Though Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter has predicted that Sony will push ahead of Microsoft in five years' time, that's not going to happen, he thinks, if Nintendo puts out an HD-enabled version of the Wii.
Games industry Nostradamus Michael Pachter has some more fortune telling to do. Last time we checked in with Pachter he was predicting that the PS3 would steal second place in the console race from Microsoft by 2015, but now he's adding a disclaimer to that crystal ball vision. If Nintendo puts out an HD-capable upgrade to the Wii, he says, it could undermine the PS3's chances for a comeback.
"In our view, if Nintendo can offer such a device by year-end 2010, it will be in a position to seriously damage Sony's chances of a comeback this cycle," he said. So sure is Pachter of this that he's even coined his own word for this magical money printing box: the Wii Plus HD. "We would expect publishers to support such a move, given that the cost of porting an Xbox 360 game to the new Wii Plus HD format would likely be lower than the cost of building a ground up Wii game (we estimate under $5 million)."
With its cost-effectiveness and established popularity, the Wii Plus HD would be such an attractive proposition for consumers and publishers that it could figure not just as a huge success, but the absolute end-all-be-all of consoles.
"Should Nintendo be able to convince publishers like EA and Take-Two that the Wii Plus should be supported by the entire EA Sports catalog and by the next installment of Grand Theft Auto, it should be in a position to successfully convince consumers that the Wii Plus is the last console they will ever need to purchase," Pachter said.
You heard it here first, folks. The last console you will ever need to purchase. Agree, or disagree?
If i wanted a hd game system i play a 360 or ps3. I play the wii for games that only the wii can do . I don't play the wii for state of the art graphics. On side note has this guy ever been right?
hardly surprising considering how much the current Wii is smacking the PS3 around, personally im thinking whats going to happen with PCs considering how cheap it is now, to 2013 onwards which will completly outstrip the consoles in the hardware area
You heard it here first, folks. The last console you will ever need to purchase. Agree, or disagree?
Hahaha...hoo boy. That's a good one. Where to start? 1) The people driving the sales of the Wii aren't graphics whores, they're soccer moms and little kids. They won't care about HD. 2) You still can't control most modern day chart-toppers (your CoD's, Halo's, Metal Gear's, God of War's, etc.) with the TV remote controller. 3) The moment the Wii starts getting a steady flow of the dark, mature titles that serious gamers today want, the soccer moms will see that it is just another dirty videogame machine and stop buying into its manufactured charm. 4) There is a market for games that the Wii can't or won't deliver, so while it might stay in the lead, it won't be the only horse in the race.
Honestly, I see no reason why Nintendo WOULD put out a HD console. The Wii itself is fine for what it is, nobody that buys those games expect the best graphics. And hell, they would honestly be a waste given the style that the Wii tends to go. And no, I'm not just talking about hte shovelware, I'm referring to the bigger hits as well. Nintendo has bigger things to worry about with their console than adding HD support, although the reduced port costs I could see being a plus, but with how hard they would have to rework the games for the motion controls and all that jazz, I just don't see it being viable enough of an option for Nintendo to consider it.
Pendragon9: Yep. And now this entire thread will be filled with "omg this guy is totally right! I feel bad for doubting him! Sony sux!!!11!1"
If someone makes such a post, just know I called it.
What website did you think you were on? Most will disagree, followed by some kind of Wii bashing.
As for myself, people have been telling me how the benefits of a HD compatible Wii is axiomatic, but I still don't understand. A handful of games would truly look better on the Wii would they not? Surely a higher definition would mean that it would point out the shortcomings visually also? If a lot of developers put half assed work in Surely a higher output would make games look worse.
Perhaps someone should fill me in before I continue, am I not right?
Also the lower porting cost is interesting, it makes his claims hold some kind of weight. But I don't think there will be such an upgrade of a console. The Wii doesn't look like a console designed to last a decade in my eyes.
With its cost-effectiveness and established popularity, the Wii Plus HD would be such an attractive proposition for consumers and publishers that it could figure not just as a huge success, but the absolute end-all-be-all of consoles.
