OH Tank! Tank! Tank! we expected so much of you: repetitiveness, unimaginitiveness, and simplicity (and all of that from the title). at least you didn't disappoint those expectations,

but at 50USD. Just Why?

If it's not worth a buy at all, why is it a two out of five?

Are the escapist secretly running a three star scoring system?

Guys, let's make this the only thread about Tank! Tank! Tank! in the world that doesn't have a *word*! *word*! *word*! joke every other post.

fix-the-spade:
If it's not worth a buy at all, why is it a two out of five?

Are the escapist secretly running a three star scoring system?

I believe 1 star is only for broken, unplayable games, or offensively bad games. This game is functional, but just shallow and repetitive.

When I saw the news at first I thought it was a game for iOS and Android o.o Wii U, haven't you learned???

Shouldn't broken/unplayable be 0 stars?

well, this game will surely tank. tank. tank.

RejjeN:
Shouldn't broken/unplayable be 0 stars?

I would imagine 1 would be for games that aren't broken, but have no redeeming features. They did find a FEW good things in Tank! Tank! Tank!

BattleTanx, Treadmarks, Armored Fist, any of these ring a bell? They are ten years older than this game and manage to be generation ahead in terms of fun! Hell, pop Battlefield 1942: Desert Combat in for some even greater fun.

Full price for a port of a 3 year old game

And the games industry wonders why so may people buy second hand instead of new