasantly surprising part of the film.
He is played by Hostel I&II director Eli Roth. I didn't like Hostel, so naturally I let that reflection go onto his acting abilities. But he's excellent.
Okay, not to the level of Herr Waltz- but a charismatic, vicious performance nonetheless. Also, with the best nickname ever: The Bear Jew, seen as a golem by the Nazis for his fury and aptitude with a baseball bat.
Just his youthful looks and muscly, toned bo-

What is with me today?

Now for spoiler/lazy/pace reasons I won't go into the rest of the cast too much. Just rest assured that you won't find a bad performance here, and especially not in Diane Kruger, who finds just the right balance between Sultry and Saboteur.

"We ain't in the pris'ner takin' bidness, we in the killin' Nazi bidness."

Pitt again, and your guess is as good as mine.

Okay, you might have come to see Aldo the Apache butcher his was through Berlin but as the movie progresses you really start to get on board with Tarantino's vision of war. He shows us what a powerful weapon the media can be, and how propaganda can do more damage than even Donowitz's signed baseball bat. It's the art of film as a tool of war. It's when you consider this that you realise the calmer, less shooty film you are watching really starts to make sense.
You still, however, ask the question "What would a Tarantino action movie be like?"- to which the film responds "keep wondering.".

And, going back to an earlier point in my introduction, if this is a remake of World War II then it gets away with it because it actually doesn't take itself too seriously. It's funny in parts, even.
But, it is a decidedly "American" remake. A world in which even the humblest GI can kill Hitler and live the American Dream in a house made of Stars, Stripes and other strange building materials.
I'm sorry if you're American and are offended by that, but before you react please refer to the film Pearl Harbour, then I'll write you a prescription for 100mg of That'sfuckingwhyazine. Unlimited refills.

image

"We have all of our rotten eggs in one basket."

General Ed Fenech, as played my Mike Myers. Wasn't he a comedian once or something?

It's ironic then, that the part of this film I hate most is a Love Guru-starring Limey git.
If I may go off on a tangent for a moment: Wayne's World was hilarious. But Mike Myers doesn't seem to realise that he was in no way the cause of this. Austin Powers was funny for what it was, but he pissed all over that by stretching a sketches' worth of material over three agonising films, with a rumoured fourth in the works right now.
His screen time is kept mercifully brief.

Strangely for a Tarantino film the weakest part of the piece is the characterisation.
There isn't any.
With the exception of Landa there isn't really a character you can get to grips with. There's no Jules Winfield or Mr White here, just a collection of archetypes. Anyone pining for pointed, naturalistic conversation and settings are going to leave as disappointed as the people who wanted the bullets to punctuate the sentences like commas.
Although in fairness, you can't really talk about Madonna's Big Dick or Five Dollar Shakes when the film is set in 1944.

"He really went yardo on that one!"

Sergeant Donnie Donowitz, on his latest handiwork.

So, the verdict?
Not the film you expected, no matter what you want from it.
It's not his best, but it ranks just under Reservoir Dogs. For any other director this would be the greatest praise they could ever hope to achieve, but for QT himself it's the equivalent of a gold star.

The story is quirky and original. The script, while not as naturalistic as his other works is witty in places and the leads have a great air of charisma about them.
And that Monsieur, is what makes this a 'Tino.

___________________________________________________________________________________
Can't sleep? Me either.

[1] Don't go saying "you need to know the genre to get the film". A film shouldn't be so plagiarised that I need a crash course in Eastern cinema to understand it. "Paying homage" and "copying" are only a fine line apart, and in this case QT crossed it.

Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

That was a pleasure to read. Man, I gotta get me more of these. Nice work.

Very, very well done. I loved the movie and couldn't agree more on the stellar performance from Christoph Waltz

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Thanks for the kind words guys, I appreciate it.

Any requests? I'm out of ideas lol

domble:

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Thanks for the kind words guys, I appreciate it.

Any requests? I'm out of ideas lol

er....they're both me
perhaps you could review a place next?

Jedamethis:

domble:

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Jedamethis:
Yay for caffeine!
keep on making these, they're brilliant

Thanks for the kind words guys, I appreciate it.

Any requests? I'm out of ideas lol

er....they're both me
perhaps you could review a place next?

Yeah, for some reason i couldn't quote the other dude. weird eh?

lol a place? i'd review liverpool but the word "hell" won't fill a blog.

Your reviews are really good. I especially like the layout of them. Keep making more. :]

You can skip Death Proof. All the characters are assholes and the entire 1st half the movie is pointless.