Yes, because upgrading the hardware of the Wii to make it HD capable would obviously cost no extra.. If they could offer a more powerful Wii and keep the price down, I am sure they would have. On another note, I actually like not having HD, it moves games visuals to be more artistic rather than relying on realistic graphics.
You heard it here first, folks. The last console you will ever need to purchase. Agree, or disagree?
Hahaha...hoo boy. That's a good one. Where to start? 1) The people driving the sales of the Wii aren't graphics whores, they're soccer moms and little kids. They won't care about HD. 2) You still can't control most modern day chart-toppers (your CoD's, Halo's, Metal Gear's, God of War's, etc.) with the TV remote controller. 3) The moment the Wii starts getting a steady flow of the dark, mature titles that serious gamers today want, the soccer moms will see that it is just another dirty videogame machine and stop buying into its manufactured charm. 4) There is a market for games that the Wii can't or won't deliver, so while it might stay in the lead, it won't be the only horse in the race.
EDIT: count this as "disagree"
Disagree with pretty much everything you said there.
If 2 is supposed to mean that you can't play first person shooters on a Wii-Remote, Call of Duty came out already, along with a wealth of FPS. Other games don't have to use the Remote, they can use the classic controller.
For 3, they are already flowing in. The sales are still coming in despite releases of MadWorld, House of The Dead Overkill, Resident Evil 4, Manhunt 2, and so on.
4 Well no sh*t in a sense. That's what console variety is there for in the end, and it's good. That part is where Pachter is full of his usual horse manure. And there are quite a few people who didn't buy MadWorld because it didn't have a higher television output, something I didn't understand.
With its cost-effectiveness and established popularity, the Wii Plus HD would be such an attractive proposition for consumers and publishers that it could figure not just as a huge success, but the absolute end-all-be-all of consoles.
Yes, because upgrading the hardware of the Wii to make it HD capable would obviously cost no extra.. If they could offer a more powerful Wii and keep the price down, I am sure they would have. On another note, I actually like not having HD, it moves games visuals to be more artistic rather than relying on realistic graphics.
first off the wii HD is like saying the fat anorexic. it just doesn't work. and no one would buy it just because it looks good, thats wat went wrong with the gamecube and killed nintendo. second, i doubt the wii could ever beat the ps3 since the fact of the matter is the wii has maybe 3 games that are good that aren't just the same thing as the stuff on the NES. thirdly, by then there will be a ps4, an xbox 720, and i don't know if nintendo will continue to make systems after the wii
Disagree with pretty much everything you said there.
If 2 is supposed to mean that you can't play first person shooters on a Wii-Remote, Call of Duty came out already, along with a wealth of FPS. Other games don't have to use the Remote, they can use the classic controller.
For 3, they are already flowing in. The sales are still coming in despite releases of MadWorld, House of The Dead Overkill, Resident Evil 4, Manhunt 2, and so on.
4 Well no sh*t in a sense. That's what console variety is there for in the end, and it's good. That part is where Pachter is full of his usual horse manure. And there are quite a few people who didn't buy MadWorld because it didn't have a higher television output, something I didn't understand.
A word of explanation... 2) The Wii got a gimped version of Call of Duty that received much worse scores than its counterparts. Red Steel was a disaster by all accounts. Metroid, while a first person game, is hardly a traditional shooter by any stretch of the imagination; I would file it under the "First Person Adventure" category. As for the classic controller, don't you remember game reviewers always griping about how awkward Gamecube controllers were for non-GC exclusive games?
3) I was going to mention MadWorld, but I was trying to keep it short and sweet. I left out Manhunt because they replaced all of the grisly kills with lens flare. This is the first wave of mature titles and rather sparse at that. And while MadWorld is certainly a violent spectacle (if not particularly mature), I would hardly say that the stream of adult titles is "flowing" yet.
4) *sniff* You don't need to be so mean. I was trying to point out that of course the Wii HD isn't the last console we will ever need.
dcomproductions: first off the wii HD is like saying the fat anorexic. it just doesn't work. and no one would buy it just because it looks good, thats wat went wrong with the gamecube and killed nintendo. second, i doubt the wii could ever beat the ps3 since the fact of the matter is the wii has maybe 3 games that are good that aren't just the same thing as the stuff on the NES. thirdly, by then there will be a ps4, an xbox 720, and i don't know if nintendo will continue to make systems after the wii
What the Wii has already stolen the fastest selling console title from the PS2 (which did outsell the PS3 one month) 2010 would mean the PS4 is still 5 years away same with 360 according to microsoft however I don't see a HD Wii Nintendo has expressed no interest in doing it but they will certainly make a new system someday how else could they continue as a business
4 Well no sh*t in a sense. That's what console variety is there for in the end, and it's good. That part is where Pachter is full of his usual horse manure. And there are quite a few people who didn't buy MadWorld because it didn't have a higher television output, something I didn't understand.
One more thing... Let's not forget the Wii's abysmal online infrastructure. Friend codes? No voice chat? I applaud Nintendo for going Wi-Fi, but their online system is even worse than Sony's. Regardless of all the cute minigame collections that the Wii has, the PS3 can let you get online, duke it out with strangers, and deliver then necessary smack talk.
Disagree with pretty much everything you said there.
If 2 is supposed to mean that you can't play first person shooters on a Wii-Remote, Call of Duty came out already, along with a wealth of FPS. Other games don't have to use the Remote, they can use the classic controller.
For 3, they are already flowing in. The sales are still coming in despite releases of MadWorld, House of The Dead Overkill, Resident Evil 4, Manhunt 2, and so on.
4 Well no sh*t in a sense. That's what console variety is there for in the end, and it's good. That part is where Pachter is full of his usual horse manure. And there are quite a few people who didn't buy MadWorld because it didn't have a higher television output, something I didn't understand.
A word of explanation... 2) The Wii got a gimped version of Call of Duty that received much worse scores than its counterparts. Red Steel was a disaster by all accounts. Metroid, while a first person game, is hardly a traditional shooter by any stretch of the imagination; I would file it under the "First Person Adventure" category. As for the classic controller, don't you remember game reviewers always griping about how awkward Gamecube controllers were for non-GC exclusive games?
3) I was going to mention MadWorld, but I was trying to keep it short and sweet. I left out Manhunt because they replaced all of the grisly kills with lens flare. This is the first wave of mature titles and rather sparse at that. And while MadWorld is certainly a violent spectacle (if not particularly mature), I would hardly say that the stream of adult titles is "flowing" yet.
4) *sniff* You don't need to be so mean. I was trying to point out that of course the Wii HD isn't the last console we will ever need.
Right:
A gimped version of a title does not mean that modern titles cannot be played on the Wii. Scores don't matter about whether the game is playable or not. What you said was 'You still can't control most modern day chart-toppers (your CoD's, Halo's, Metal Gear's, God of War's, etc.) with the TV remote controller. '
Which, in a sense, is nonsense. Call of duty still played fine. The Conduit has some of the best controls to date. Medal Of Honour Heroes 2 as well and Red Steel 2 is coming, which seems to have promising control. If you are trying to say that the Wii can't play games on the other consoles because of it's controller, for the most part this isn't true, at least for the titles you stated (the FPSs I mean, the controller is practically made for shooters)
Even when they do flow in, the crowd that don't like such titles won't refuse to buy the console because of that. The Manhunt 2 thing was done for all versions wasn't it? Also it was mainly to do with the stigma of that game being a little too immersive in killing, and the murders being a bit too much, and it getting an AO rating because of it.
Yeah sorry, I'll do that from time to time, I get carried away. Of course we are both correct on that field. ~_~
4 Well no sh*t in a sense. That's what console variety is there for in the end, and it's good. That part is where Pachter is full of his usual horse manure. And there are quite a few people who didn't buy MadWorld because it didn't have a higher television output, something I didn't understand.
