$2.50 Reviews: Scre4m (2011)

Previous Review: Scream 3

Next Review: Braindead


$2.50 Reviews

Scre4m

image

Scre4m, which is a more cleverly presented title than you might initially think, is a return to form for the Scream series, managing to find the near-perfect balance between horror, comedy and satire that the first in the series established, and the other two films attempted but couldn't quite get right. It's the best in the franchise since the first, and if this is the new direction that it's going, I'm all for it. I thought I was done with Scream after the third one, but after seeing this, I'm a fan again.

image

This time around, the target of the parody is two-fold. On one hand, we have horror franchise reboots -- something that Scre4m is attempting to be, which leads to some humorous moments -- and on the other, we have self-aware horror films, which is something that the Scream series has always been about. The smart dialogue has returned, and with it the laughs that were brought about in the first film. Unlike what happened in Scream 3, where the humor seemed forced, it all feels natural here and is much more enjoyable as a result.

Scre4m begins with more than one opening kill sequence, which is already switching things up. There was finally a comment on the unrelated opening kill as well, something I was waiting for since the first film. There are a couple of fairly high-profile cameos in these kills, too, two of which I certainly enjoyed. Long story short: Ghostface is back, 15 years after he originally started causing trouble in the small town of Woodsboro. Coincidentally, star of the first few films, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) is back in town as well, making it the first stop on her new book tour.

So, Ghostface starts wreaking havoc, the two other characters who survived the first three films, now-Sherrif Dewey (David Arquette) and now-married-to-Dewey-and-no-longer-a-reporter Gale (Courteney Cox) meet up with Sidney, and it's time to get scared. Again. These people really can't catch a break. Unfortunately, this time, the supporting cast is made up of Jill (Emma Roberts), Sidney's cousin, and Jill's friends.

image

Most of the film has the adults trying to figure out what's going on, while the teenagers continue on with their lives while being picked off one by one. Everyone makes references to horror movies and tropes in these horror movies, and pretty much everyone is a suspect -- even the people who appear in the same scene as Ghostface. This might be the most straightforward killer reveal in the franchise, but I'll admit that it still managed to fool me. And there's actually a lot that happens after the reveal, too, with about fifteen more minutes of film after we find out who is killing everyone in sight.

Onto the title, which I'll defend after having seen the film. See, Scre4m wants to have it both ways, functioning both as a sequel to the previous three films and a reboot of the franchise. Keeping the "4" in the title, replacing the "a" allows you to take it both ways. I laughed at the title when I first saw it, but after watching the movie, I no longer have a problem with it. It was chosen very deliberately and with purpose, and I'm okay with it.

Scre4m really is the best movie since the first, in large part because it's genuinely thrilling, but also very funny. The self-awareness continues and is very prominent, but that and the other obvious parody never gets in the way of the fun. It is pretty much a perfect balance between the three, and I had a blast with Scre4m as a result. It's pretty much the follow-up that I wanted after the first, and I'm happy it's here even though fans had to wait 15 years to get it.

image

There are a few new things in Scre4m, all of which I'm happy to see. Ghostface, the killer who primarily uses a knife to stab his victims to death, actually uses a gun at one point. It's nice to see that changed up a bit. I also didn't mind the running time. The previous three Scream films all felt overlong -- yes, even the first one, which is still the best in the series -- but Scre4m felt like the perfect length. And there are also a few quiet character moments scattered throughout, which is always a nice touch, allowing for some character development in the process.

At this point in their careers, you shouldn't expect the returning cast members to turn in poor performances. You might expect them to be awkward, jumping back into characters they haven't played in a decade, but rest assured that it's a seamless transition. They're professionals, after all, and they're just fine. I was impressed with some of the more youthful actors as well, even though none of them are necessarily big stars yet.

Scre4m is a very enjoyable film, and the best Scream film since the first. It surpasses the second due to its near-perfect balance between humor and horror, while throwing in a nice dose of satire for good measure. It's genuinely frightening, oftentimes very funny, and always enjoyable. It didn't feel too long, it made the main villain slightly more interesting, and it even paused for breathers and character depth. It's a very enjoyable slasher film, and if it's the start of more Scream movies, I'd be completely fine with that.

_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go here.

I'll take note, and I think I'll watch this, though I think I should rewatch at least the first one since I haven't seen it in a looong time and can barely remember it.

A fourth movie of a tired franchise that's actually GOOD?

Something went horribly wrong somewhere.

Would it be too much to ask who those cameos are at the start of the movie?

Captcha: little did he know. Goddamn it captcha, stop being creepy as hell. Seriously, someone put Wheatly in charge of the captcha puzzles.

cojo965:
Would it be too much to ask who those cameos are at the start of the movie?

The most prominent would be Anna Paquin and Kristen Bell, who share an awesome scene together. They're the only two I can remember, to be honest.

Marter:

cojo965:
Would it be too much to ask who those cameos are at the start of the movie?

The most prominent would be Anna Paquin and Kristen Bell, who share an awesome scene together. They're the only two I can remember, to be honest.

That's the True Blood chick right? And by the way I'm suprised you didn't have an entry for taking a level in badass over in the thread I made for that. Wait. Oh right, the movie, isn't Lucy Hale in this?

cojo965:
That's the True Blood chick right? And by the way I'm suprised you didn't have an entry for taking a level in badass over in the thread I made for that. Wait. Oh right, the movie, isn't Lucy Hale in this?

Paquin's in True Blood, yes. She was also Rogue in the first three live action X-Men films.

I didn't post in your thread because I couldn't be bothered, really. And because I don't post in the majority of threads that get made.

Lucy Hale is in it, I believe. One of the opening scenes, if memory serves (which it usually doesn't).

Marter:

cojo965:
That's the True Blood chick right? And by the way I'm suprised you didn't have an entry for taking a level in badass over in the thread I made for that. Wait. Oh right, the movie, isn't Lucy Hale in this?

Paquin's in True Blood, yes. She was also Rogue in the first three live action X-Men films.

I didn't post in your thread because I couldn't be bothered, really. And because I don't post in the majority of threads that get made.

Lucy Hale is in it, I believe. One of the opening scenes, if memory serves (which it usually doesn't).

Ya know, you didn't actually need to respond to that bit about the thread. I asked about Lucy Hale because I have something of a crush on her, don't judge me.

cojo965:
Ya know, you didn't actually need to respond to that bit about the thread. I asked about Lucy Hale because I have something of a crush on her, don't judge me.

Well, you keep asking why I didn't reply to Thread A, so that's my reason. ;P

And I wouldn't judge for something like that! She's cute.

Marter:

cojo965:
Ya know, you didn't actually need to respond to that bit about the thread. I asked about Lucy Hale because I have something of a crush on her, don't judge me.

Well, you keep asking why I didn't reply to Thread A, so that's my reason. ;P

And I wouldn't judge for something like that! She's cute.

Fair enough, but god Braindead's next? I saw a brief clip from it and couldn't finish it because the gore in that clip alone made me really uncomfortable, and mind you this is coming from someone who loves Repo!.

 

Reply to Thread

This thread is locked