Playing It Properly

 Pages PREV 1 2
 

I played Halo with my girlfriend the other day... Poor thing, I had forgotten how damn hard it is to get used to moving with the left stick and looking with the right. Poor girl, I got quite short with her. I'm such a turd.

I used to be like this, but after 30 years of playing games I just leave people to it and only help if they ask. Being ancient (by the standards of the avid consumer) most people I know don't play games. Therefore I'm please when they give it a go and don't want to put them off.

I am going to send this article to a friend of mine who reloaded Mass Effect 2 until he got the whole team to survive. He missed out on 'that' Shepard's story in my opinion because he wanted a 'paragon' game. My paragon Shep lost Legion, if you've played Mass Effect 3, you'll know the impact that will have, awesome and dramatic for a goody two-shoes.

Good article. I think I've improved at this sort of behaviour.

SpaceBat:

SpiderJerusalem:
I know what you're doing wrong.

You're wasting your time with Heavy Rain, arguably one of the most poorly written excuses for David Cage masturbation since Fahrenheit. It's hard to call it a game as much a reflex test, and if it would be a film that it so much desires to be, it would have been laughed to the ground alongside Battlefield Earth.

From now on I'm asking you what I should buy/play, because subjective experiences can no longer exist in gaming.

There's nothing subjective about calling the writing in Heavy Rain bad. Anyone with a single iota of common sense when it comes to writing fiction can tell you that the game/reflex test was nothing but a z-grade soap opera filled with poor characterization, plot holes and nonsense.

Ed Smith:
Playing It Properly

If you're experienced with videogames, you're probably playing them wrong.

Read Full Article

Love it! As gamers, we're definitely losing our sense of play. Of course, we're not the only hobby this happens to (we've all had that friend that takes X, Y, or Z hobby too seriously), but it's a symptom of the larger problem: we're forgetting how to have pointless fun, and that's a major loss.

This was an enjoyable read, and really spoke to me since I'm such a damn perfectionist with these things.

Wait, you're saying she was impressed by Heavy Rain's writing?

Anyway, reminds me of when I was little and I used to watch my Dad play stuff. I used to blast through and he used to agonisingly inspect everything.

Irridium:
Though he does have his limits. He never even bothered to get the flags/feathers in the Assassin's Creed games.

I got the feathers. And that was the last time I bothered collecting anything.

Thief used to do it right though, since getting the loot fed so directly back into the game itself.

Oh, and I must ask: was this...

And that's fine; I respect developers who trust their work enough to not let players interfere with it too much.

... meant to be ironic? I mean, that's certainly an interesting conclusion to come to when you're talking about games.

SpiderJerusalem:

There's nothing subjective about calling the writing in Heavy Rain bad. Anyone with a single iota of common sense when it comes to writing fiction can tell you that the game/reflex test was nothing but a z-grade soap opera filled with poor characterization, plot holes and nonsense.

Oh my...
I didn't think you'd miss the point of my post (and the entire topic as well, apparently) this badly, although now that I think about it, I really should have seen it coming.

SpaceBat:

SpiderJerusalem:

There's nothing subjective about calling the writing in Heavy Rain bad. Anyone with a single iota of common sense when it comes to writing fiction can tell you that the game/reflex test was nothing but a z-grade soap opera filled with poor characterization, plot holes and nonsense.

Oh my...
I didn't think you'd miss the point of my post (and the entire topic as well, apparently) this badly, although now that I think about it, I really should have seen it coming.

You are aware of the concept of going off tangent and discussing other matters related to the main topic, while not strictly being on topic at all?

:edit: Catchpa: Many Wishes. Hah. Fat chance of any of them coming true.

Oh but there IS a correct way to play a game. Some games are just more brutal in the consequences of failure.

If you don't press the right buttons at the right time in RE4 QTEs, you die. If you don't use certain items to unlock things like doors, you don't progress. If you aren't headed in the right direction, you won't reach the next area.

High scores and good endings is one thing, but if you simply cannot progress beyond a certain point, then you probably don't know what to do and are doing the wrong thing, hence the clear lack of progress.

Games still require us to jump through hoops to attain certain goals.

Giving the player too much freedom means risking that they'll use it in fruitless ways in the context of the game. You CAN play GTA IV like it's a huge sandbox with lots of NPCs for you to kill and loot, or a glorified driving simulator. If, hypothetically, that would be the only way you'd play it...then the story (missions) is wasted on you. And, truly, that is where the game shines. It is its core.

Dicking around can be fun for a while, but progress and achievement is what drives gamers to finish a game.

While I'm good at not giving shits about achievements and trophies, it's the scoring systems that kill me. Fucking LA Noire and their pointless score that makes obsessive gold medal-ers like myself screw up the game for themselves by constantly reloading the last save. I would have enjoyed that game so much more if that wasn't there.

That struck me deep. I've been an obsessive freak when it comes to 100%ing video games for as long as I can remember.

I think it's pretty hard to play a video game wrong, though. If you're having fun while playing a game, you're doing it right.

Lex Darko:
Another thing you could do is instead of just telling your girlfriend what to do, ask leading questions. Like for example with FBI crime scene ask: maybe the victim's body has clues you might want to examine it before leaving; or this area is really muddy, how could anyone walk down here without leaving behind foot prints.

Personally, I would find that more annoying than someone trying to take the controller off me (where I could at least tell them to kindly f**k off without seeming like I was overreacting).

My boyfriend is a real RPG fan, whereas I'm completely rubbish at them. But even when watching over my shoulder (which he doesn't do very often because he knows it annoys me), he has never tried to prod me in the "right direction". And while this has led to me having to restart Dragon Age: Origins from the beginning (having mucked up my first game after about six hours) I appreciate him leaving me to learn rather than trying to "coach".

After all, he learnt to play RPGs without someone telling him what to do.

I'm feeling exactly like this with Dishonored. All the warnings about rising chaos levels and dark endings has killed my ability to own my experience. I choose not to use my badass murder powers not for fun or out of empathy, but because of my slavish commitment to the "good" ending. If developers insist on informing our play styles like this, I wish they'd do so more surreptitiously.

Mr Companion:

And never EVER take the controller out of their hands even if they tell you to.

I remember they said almost the exact same thing in an Extra Credits episode.

OT: I used to be like this when playing Tekken. When my brother and I played against each other, we agreed to never use throws on each other. Needless to say when we started playing in the arcade, we would call people who threw us "cheaters."

A few years and watching a few tournaments later, we've matured past this now.

Hevva:
He wasn't thinking about "good" or "bad" endings - he was just thinking about how neat it was that he could shoot someone mid-sentence if they annoyed him too much - while I'm sitting there itching to jump up and say, "But no! If you do X, Y won't happen! Think, man!" He was the one playing properly, I was the one being the asshole.

But people are rather conditioning by movies, shows, books and also games on how things should end. 99% of the movies don't have a bad ending and when they do we feel aggravated because we spent all that effort and it didn't work out. Of course, that's part of life in a nutshell but we've grown to dislike that possibly because we already deal with that on a daily basis and we want to escape.

So I'm actually surprised the girlfriend or your brother didn't feel bad when they got bad endings or playthroughs since at some point they should feel "Oh this isn't going well for me" and either quit or try again to make it better.

That's what drives us more than the "high score" system and this article neglects to truly mention it when speaking of a right way to play: We genuinely prefer a good ending over a bad one to be the definitive one and we'll only see a bad one for completionism's sake, not because we think it's canon.

 Pages PREV 1 2

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below:
With Facebook:Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with The Escapist:
Register With Facebook
Register With Facebook
or
Register for a free account here