One more thing... Let's not forget the Wii's abysmal online infrastructure. Friend codes? No voice chat? I applaud Nintendo for going Wi-Fi, but their online system is even worse than Sony's. Regardless of all the cute minigame collections that the Wii has, the PS3 can let you get online, duke it out with strangers, and deliver then necessary smack talk.
I'll say this much. Indeed it is worse than Sony's. However voice communication is there, it's in the Wii-Speak device. Friend codes are not necessary to play games online, but they hinder you from certain things like communication depending on the game (see The Conduit), it just seems that Nintendo thought that they could eliminate abuse and paedos. They were wrong on both counts.
The component itself is fine, it just seems to be poorly implemented at times. Mario Kart is seamless, for example, and so was Medal of Honour. Smash Bros can be bad but the problem with this is that it's four different connections. A fix can be made but it will have to be server wise. So if anything, Sony's is less trouble, but I wouldn't call it much better.
orannis62: Wait, Nintendo is already in first place, isn't it? Wasn't the issue whether or not Sony would over take Microsoft? How does Nintendo factor in?
I just don't know any more. Pachter is back to talking out of his ass it seems.
Screw this, I'm selling my 360, Wii, all my previous systems, including my NES, and PS2 (Stupid ex stole my PS1. Sorry, PC, Wii has a browser, so you're going too, I only need one console! Oh, Wii HD Plus Super Ultra Edition, why don't you stay in my room.... Do you think it'd be ok if I kept my DS? It's not a console, technically.... Right? I promise, though, I wont buy another!
orannis62: Wait, Nintendo is already in first place, isn't it? Wasn't the issue whether or not Sony would over take Microsoft? How does Nintendo factor in?
Oh, the concept is quite simple. Nintendo would essentially help those who want to spend more money, spend it on the Wii HD, instead of the PS3. Not all, sure, but enough. At least in his theory. Assuming the Wii HD had the public's love, sure it'd make sense. The PS3 is expensive, and most of the same games it plays are on the 360. OH! The Wii plays DVD's and higher quality Wii Sports?!?! GET ME THAT! ............. Sorry, I got carried away by the fact that I'm easily manipulated.
A gimped version of a title does not mean that modern titles cannot be played on the Wii. Scores don't matter about whether the game is playable or not. What you said was 'You still can't control most modern day chart-toppers (your CoD's, Halo's, Metal Gear's, God of War's, etc.) with the TV remote controller. '
Which, in a sense, is nonsense. Call of duty still played fine. The Conduit has some of the best controls to date. Medal Of Honour Heroes 2 as well and Red Steel 2 is coming, which seems to have promising control. If you are trying to say that the Wii can't play games on the other consoles because of it's controller, for the most part this isn't true, at least for the titles you stated (the FPSs I mean, the controller is practically made for shooters)
Even when they do flow in, the crowd that don't like such titles won't refuse to buy the console because of that. The Manhunt 2 thing was done for all versions wasn't it? Also it was mainly to do with the stigma of that game being a little too immersive in killing, and the murders being a bit too much, and it getting an AO rating because of it.
Yeah sorry, I'll do that from time to time, I get carried away. Of course we are both correct on that field. ~_~
I brought up the scores to illustrate that when the Wii tried to emulate its big brothers, it stumbled. Still, CoD 3 was 2 years ago. Neither of the last two iterations showed up on Nintendo's box. The Conduit has good buzz about the controls, but only because you have to do all the customization yourself. As for RS2 and MoH:H2, I don't deal in promise...we'll talk once they release.
Yes, I believe that Manhunt 2 was nerfed for the PS2 release as well.
You can't deny that one of the Wii's big selling points is family friendliness. Your average Wii ad shows a nuclear family in the living room, waving their arms and having a good time, or old people playing and having a good time. The message is "this isn't your average gaming console." If these people get the impression that the Wii is a "murder simulator" like the other consoles, I think that they will tune out. I will admit, though, that's just wild speculation.
I was just teasing about the last bit with the hurt feelings...all in good fun, yeah?
As someone who just got a Wii for their significant other, I'd be a bit pissed off if Nintendo suddenly offered a new Wii with prettier graphics. I'm not a total graphics whore... but there is a reason that the Wii is hers and the 360 is mine. >.>
Well.... Nintendo hasn't had solid 3rd party support since 1994, when the SNES was king. Even though there are 50 million Wiis sold, how many well-made, universally praised 3rd party titles are out on it?
Madworld Resident Evil 4
I'm at a loss to name anything else. And Madworld and RE4 didn't even sell shit for copies.
Nintendo has been drifting, doing their own thing for almost 15 years now, as far as consoles are concerned. They just managed to hit the magic bag this time out. We'll see if their next console can recapture the magic, or will all of the casual buyers/owners just keep their Wii and call it a day?
I'll say this much. Indeed it is worse than Sony's. However voice communication is there, it's in the Wii-Speak device. Friend codes are not necessary to play games online, but they hinder you from certain things like communication depending on the game (see The Conduit), it just seems that Nintendo thought that they could eliminate abuse and paedos. They were wrong on both counts.
The component itself is fine, it just seems to be poorly implemented at times. Mario Kart is seamless, for example, and so was Medal of Honour. Smash Bros can be bad but the problem with this is that it's four different connections. A fix can be made but it will have to be server wise. So if anything, Sony's is less trouble, but I wouldn't call it much better.
Also the minigame collection part confused me.
Why XBL heartily trumps the online experience for Wii, or PS3 for that matter, is because it is a uniform, strictly regulated service. You can't just flip a switch and change the way your company interfaces with the internet. You can host more servers and you can patch bugs, but implementing quality matchmaking, cross game invites, alerts, or a sane friending process is not going to happen without a massive overhaul. Even that would be difficult, though, since the Wii doesn't have the substantial harddrive that its competitors do. I was not aware of the Wii-Speak. Is it any good? I know the PS3 voice chat that I get is absolute garbage as far as quality goes.
Sorry if the part about the minigames was unclear. I was trying to illustrate the difference in experiences between the two consoles.
BeefSteak: As someone who just got a Wii for their significant other, I'd be a bit pissed off if Nintendo suddenly offered a new Wii with prettier graphics. I'm not a total graphics whore... but there is a reason that the Wii is hers and the 360 is mine. >.>
This article makes some interesting points. I never really thought of Wii HD. I would think if Nintendo goes HD they would do it in a new console specifically for HD graphic games. I like the Wii the way it is now. Not a serious digital home theatre system but a fun gaming console that supports older GameCube games and controllers.
orannis62: Wait, Nintendo is already in first place, isn't it? Wasn't the issue whether or not Sony would over take Microsoft? How does Nintendo factor in?
I believe what he's saying is that if Nintendo felt like being a bunch of jerks and knocking the PS3 out of the console war completely for no reasonably explored reason, they could. I'm not so sure though, considering the people who don't own a Wii as of now, probably don't because of another reason than just not having HD support. But then again, what do I know? I do own a Wii, after all.
2015? seriously? Who here expects Sony and Microsoft to NOT have replaced their systems by 2015?
The Xbox was released Nov 2001, the 360 followed in Nov 2005 (4 years). The PS2 was released Oct 2000, The PS3 followed in Nov 2006 (6 years).
We're expected to believe that Microsoft is going to leave it 10 years and Sony 9 years without releasing new consoles? I see a 0% likely hood of that and based on that alone I really can't take anything that this "analyst" says seriously.
Quite seriously, we can expect to see the new generation some time around 2012 (slightly later if the economy doesn't improve).
I'd say it holds some weight but then a question in my mind arises when we talk about consumer groups and video game consoles.
Do consumers now expect a video game console to be THE multimedia platform in the home where even the purchase of a game console does no longer mean the console will be used for its original purpose of playing video games?
