Topic Index
New Tech Could Make All PS3s Backwards Compatible

Username:Password:
Log In
 (Pages: 1, 2, 3)
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2010
Joined: 11 Jan 2009

How do we know Sony will actually make this a free download for everyone? They could just continue too sell PS2 consoles and not release this until they stop making a decent killing on PS2 sales.

Copy Clerk
Posts: 100
Joined: 11 Jun 2009

I would by a brand new ps3 if they do this I am looking to buy a refurbished 60 or 80gig right now this would save me money and it would be brand new.

Muckraker
Posts: 348
Joined: 6 Feb 2008

first off, the rrod will NEVER be fixed because the rrod is indicative of an internal hardware failure, and as long as there are 360s there will be rrod's. however the cause of the abnormally high failure rate HAS been fixed with jasper and better heatsink designs, so occurances of it should be down to normal levels of failure (electronics fail sometimes, it happens).

anyway, i have to ask what the point of this article is? this "new tech" isnt new. a software ps2 emulator has been possible on the ps3 from day one, sony has the resources to make one in a few months and given that any team they assign to the project will have full access to design and hardware/software specifications for both the ps2 and ps3 it wouldnt be as hard as the pcsx2 team has had. only thing is sony hasant put ANY effort into it because, and i quote, "people arent interested in backwards compatibility". until ps2 sales tank and it becomes viable they probably wont.

anyway, i think this article is kinda fudge, its always been possible, sony just hasant done it.

Anonymous Source
Posts: 7
Joined: 9 May 2009

...Except even the hackers have had a royal bitch of time trying to emulate the PS2 on windows software, so getting the emulation right, is not something that can be pulled of in a month of work. Particularly if there's something as quixotic as the emotion engine chip involved.

Izerous:
Even the proposed emulation for this patent would be weaker then what the 60GB was released with.

Care then to tell the unwashed masses why this is?

Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 609
Joined: 26 Apr 2009

My ps3 has bc. It would be nice for all ps3 owners to be able to play ps2 games on their ps3.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

Well crap. I just bought a brand new Slim a few weeks ago as I broke my launch one. Now I don't need it anymore?

Although a digital distribution thing would be really cool, for some of the hard-to-find titles. I can't find Ico anywhere, or Katamari Damacy, Twisted Metal Black - you get my point.

The Mess:

Izerous:
Even the proposed emulation for this patent would be weaker then what the 60GB was released with.

Care then to tell the unwashed masses why this is?

Same reason a high end PC runs NES games worse than the actual NES.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1198
Joined: 7 May 2009

Utarefson:

Psychosocial:

But then again, RROD isn't fully fixed, so they're not the slowest.

It is already fixed.

All I have to say to that is: HA!

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1521
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

Indigo_Dingo:
Well crap. I just bought a brand new Slim a few weeks ago as I broke my launch one. Now I don't need it anymore?

Although a digital distribution thing would be really cool, for some of the hard-to-find titles. I can't find Ico anywhere, or Katamari Damacy, Twisted Metal Black - you get my point.

The Mess:

Izerous:
Even the proposed emulation for this patent would be weaker then what the 60GB was released with.

Care then to tell the unwashed masses why this is?

Same reason a high end PC runs NES games worse than the actual NES.

But funnily enough, there are games on the PS2 that run worse on the original hardware than emulated on the PC (though admittedly those are the exception, not the rule). Also, SOTC ran better on the PS3 emulated than on the original hardware, apparently.

That and there are old games that benefit from emulation quite a bit. You don't have to wait for those 15 minute load breaks while trying to get that C64 game to run.

GloatingSwine:

Saved something like $20 per system built. At a time when they were taking an utter hosing on build costs.

The chip costed that much per system but I still don't see why they also discontinued emulation that was proven to be somewhat functional (but no good for fighting games for instance, trying to play GGXXAC with a 3 frame delay is pretty painful for instance). That move was the more puzzling one to be honest.

