GTA IV Not Censored For Australia

Sometimes I just don't understand how this stuff works: Rockstar has confirmed that Grand Theft Auto IV for the PC has been given an MA15+ rating in Australia and will hit the shelves in all its uncensored glory.

A Rockstar representative told GameSpot that Australian audiences will be getting the same game as everyone else in the world, with none of the cuts that plagued the console release of the game. "The PC game is unedited in any way and identical in content to the international version," the rep said.

Good news for Australian gamers, but also a rather odd decision in light of the fact that the OFLC refused to issue a rating for the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 releases of the game until Rockstar edited sequences featuring "interactions" with hookers. So why the change of heart? GamePolitics has speculated that the Classification Office may be less concerned about the PC release of the game because it's not strictly a "gaming platform," or that it may have lost interest in it altogether because it's no longer the flagship hot-button game it was a year ago.

There's also the possibility that Rockstar itself is playing games to avoid controversy: That the international version of the PC release doesn't include the hooker scenes either, thus making the Australian version "identical in content." But that scenario seems unlikely; the ratings for the two editions of the game posted on the OFLC website feature a subtle but telling difference between the two. The console version of the game includes warnings of "Strong violence, strong coarse language, drug and sexual references," while the upcoming PC release is tagged "Strong violence, sex scenes, coarse language and drug references." "Sexual references" and "sex scenes" are two very different animals.

So it looks the Aussie crew is going to get the real deal when the PC edition of the game launches next year, but precisely why that is remains an unanswered question. Was it political opportunism at work, ignorance or outright incompetence? Not that it really matters; no matter how you look at it, the decision points to a seriously dysfunctional rating system that's effectively serving no one.

(PS. F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin is still Refused Classification. Figure that one out.)

Permalink

Xbox's and PS3's play movies and CD's too....Oh noes they are not strictly a gaming platform! Time to uncensor them!

Baffled.

Australia is known for its strict ratings and banning when it comes to games, but this one goes beyond.

Actually the mix of all these issues go beyond.

What is the reason for all this controversy?

...

They're probably just not bothered about the PC as a platform. It's not corrupting the kiddies anymore than the internet already is.

Well, they might have realized that it is MUCH simpler for PC players to get the uncensored content off of the internet than for console gamers, so they could be cutting down on piracy by making the uncensored version legal. In which case, this is a pretty genius move on the part of Australia.

Fear refused clasification?
Easy. FEAR 2 features a child who was repeatedly raped, tortured and brutalised as it's main antagonist. It's hard to justify a 15 rating for that.

As for GTA pc, no idea. Maybe they all have shares in Take2?

The fuck???

Being an Australian PC gamer, this should be good new for me, but all I feel is a resounding sense of bafflement.

It's not like ratings classification has ever been consistent or sensible anyway, so there's nothing new here :)

But I suspect Indigo_Dingo is right. They probably think that PC gamers tend to be older than console gamers -- not that this should matter when designating an age-specific rating level. (It still mystifies me why they're stubbornly resisting an R18 label though.)

Miral:
It still mystifies me why they're stubbornly resisting an R18 label though.

"They" is Michael Atkinson, Attorney-General of South Australia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Atkinson
Why the R18 verdict requires a unanimous decision is a mystery to me.

To be fair though, I saw an interview with him on TV about the issue and although I disagree with his stance, he described his opinions in a very sensible manner rather than ranting like Jack Thompson.

Lolwut?

Eh. These things used to get me so riled up. Now it's happening so often that it's just water off a duck's back to me.

Anyway, good that we get the normal version as well. Hopefully the government will listen and fix our rating system. How much longer until Micheal Atkinson is out of office, or is Attorney General an elected position?