This is where I find a divide. There are groups that want their console to do multiple things outside of the primary role and those who want a game console to play video games.
If the wii goes HD then fine but the question is what will Nintendo do if they make a new console? Become a DVD player as well? Allow applications like Facebook and netflix?
Why do consumers now expect so much out of a video game console that at the same time is blamed for all of society's ills?
I really hate this Michael Pachter. I'm pretty sure his job is to make unfounded claims, and so far seems to be a dedicated Sony hater.
But we will see, in the next 5 years, if none of his predictions come true then Im calling bullshit and will personally drive to his house to tell him :)
A gimped version of a title does not mean that modern titles cannot be played on the Wii. Scores don't matter about whether the game is playable or not. What you said was 'You still can't control most modern day chart-toppers (your CoD's, Halo's, Metal Gear's, God of War's, etc.) with the TV remote controller. '
Which, in a sense, is nonsense. Call of duty still played fine. The Conduit has some of the best controls to date. Medal Of Honour Heroes 2 as well and Red Steel 2 is coming, which seems to have promising control. If you are trying to say that the Wii can't play games on the other consoles because of it's controller, for the most part this isn't true, at least for the titles you stated (the FPSs I mean, the controller is practically made for shooters)
Even when they do flow in, the crowd that don't like such titles won't refuse to buy the console because of that. The Manhunt 2 thing was done for all versions wasn't it? Also it was mainly to do with the stigma of that game being a little too immersive in killing, and the murders being a bit too much, and it getting an AO rating because of it.
Yeah sorry, I'll do that from time to time, I get carried away. Of course we are both correct on that field. ~_~
I brought up the scores to illustrate that when the Wii tried to emulate its big brothers, it stumbled. Still, CoD 3 was 2 years ago. Neither of the last two iterations showed up on Nintendo's box. The Conduit has good buzz about the controls, but only because you have to do all the customization yourself. As for RS2 and MoH:H2, I don't deal in promise...we'll talk once they release.
Yes, I believe that Manhunt 2 was nerfed for the PS2 release as well.
You can't deny that one of the Wii's big selling points is family friendliness. Your average Wii ad shows a nuclear family in the living room, waving their arms and having a good time, or old people playing and having a good time. The message is "this isn't your average gaming console." If these people get the impression that the Wii is a "murder simulator" like the other consoles, I think that they will tune out. I will admit, though, that's just wild speculation.
I was just teasing about the last bit with the hurt feelings...all in good fun, yeah?
MoH H2 was released in 07 I believe, possibly 08. The controls were fairly customiseable, and the aiming was pretty much spot on. RS2 fair enough. Call of Duty 5 came out on the Wii, and Modern Warfare 2 is rumoured, and is possible considering that a modified CoD engine exists for the Wii thanks to CoD 5. It can and will get it's share of multiplat games, it seems.
What I always see on adverts is that, but what I always hear from Nintendo is that they want EVERYONE to play their console, not just families, everyone. I believe it is family friendly in the sense that it caters to that section of gamers as well, not that it doesn't have 'any of those nasty murder simulators' like the others. I doubt they would tune out because of a section of games, if that were the case then Natal will die on it's back (and I don't think it will).
I'll say this much. Indeed it is worse than Sony's. However voice communication is there, it's in the Wii-Speak device. Friend codes are not necessary to play games online, but they hinder you from certain things like communication depending on the game (see The Conduit), it just seems that Nintendo thought that they could eliminate abuse and paedos. They were wrong on both counts.
The component itself is fine, it just seems to be poorly implemented at times. Mario Kart is seamless, for example, and so was Medal of Honour. Smash Bros can be bad but the problem with this is that it's four different connections. A fix can be made but it will have to be server wise. So if anything, Sony's is less trouble, but I wouldn't call it much better.
Also the minigame collection part confused me.
Why XBL heartily trumps the online experience for Wii, or PS3 for that matter, is because it is a uniform, strictly regulated service. You can't just flip a switch and change the way your company interfaces with the internet. You can host more servers and you can patch bugs, but implementing quality matchmaking, cross game invites, alerts, or a sane friending process is not going to happen without a massive overhaul. Even that would be difficult, though, since the Wii doesn't have the substantial harddrive that its competitors do. I was not aware of the Wii-Speak. Is it any good? I know the PS3 voice chat that I get is absolute garbage as far as quality goes.
Sorry if the part about the minigames was unclear. I was trying to illustrate the difference in experiences between the two consoles.
Ah I see. I don't see the Wii as a minigame oriented experience, but each to their own.
XBL is easily the best online service besides the PC. What I was talking about with fixes and whatnot only really applied for Smash Bros. The service itself, like I was saying, is good but dependant on the games.
The Conduit features a matchmaking system it seems, and Medal Of Honour Heroes 2 featured a lobby system and messaging system via their own EA nation servers. Yes the Wii's online service itself is a simple shell to house online games, but at the same time the developers themselves can also make an effort. I don't think it should be effort on one side's part though, both should make an effort. On Nintendo's side, I don't see why they couldn't release a firmware update that has some kind of online service similar to the other two consoles, or at least some kind of bastard child. They have channels that kind of emulate it, but only some features. Either way it's not as good as XBL.
The Wii Speak device has been said to be good in games I've heard of, but not games I want to play. The thing is it's not a headset, it's a microphone that sits atop your tv and picks up your speech from where you are sitting. In games like animal crossing, it seems to work fine, however that game doesn't have gunfire and explosions, like The Conduit or similar games, and I am wondering if this will echo at all. I am going to try it once I buy the game because I am interested in how it will end up. Worst comes to worst I have headphones.
Extra Punctuation
Experienced Points
MovieBob: Intermission
First Person
Miracle of Sound: Encore
Loading Time
Hexproof
Ask Dr Mark
Backchat
Drinking Games
Escape to the Movies
Escapecraft
Escapist Podcast
Feed Dump
GinxTV
Jimquisition
LoadingReadyRun
Meatbag and Co
Media Sandwich
Miracle of Sound
No Right Answer
Pro-Gamer Gauntlet
Reviews
Tales from the Table
The Big Picture
The Escapist Presents
Trailers
Unskippable
Zero Punctuation
The Darkness II Review
Reckoning Review
Exodus Review
Final Fantasy XIII-2 Review
Scarygirl Review
Amy Review
Critical Miss
Name Game
Wii HD Could Crush PS3 Comeback, Says Pachter
Though Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter has predicted that Sony will push ahead of Microsoft in five years' time, that's not going to happen, he thinks, if Nintendo puts out an HD-enabled version of the Wii.
Games industry Nostradamus Michael Pachter has some more fortune telling to do. Last time we checked in with Pachter he was predicting that the PS3 would steal second place in the console race from Microsoft by 2015, but now he's adding a disclaimer to that crystal ball vision. If Nintendo puts out an HD-capable upgrade to the Wii, he says, it could undermine the PS3's chances for a comeback.
"In our view, if Nintendo can offer such a device by year-end 2010, it will be in a position to seriously damage Sony's chances of a comeback this cycle," he said. So sure is Pachter of this that he's even coined his own word for this magical money printing box: the Wii Plus HD. "We would expect publishers to support such a move, given that the cost of porting an Xbox 360 game to the new Wii Plus HD format would likely be lower than the cost of building a ground up Wii game (we estimate under $5 million)."
With its cost-effectiveness and established popularity, the Wii Plus HD would be such an attractive proposition for consumers and publishers that it could figure not just as a huge success, but the absolute end-all-be-all of consoles.
"Should Nintendo be able to convince publishers like EA and Take-Two that the Wii Plus should be supported by the entire EA Sports catalog and by the next installment of Grand Theft Auto, it should be in a position to successfully convince consumers that the Wii Plus is the last console they will ever need to purchase," Pachter said.
You heard it here first, folks. The last console you will ever need to purchase. Agree, or disagree?
[Via Destructoid]
Permalink