Muckraker
Posts: 348
Joined: 6 Feb 2008

The Mess:
...Except even the hackers have had a royal bitch of time trying to emulate the PS2 on windows software, so getting the emulation right, is not something that can be pulled of in a month of work. Particularly if there's something as quixotic as the emotion engine chip involved.

first off, i never said it could be done in only a month. a month is unlikely, several months on the other hand is perfectly feasiable, espically for a company with sonys resources.

second, it is fallacious to say what sony can or cant do because of what the pcsx2 team is doing. the pcsx2 team is made up of programmers who make the emulator in their SPARE TIME, while sony would have people working 8-10 hour days, 5 days a week on an emulator. also, the pcsx2 team doesent have access to all of the information that sonys programmers would have access to either.

On the Record
Posts: 5145
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Doesn't need to. Everything that's had the Playstation name plays Ps1 games, thats why the classics section works.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4921
Joined: 10 Jan 2009

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Same deal here: and I believe that all the PS3 models have PS1 capablity, which makes it even more nonsensical that they would choose to omit PS2 backwards compatability at all.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

scotth266:

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Same deal here: and I believe that all the PS3 models have PS1 capablity, which makes it even more nonsensical that they would choose to omit PS2 backwards compatability at all.

Because its much harder and more expensive to include than Ps1 backwards compatability.

On the Record
Posts: 5145
Joined: 3 Mar 2008

Indigo_Dingo:

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Doesn't need to. Everything that's had the Playstation name plays Ps1 games, thats why the classics section works.

scotth266:

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Same deal here: and I believe that all the PS3 models have PS1 capablity, which makes it even more nonsensical that they would choose to omit PS2 backwards compatability at all.

They can?

Well, I learned something new. I suppose there's one more thing to for me to save for now.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4921
Joined: 10 Jan 2009

Indigo_Dingo:

scotth266:

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Same deal here: and I believe that all the PS3 models have PS1 capablity, which makes it even more nonsensical that they would choose to omit PS2 backwards compatability at all.

Because its much harder and more expensive to include than Ps1 backwards compatability.

Which means there's no chance in hell that Sony's next system will be backwards compatabile then.

But seriously, the move to cut PS2 BC was ridiculous. If anything, they should have cut the PS1 capability. When you're moving people over from one console to another, and you know you have a substantial fanbase to work with, you don't decide to cut the BC for the previous console. Pulling a move like that is silly.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

scotth266:

Indigo_Dingo:

scotth266:

Lord Krunk:
Hey, I might have a reason to buy it now. Lack of backwards compatibility was why I switched to the 360 at the counter, you see.

But now for the clincher: Does it play PS1 games?

Same deal here: and I believe that all the PS3 models have PS1 capablity, which makes it even more nonsensical that they would choose to omit PS2 backwards compatability at all.

Because its much harder and more expensive to include than Ps1 backwards compatability.

Which means there's no chance in hell that Sony's next system will be backwards compatabile then.

But seriously, the move to cut PS2 BC was ridiculous. If anything, they should have cut the PS1 capability. When you're moving people over from one console to another, and you know you have a substantial fanbase to work with, you don't decide to cut the BC for the previous console. Pulling a move like that is silly.

If they have a next system - I still think Onlive will be the next step.

Ps1 BC costs them a tiny amount to put in. Ps2 backwards compatability requires that they put an actual Ps2 in the Ps3. This is the first form of Backwards Compatability with the Ps2 anyone has been exploring that doesn't effectively involve a Ps2 and a roll of duct tape.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4921
Joined: 10 Jan 2009

Indigo_Dingo:

If they have a next system - I still think Onlive will be the next step.

Ps1 BC costs them a tiny amount to put in. Ps2 backwards compatability requires that they put an actual Ps2 in the Ps3. This is the first form of Backwards Compatability with the Ps2 anyone has been exploring that doesn't effectively involve a Ps2 and a roll of duct tape.

Onlive? What on Earth is that? I seem to recall it being something I was skeptical about...

As far as this form of emulation goes, they're a little late to the party. After all, the 360 does BC via an emulator... so I'm kind of confused as to why Sony didn't see that and learn from it, especially when they heard all the complaints about the lack of BC.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

scotth266:

Indigo_Dingo:

If they have a next system - I still think Onlive will be the next step.