Pretty good review mate. Only criticism I can make would be that you could have used a few more spoiler warnings for those who haven't seen it.

Woot, another caffeine review ;D. I agree in some instances, it's not tarantino's best; but, I did enjoy the film more than you did (seemingly).

domble:
Don't go saying "you need to know the genre to get the film". A film shouldn't be so plagiarised that I need a crash course in Eastern cinema to understand it. "Paying homage" and "copying" are only a fine line apart, and in this case QT crossed it.

It's funny that you mention it. When I first saw the Kill Bill trailers I thought it absolutely sucked. Until I did some research and "got" the genre. I then went to see both volumes and absolutely loved them.

deadman91:
Pretty good review mate. Only criticism I can make would be that you could have used a few more spoiler warnings for those who haven't seen it.

Aw fuck sorry mate, have you seen it yourself?

I did't think I gave anything away that wasn't already in the trailers, can you tell me which part/s it was that need censoring?

domble:

deadman91:
Pretty good review mate. Only criticism I can make would be that you could have used a few more spoiler warnings for those who haven't seen it.

Aw fuck sorry mate, have you seen it yourself?

I did't think I gave anything away that wasn't already in the trailers, can you tell me which part/s it was that need censoring?

Mostly in your character descriptions, when you talk about the opening scene with the Jew Hunter. You didn't give much away, but they were little things that are better when they aren't already known. I just suggest, to make life a little simpler, wrap the whole thing in a spoiler warning. If people then go and read it its their own fault so doesn't matter.

But it was a seriously good review, and i'm hoping you'll keep writing them.

deadman91:

domble:

deadman91:
Pretty good review mate. Only criticism I can make would be that you could have used a few more spoiler warnings for those who haven't seen it.

Aw fuck sorry mate, have you seen it yourself?

I did't think I gave anything away that wasn't already in the trailers, can you tell me which part/s it was that need censoring?

Mostly in your character descriptions, when you talk about the opening scene with the Jew Hunter. You didn't give much away, but they were little things that are better when they aren't already known. I just suggest, to make life a little simpler, wrap the whole thing in a spoiler warning. If people then go and read it its their own fault so doesn't matter.

But it was a seriously good review, and i'm hoping you'll keep writing them.

Tell ya what, I'll put "Minor Spoilers contained within- read at your own discretion" just under the title.

Thanks for the feedback dude, and there will be more. Really getting into my writing now :)

Any suggestions? Well, what do you want to review in the 1st place. A food, a game, a car, a movie, what?

Sven und EIN HUND:
Woot, another caffeine review ;D. I agree in some instances, it's not tarantino's best; but, I did enjoy the film more than you did (seemingly).

Nah I did enjoy it, but I can just feel that he's got another Pulp Fiction in him but in this he didn't quite achieve that kind of standard.

Still well worth a watch though.

domble:

Nah I did enjoy it, but I can just feel that he's got another Pulp Fiction in him but in this he didn't quite achieve that kind of standard.

Still well worth a watch though.

Agreed and agreed. It lacked the masterpiece his earlier films had that just made you go, "Fuck me, that was excellent, bravo." I too still really liked it though.

If im right, why are almost all of your reveiws caffine endused, is it something with you or am i thinking of a different person.

anyway, good reveiw.

Supreme Unleaded:
If im right, why are almost all of your reveiws caffine endused, is it something with you or am i thinking of a different person.

anyway, good reveiw.

it is me yeah, i just wanted a name for the reviews i write and caffeine seemed as good as any.

it's mainly because i just don't sleep lol

Nice review man. And I've gotta say I like your use of quotes in the formatting, that gives it a nice touch.

domble:
Strangely for a Tarantino film the weakest part of the piece is the characterisation.
There isn't any.
With the exception of Landa there isn't really a character you can get to grips with. There's no Jules Winfield or Mr White here, just a collection of archetypes.

Really? What was your opinion on the character of Shosanna? I thought she was fairly well developed, and more than just an archetype.

Pseudonym2:
You can skip Death Proof. All the characters are assholes and the entire 1st half the movie is pointless.

Yeah but I LOVE kurt russel.

In everything but escape from LA. No one liked that film lol

Pseudonym2:
You can skip Death Proof. All the characters are assholes and the entire 1st half the movie is pointless.

That was pretty much the whole point of the film, but the ending's pretty worthwhile in my opinion purely for Russel's performance.

 
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with The Escapist, Register With Facebook
or
Registered for a free account here
Forum Jump: