$2.50 Reviews: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)

Previous Review: Raiders of the Lost Ark


$2.50 Reviews

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom

image

Remember how lighthearted and fun Raiders of the Lost Ark was? Even when lives were on the line, everyone was still smiling, knowing that their skill and perhaps a little bit of luck would allow them to escape relatively unharmed. The bad guys would get shot up a touch, the good guys would be mostly okay, and everyone would be able to go about their merry way. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is not like this. It has the humor but none of the charm, and it has a few scenes that are darker than anything you'll find in Raiders.

image

This is a prequel to the film that introduced us to Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford), the professor and archaeologist who so competently provided us two hours of thrills, all while keeping a smile on his face. This movie takes place only a couple of years prior to Raiders, and in the opening sequence, we see that Indiana is still the dashing fellow he becomes slightly later in life. He manages to escape from some Chinese businessmen, negate the poison that he ingested while dealing with them, and save two other people from a plane that was about to crash. And that's just for starters.

The people with him are the love interest, a singer name Willie (Kate Capshaw), and a small child suitably named Short Round (Jonathan Ke Quan), an orphan that Indy takes with him on his adventures. After escaping from the plane, the trio finds themselves in India, at a small village that claims a magical stone was stolen, and that its theft has caused them to starve. Crops are dying, the well dried up, and so on. Indy, reluctantly, at first, decides that getting the stone back would be a good idea.

So, we're on another adventure. Unlike the last film, which took place in a great many locations, this one focuses on a palace, which holds unspeakable secrets. Once inside, there are a great many dangers for Indy and crew to face, and it's here where most of the excitement comes in. There are some seriously dark moments in Temple of Doom, and I was surprised by some of the places that it went to.

image

I can see what the filmmakers were trying to do. The first film had Nazis as the villain, and in order to not use them again, the film is set a bit earlier, before Jones had any reason to deal with them. The first movie was lighter in tone, so in order to contrast that, this one had to be darker. It helps keep things fresh, which I was happy with, although it lost some of the charm when that tonal change was made. How can something be charming when inside it you see a heart being ripped from someone's chest -- and then the person whose heart is no longer attached to the body gets burned alive?

Okay, so that's as dark as it gets, but in comparison to the first film, that's pretty bad. I didn't mind this direction, in large part because it allows the film to go in different ways -- and because the humor was kept, ensuring that I still laughed even when the darkness came -- but I can see it turning away some people who just wanted a light, enjoyable action-adventure movie. This is not that.

There is less action this time around, although once it starts, it takes a while to dial back down. Some of the film actually -- and if you saw the first film, you might not believe this -- talking and sitting around a table. And spying. Spying! Can you imagine that? Instead of recklessly charging into action, Indy and the gang wait until people have left in order to steal the magical stone. And they actually directly impact the ending this time around, which is always a plus.

image

The ending is what I disliked about Raiders. This time, my complaint is with the cast. Kate Capshaw's Willie is not as strong of a character as Karen Allen's Marion. Willie is more of an annoyance, rarely helping and always shrieking. Short Round, while a cut kid, also doesn't help all that much. Ke quan and Ford do have a strong chemistry, though, and if they didn't get separated so often, that could have really been made into something. Caphsaw and Ford's relationship, on the other hand, feels weak, especially when compared to the one in the previous film.

Temple of Doom is still quite inventive, and I enjoyed the few action scenes that we did get. The stakes feel high, although the characters are still occasionally joking, and they're always exciting. The opening is possibly even better than the one in the first movie, and the scene with bugs and spikes is so well-done that I found myself genuinely worried about Indy and his kid sidekick. It's a thrilling actioner, even if it is a bit darker and contains a bit less action than its predecessor.

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is a darker Indiana Jones film than the one that preceded it, but it's still a lot of fun and contains some very exciting moments. What didn't work as well was the love interest -- in part because the character is written to be weaker than Marion, and also because Capshaw's chemistry with Ford wasn't as strong -- and the kid sidekick -- which didn't work because it wasn't given a whole lot of time to develop. But if you're up for a slightly darker movie still starring the capable man with a whip and fedora, this is one you'll want to watch.

_________________________________________________________________________________

If you are a fan of my reviews, and want to boost my ego receive notifications when new reviews are posted, please join/visit this user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go here.

Kate Capshaw's Willie is not as strong of a character as Karen Allen's Marion. Willie is more of an annoyance,rarely helping and always shrieking.

THIS is exactly why I'm not too fond of this film or Last Crusade. Though Last Crusade has A LOT more redeeming factors for having to deal with an annoying female character.

Though I do like the heart ripping out and Willie's reaction to some of the food they get served....That did make me giggle.

Blow_Pop:

Kate Capshaw's Willie is not as strong of a character as Karen Allen's Marion. Willie is more of an annoyance,rarely helping and always shrieking.

THIS is exactly why I'm not too fond of this film or Last Crusade. Though Last Crusade has A LOT more redeeming factors for having to deal with an annoying female character.

Couldn't agree more with both of you. I thought a lot of the action terrific, but man, was she annoying. I think it was Speilberg that ended up marrying her. No accounting for taste!

ITMT: I appreciate these guys take on IJ (edit, though, you might want to skip the first minute... oy... but the subejct becomes awesome!

This movie is really awful, I just watched all three Indiana Jones movies a few days ago and compared to Raiders and Crusade this one just doesn't measure up. I could barely stand to watch it after the first 30 minutes.

Raiders on the other hand is an absolute masterpiece, and Crusade is very good also.

So few years ago I watched all 3 movies for the first time, because somehow I missed out on them whenever they were on TV. Raiders was obviously awesome, but Temple of Doom?....first I almost fell asleeep, then it gave me a headache....yeah...I rather watch Crystal Skull, at least that one only made me fall asleep, but no headache. Now Crusade was a breath of fresh air.
Also nice review.

The worst thing about Temple of Doom is that it isn't 100% about its own tone. After the pretty straight up Raiders-esque opener with its Busby Berkely song and dance routine and its nudge-nudge, how 'bout dem Star Wars films sight gag and writer-director cameos, we find ourselves in Pankot palace and suddenly Temple is lurching from serious to comedic like a drunk with two different tables full of free booze.

At one end of the table, there's Indy in Doctor Jones mode, urbanely discussing the British Empire and the legacy of the Raj with the Prime Minister and down the other end, there's the gurning Indian caricatures mugging over "chilled monkey brains!" and some terrible clowning from Willie and Short Round. Things don't improve after dinner, as the painful scene between Capshaw and Ford which sees the film drift in dialogue territory that would be more familiar if this were Carry On...Up The Khyber. Somehow, Willie has gone from hating Jones to wanting to exchange terrible double entendres with him in a matter of hours. Even as Indy and Shortie find a secret passage and get down to some good old dungeon-crawling a la Raiders first act, we're awkwardly whip-lashing back and forth between drama and comedy. I'm not entirely sure whether we're supposed to be afraid or laugh at the face Harrison Ford pulls as he utters the line "We are going to DIE!"

The 'darkness' in this film gets a lot of mention, but you know, it's not actually any more dark than Raiders, really. Sure, someone gets their heart pulled out before being dumped into a pool of lava. But, hey, in Raiders a man gets set on fire and shot in the head, the Gestapo threaten Karen Allen with a red hot poker and a lascivious, implying grin Herr Flick would be proud of, someone else gets shredded by a propeller and two people's faces melt while another explodes into a pillar of fire. Granted, most of these unfortunate souls are Nazis, so its all good. Templeseems to dwell on its unpleasantness though, almost reveling in those scenes when bad things happen to innocent people. It just...doesn't seem to know what to do with itself, and consequently it suffers from a terrible case of mood whiplash as it moves from trying to terrify and appall you to trying to make you snigger. Often at the same time.

 

Reply to Thread

This thread is locked