Ps1 BC costs them a tiny amount to put in. Ps2 backwards compatability requires that they put an actual Ps2 in the Ps3. This is the first form of Backwards Compatability with the Ps2 anyone has been exploring that doesn't effectively involve a Ps2 and a roll of duct tape.

Onlive? What on Earth is that? I seem to recall it being something I was skeptical about...

As far as this form of emulation goes, they're a little late to the party. After all, the 360 does BC via an emulator... so I'm kind of confused as to why Sony didn't see that and learn from it, especially when they heard all the complaints about the lack of BC.

Because the difference between the Ps2 and the Ps3 is a bit bigger than between the Xbox and the Xbox 360. Thats sorta like asking modern Chinese people to explain the origins of the Baigong pipes, based on the fact that Americans know where the Liberty Bell came from.

Paperboy
Posts: 37
Joined: 29 May 2009

This doesn't offer anything that the older 80GB PS3 didn't already have, software emulation. This isn't a sign of things to come, just a patent for something they've already done.

P.S. Thanks

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

Covarr:
This doesn't offer anything that the older 80GB PS3 didn't already have, software emulation. This isn't a sign of things to come, just a patent for something they've already done.

Or rather, a patent to do this in a way that doesn't involve duct tape, and doing it cheaper. Its making the Ps3 work as a Ps2, not putting a Ps2 in there

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1521
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

Indigo_Dingo:

Covarr:
This doesn't offer anything that the older 80GB PS3 didn't already have, software emulation. This isn't a sign of things to come, just a patent for something they've already done.

Or rather, a patent to do this in a way that doesn't involve duct tape, and doing it cheaper. Its making the Ps3 work as a Ps2, not putting a Ps2 in there

Errrr... the first batch of Euro-PS3s played PS2 games on software (on an emulator), same with the older US 80GB PS3s. There were no PS2 parts in either of those. The first batch of 60GB US and JP PS3s had the PS2-on-a-chip solution but they were quickly replaced with ones that don't have that.

From a consumer standpoint this means that that they're basically gearing up for something that they were already doing. And dropped.

scotth266:

As far as this form of emulation goes, they're a little late to the party. After all, the 360 does BC via an emulator... so I'm kind of confused as to why Sony didn't see that and learn from it, especially when they heard all the complaints about the lack of BC.

The interesting part is that they were already running games on an emulator for a while and then decided to drop that too. A few games like Shadow of the Colossus ended up running with a noticeably higher framerate than on the original hardware but of course most ran understandably better on the real hardware. Like I said, a 2D game like Guilty Gear Accent Core had a 3 frame delay in inputs, which has a significant impact on the game (makes FRCs impossible for instance, some would say that basically makes the game unplayable).

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1364
Joined: 12 May 2009

Woe Is You:

Indigo_Dingo:

Covarr:
This doesn't offer anything that the older 80GB PS3 didn't already have, software emulation. This isn't a sign of things to come, just a patent for something they've already done.

Or rather, a patent to do this in a way that doesn't involve duct tape, and doing it cheaper. Its making the Ps3 work as a Ps2, not putting a Ps2 in there

Errrr... the first batch of Euro-PS3s played PS2 games on software (on an emulator), same with the older US 80GB PS3s. There were no PS2 parts in either of those. The first batch of 60GB US and JP PS3s had the PS2-on-a-chip solution but they were quickly replaced with ones that don't have that.

From a consumer standpoint this means that that they're basically gearing up for something that they were already doing. And dropped.

scotth266:

As far as this form of emulation goes, they're a little late to the party. After all, the 360 does BC via an emulator... so I'm kind of confused as to why Sony didn't see that and learn from it, especially when they heard all the complaints about the lack of BC.

The interesting part is that they were already running games on an emulator for a while and then decided to drop that too. A few games like Shadow of the Colossus ended up running with a noticeably higher framerate than on the original hardware but of course most ran understandably better on the real hardware. Like I said, a 2D game like Guilty Gear Accent Core had a 3 frame delay in inputs, which has a significant impact on the game (makes FRCs impossible for instance, some would say that basically makes the game unplayable).

