He TACKLES!PHA+PGltZyBzcmM9Imh0dHA6Ly80LmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS9fRzZXRnhYQUlic1kvVEpGYk1pbDJYYUkvQUFBQUFBQUFBbmMvZ3lCN0t6R2hWM00vczE2MDAvQ2FsdmluLWFuZC1Ib2JiZXMtZG9vci5qcGciIGFsdD0iaW1hZ2UiLz48YnIgLz5GYXIgbW9yZSBkZXN0cnVjdGl2ZTwvcD4=
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
...then again, that's kind of what Crit Miss has been doing ever since Erin's hallucinations started. hmm...
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! DON'T DO THIS! THIS IS NOT NEEDED! Look at what Krantos said. He's right. Although I don't mind Erin's video-game hallucinations, I do greatly mind watching my old innocent friend Hobbes turn into the worst stereotype of an XBox Live player.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
Agreed wholeheartedly.
This smacks of laziness. The same kind of inane garbage that Waterson has spoken against in regards why he never licensed Calvin and Hobbes anywhere. This, if anything, is validation of his point.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
...then again, that's kind of what Crit Miss has been doing ever since Erin's hallucinations started. hmm...
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
Agreed wholeheartedly.
This smacks of laziness. The same kind of inane garbage that Waterson has spoken against in regards why he never licensed Calvin and Hobbes anywhere. This, if anything, is validation of his point.
Man, nothing brings out the condescension of others more than a slightly unoriginal comic strip, huh? :D
It isn't simply, "Look how funny it is when Hobbs uses naughty language." It's more, "Call of Duty on X-Box live would corrupt even Hobbs."
Anyway, I was surprised to see that Calvin and Hobbs has a borderline religious following.
I guess I need to read Garfield Minus Garfield with new eyes now, and consider that there might be huge fans of Garfield offended to outrage by the corruption of the strip.
Calvin not having an xbox does not surprise me. His father was staunchly against getting cable remember?
Hobbes becoming affected by Xbox live is cute, but wonder if these guys ever come up with a concept and totally think "we're going to burn for this one" in one sense or another.
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
this is nothing like that. It's Hobbes through the filter of Erin's screwed up head. This isn't a Calvin and Hobbes reboot. In fact, when we saw Kratos with Calvin, he was enjoying riding down a hill on a sled with a little boy. Neither the sled nor the boy were being horribly maimed in a quicktime event.
Well, if Twitter is to be believed, he got the BlOps 2 rage comments from resident spud Miracle of Sound, so for whatever it means, you gotta ask him.
I'll take a wild guess here though and guess it means something along the lines of noob tube ('scrub' from what I can recall meaning from my little brother's screaming, is someone who isn't good at the game, or at least something along those lines).
See this is the problem I always have with people "Revisiting" classic cartoons. They always feel they have to make it darker. Like having Charlie Brown kill Lucy for pulling the ball away. Or Calvin's parents putting him on anti-psychotics.
The old strips' innocence is what made them good. Well, C&H was also good because of the way Calvin and Hobbes would tackle existential questions, but that's another story.
People using the characters like this is just stupid. It's basically saying "hurr, hurr, Hobbes is Swearing!"
The only time I've seen classic characters used well were those Bacon and Hobbes strips.
These Erin and Hobbes strips come across as the writers just saying "Hey LOOK! We're Using characters from another cartoon! Like Us because you like them! Do you like us yet?"
...then again, that's kind of what Crit Miss has been doing ever since Erin's hallucinations started. hmm...
Weve got another in the works that may change your mind, its going to be a mini arc.
I feel the same way with Watterson's work, those fucking window decals of "BADASS" calvin taking a piss have always rubbed me the wrong way. When Grey pitched the idea I was very skeptical and immediately refused, but then we talked over what we could do with the concept and we came up with a pretty good idea. So I hopped on board.
Weve got another in the works that may change your mind, its going to be a mini arc.
I feel the same way with Watterson's work, those fucking window decals of "BADASS" calvin taking a piss have always rubbed me the wrong way. When Grey pitched the idea I was very skeptical and immediately refused, but then we talked over what we could do with the concept and we came up with a pretty good idea. So I hopped on board.
Erin and Hobbes #2
The Beast
Read Full Article