I disagree, adding the BC back, only happens to open up several thousand games to PS3 owners. Many, many, many of which are PS Exclusives. Of course, this isn't an issue I have to deal with. My 60g loooooooooves those PS2 games.

And yeah, just an affirmation, all PS machines, from PS1 to PS3, plays PS1 games.

Morne

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1521
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

Mornelithe:

I disagree, adding the BC back, only happens to open up several thousand games to PS3 owners. Many, many, many of which are PS Exclusives. Of course, this isn't an issue I have to deal with. My 60g loooooooooves those PS2 games.

And yeah, just an affirmation, all PS machines, from PS1 to PS3, plays PS1 games.

Morne

I actually didn't say anything about being against PS2 games working -- I'm very much for it, in fact. The current solution of stripping even the emulation is the crappiest solution they could've come up with, but really, this waffling makes very little sense to me. They had two solutions for that and dropped them both. The whole thing's a mess.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1364
Joined: 12 May 2009

Woe Is You:

Mornelithe:

I disagree, adding the BC back, only happens to open up several thousand games to PS3 owners. Many, many, many of which are PS Exclusives. Of course, this isn't an issue I have to deal with. My 60g loooooooooves those PS2 games.

And yeah, just an affirmation, all PS machines, from PS1 to PS3, plays PS1 games.

Morne

I actually didn't say anything about being against PS2 games working -- I'm very much for it, in fact. The current solution of stripping even the emulation is the crappiest solution they could've come up with, but really, this waffling makes very little sense to me. They had two solutions for that and dropped them both. The whole thing's a mess.

Sorry Chief, that was a misquote, I was refering to ScottH266's post about being a bit late to the party.

FYI, the reason the previous software emulation was bunked, was because it didn't work on 100% of PS2 games. This new patent appears to be all-inclusive. The Hardware BC option, was simply too costly for manufacturing, not to mention that it would limit the amount of 'slimming' they would've been able to do with a slimline, down the road.

Morne

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

Woe Is You:

Indigo_Dingo:

Covarr:
This doesn't offer anything that the older 80GB PS3 didn't already have, software emulation. This isn't a sign of things to come, just a patent for something they've already done.

Or rather, a patent to do this in a way that doesn't involve duct tape, and doing it cheaper. Its making the Ps3 work as a Ps2, not putting a Ps2 in there

Errrr... the first batch of Euro-PS3s played PS2 games on software (on an emulator), same with the older US 80GB PS3s. There were no PS2 parts in either of those. The first batch of 60GB US and JP PS3s had the PS2-on-a-chip solution but they were quickly replaced with ones that don't have that.

From a consumer standpoint this means that that they're basically gearing up for something that they were already doing. And dropped.

scotth266:

As far as this form of emulation goes, they're a little late to the party. After all, the 360 does BC via an emulator... so I'm kind of confused as to why Sony didn't see that and learn from it, especially when they heard all the complaints about the lack of BC.

The interesting part is that they were already running games on an emulator for a while and then decided to drop that too. A few games like Shadow of the Colossus ended up running with a noticeably higher framerate than on the original hardware but of course most ran understandably better on the real hardware. Like I said, a 2D game like Guilty Gear Accent Core had a 3 frame delay in inputs, which has a significant impact on the game (makes FRCs impossible for instance, some would say that basically makes the game unplayable).

Didn't that only have a 30% success rate? Something this is trying to fix?

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1601
Joined: 26 Apr 2009

Actually, it was smart of Sony to remove PS2 compatibility. The Ps2 was still selling. DUH.

The Ps1 was no longer making systems and Sony wasn't cruel enough to force you to rebuy all your old games again *cough*NINTENDO*cough* so it was a smart move to put PS1 compat in it. Also, the internal mem card is a life saver.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4163
Joined: 6 Sep 2008

If they do this...

I will buy a PS3. Yes, the Wombat, enemy of Sony, shall buy one. Someday.

Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 634
Joined: 8 Jan 2009

Cid SilverWing:
Now all they need to do is sell more memory card USB adaptors so the players can transfer their PS1/2 saves to the PS3 drive in time for the unlocking of PS2-playing on it.

:D

No...
What they need to do is INCLUDE THOSE DAMN THINGS WITH THE CONSOLES FOR FREE!!
I mean, I spent $600 on my damn system, the LEAST they could do is chuck in what essentially amounts to a one-time-use item that probably costs .39 cents to manufacture along with my epic gaming console.

Honestly, why they didn't include some sort of additional port or adapter on the damn system to begin with to accept them is beyond me.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

TsunamiWombat:
If they do this...

I will buy a PS3. Yes, the Wombat, enemy of Sony, shall buy one. Someday.

No, the enemy of Sony was Eggo, and he bought one about four months ago.

BANNED
Posts: 12958
Joined: 30 Jan 2008

HyenaThePirate:

Cid SilverWing:
Now all they need to do is sell more memory card USB adaptors so the players can transfer their PS1/2 saves to the PS3 drive in time for the unlocking of PS2-playing on it.

:D

No...
What they need to do is INCLUDE THOSE DAMN THINGS WITH THE CONSOLES FOR FREE!!
I mean, I spent $600 on my damn system, the LEAST they could do is chuck in what essentially amounts to a one-time-use item that probably costs .39 cents to manufacture along with my epic gaming console.

Honestly, why they didn't include some sort of additional port or adapter on the damn system to begin with to accept them is beyond me.

They did. The original one had a Memory card slot in it.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 3208
Joined: 10 Nov 2007

Woe Is You:

Errrr... the first batch of Euro-PS3s played PS2 games on software (on an emulator), same with the older US 80GB PS3s. There were no PS2 parts in either of those. The first batch of 60GB US and JP PS3s had the PS2-on-a-chip solution but they were quickly replaced with ones that don't have that.

It was only partial emulation. The 80GB models and the european 60GB models have the Graphics Synthesiser chip in, they only do software emulation of the Emotion Engine.

The original one had a Memory card slot in it.

It doesn't, it has a set of flash card readers, but no PS3 model has a PS1/2 compatible memory card slot.

Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 634
Joined: 8 Jan 2009

Indigo_Dingo:
The original one had a Memory card slot in it.

I have an original 60 gig from launch.
I don't see a memory card slot anywhere.

Was this something excluded from North American versions?

Edit: Nevermind. seems you are wrong for once Indigo. It never had a memory card slot.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1521
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

GloatingSwine:

Woe Is You:

Errrr... the first batch of Euro-PS3s played PS2 games on software (on an emulator), same with the older US 80GB PS3s. There were no PS2 parts in either of those. The first batch of 60GB US and JP PS3s had the PS2-on-a-chip solution but they were quickly replaced with ones that don't have that.

It was only partial emulation. The 80GB models and the european 60GB models have the Graphics Synthesiser chip in, they only do software emulation of the Emotion Engine.

Hm. To be honest... if that's true, I'm even more confused. I thought the Emotion Engine and the Graphics Synthesizer were on one chip and that got nixed entirely. It'd make sense that they weren't running PS2 games on any original hardware considering the emulator could upscale them to HD resolutions.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1207
Joined: 17 Oct 2008

Woo! Its about time full backwards compatibality got here - there was something so strange about hearing the PS3 whine and the framerate fall to its knees playing the original ratchet and clank.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1154
Joined: 29 Oct 2008

bodyklok:
Well, my PS3 is already backwards compatible. And I hardly ever play PS2 games anyway. But I'm still pleased that this is happening, a lot of people with a new PS3 want to play old PS2 or PS1 games, so I'm happy for them at lest.

Me too.

At least it would make people get over the "boo, it's not backwards compatible, I'll buy one if it was" and they'll realize it's a seldom used feature, they own a PS2 (fair assumption) anyway and finally buy the damn thing.

There's a few articles about at the moment that make me think SONY aren't worried about things they should be.
Developers not supporting. Calls for price cuts. Negative press releases.

Come on, get back to the top.

 (Pages: 1, 2, 3)
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

You must be logged in to post.
Username:  
Password:  
  

Not registered? Sign up for a free account!

Forum Jump: