Xbox One Ships Early, Microsoft Bans It

 Pages 1 2 3 NEXT
 

Xbox One Ships Early, Microsoft Bans It

Microsoft says a customer who received his Xbox One console early and was subsequently banned from Xbox Live for TOS violations will not face permanent exile.

In some ways, the Twitter user Moonlightswami is a very lucky fellow. Thanks to a screwup somewhere along the line at Target, he received his Xbox One console yesterday, a full two weeks before it's supposed to be released. He posted pictures of the console, the controller, the power brick and the packaging with his receipt attached to prove the veracity of his claim, as well as details about the size of the initial update, install sizes of various games and such little tidbits as Call of Duty: Ghosts coming with only one disc and no separate installation disc.

What happened next will likely come as no great surprise: Microsoft banned the console. Fortunately for Moonlightswami, his account wasn't banned, as he was still able to access it on his Xbox 360, but his Xbox One was left unable to go online. He seemed to take it well, urging his followers not to "cost yourselves a great experience" out of anger with Microsoft's reaction to his early access, but he also made it clear that he wasn't going to just roll over and accept punishment for something that clearly wasn't his fault.

But now it appears that a happy, or at least relatively conflict-free, ending is in the offing. Microsoft's Larry Hryb, aka Major Nelson, took to Twitter to state that the ban will not be permanent, and then expanded on that statement slightly on NeoGAF. "I reached out to him and I'll get this sorted out," the Major wrote. "His console will not be permabanned that is for sure."

But a banned console isn't the only headache that @Moonlightswami has to deal with because of this. An unboxing video he posted on YouTube was taken down because of a copyright claim by Microsoft, which puts a "copyright strike" against his account. Three copyright strikes results in account suspension and removal of all posted videos, but even just one can lead to a loss of access to various YouTube features. Microsoft hasn't said yet whether it will retract the claim or not.

Sources: Twitter, NeoGAF, via GameInformer

Permalink

the images on the article are screwed up.

that leaves a sour taste in every customers mouth.
you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.
i think its better to keep the money and use it for a short hookers, blackjack and drugs weekend instead.

You accidentally the article there Andy, might wanna edit it a bit.

OT: Good thing its not a permanent ban, that would suck for that guy, although he is a bit of a moron to show off a console that is not yet released, having a 500$ paperweight must not be fun.

Also, might be mistaken, but doesn't the Xbone need a patch to actually play games?

rhizhim:

you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.

To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

Also, to borrow a point that a lot of people brought up in the NeoGAF thread, it's funny Microsoft banned him because he pretty much brought positive PR to Microsoft by disproving a lot of the pre-release rumours that were going around.

I guess this comes back to the point in the latest Jimquisition that if people were less pretentiously vague about everything they would have much less shit to deal with.

I would say they should just ban it till release date, not his fault that Target derped. Glad Microsoft aren't being overly dickish about this, maybe they've learned from previous mistakes.

So, wait, he got an Xbone 2 weeks early and decided it'd be a good idea to hook it up to the internet and let Microsoft see what he's doing with it?

.........is there some new breed of special I haven't been informed of?

Banned = bricked console?
What in the unholy name of fuck...

Phrozenflame500:
To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

The article says it turned into a "very expensive doorstop".
Doorstops -no matter how expensive- don't play singleplayer games.

Vaccine:
So, wait, he got an Xbone 2 weeks early and decided it'd be a good idea to hook it up to the internet and let Microsoft see what he's doing with it?

.........is there some new breed of special I haven't been informed of?

You have to connect it to patch out all the "features" that they announced back at E3.

loa:
Banned = bricked console?
What in the unholy name of fuck...

I thought this was already known? that if a Xbone is banned from xbox live and is connected to the internet at the time it also stops the console working altogether.

Yep found the article

( http://wegotthiscovered.com/gaming/banned-xbl-result-losing-xbox-one-games/ )

From the Xbox One ToS

"Any software or content (e.g., text, images, video, graphics, music, sound, or games) (for purposes of this section, we refer to all of these, as applicable, as "Software") that Microsoft provides as part of the Services is licensed and not sold and is licensed according to the terms of this Agreement unless separate license terms are provided or referenced. We may automatically download Software upgrades to your Authorized Device to update, enhance, protect, or further develop the Services. We reserve all other rights not expressly granted in this Agreement. The Software license ends when your Services end unless we notify you otherwise. You must then uninstall the Software, or we may disable it. You must not work around any technical limitations in the Software."

Phrozenflame500:

rhizhim:

you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.

To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

Also, to borrow a point that a lot of people brought up in the NeoGAF thread, it's funny Microsoft banned him because he pretty much brought positive PR to Microsoft by disproving a lot of the pre-release rumours that were going around.

I guess this comes back to the point in the latest Jimquisition that if people were less pretentiously vague about everything they would have much less shit to deal with.

i was considering that you have to sign onto their servers once a day or so and this might affect you more than you can imagine with such a ban,

plus didnt the xbox need a day one patch?

I don't get it.
What part of an unboxing video is copyrighted material that belongs to microsoft?

Xan Krieger:
I would say they should just ban it till release date, not his fault that Target derped. Glad Microsoft aren't being overly dickish about this, maybe they've learned from previous mistakes.

I'll wait until we see whether they undo the ban and the copyright claim at actual release. Leaving either in place counts as pretty damn "overly dickish" to my eyes.

I can see Microsoft banning the console as soon as the thing connected to the net. I'm sure Microsoft will unblock the guy once the release date has come and gone so if anything he's been essentially grounded by Microsoft. I don't know if his youtube account will be salvageable though...he may have to start a new one or go elsewhere.

Either way, he was an idiot for posting pictures and videos but he was screwed the moment he put that thing online for the update.

rhizhim:

i was considering that you have to sign onto their servers once a day or so and this might affect you more than you can imagine with such a ban,

plus didnt the xbox need a day one patch?

Microsoft pulled a xBox 180 (hehehehe) on the mandatory sign ins a while ago, now it's fully possible to keep the console offline indefinitely.

And while it's true the xBone needs a 500mb day-one patch, the patch is already live for some reason.

Costia:
I don't get it.
What part of an unboxing video is copyrighted material that belongs to microsoft?

None, youtube just has an automated multi-purpose "take down" button for large companies.
They can basically do whatever.

loa:

The article says it turned into a "very expensive doorstop".
Doorstops -no matter how expensive- don't play singleplayer games.

The article is wrong, banned consoles can still play offline games, albeit the disk is required.

The guy posted pictures of Call of Duty: Ghosts on his Twitter, he's obviously playing it.

Phrozenflame500:

loa:

The article says it turned into a "very expensive doorstop".
Doorstops -no matter how expensive- don't play singleplayer games.

The article is wrong, banned consoles can still play offline games, albeit the disk is required.

The guy posted pictures of Call of Duty: Ghosts on his Twitter, he's obviously playing it.

A game that was released for the PS3, 360 and coming to next gen console being played?

SOMEONE CALL THE INQUISITION, WE GOTS SOME HERESY OVER HERE!

Kalezian:

A game that was released for the PS3, 360 and coming to next gen console being played?

SOMEONE CALL THE INQUISITION, WE GOTS SOME HERESY OVER HERE!

Screenshot with X1 interface in view.

There are some more comparisons w/screenshots here.

Phrozenflame500:

rhizhim:

you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.

To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

Actually if you can't download the Day one patch, you can't play your purchased single-player games. Messed up MS.

Phrozenflame500:

rhizhim:

you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.

To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

Also, to borrow a point that a lot of people brought up in the NeoGAF thread, it's funny Microsoft banned him because he pretty much brought positive PR to Microsoft by disproving a lot of the pre-release rumours that were going around.

I guess this comes back to the point in the latest Jimquisition that if people were less pretentiously vague about everything they would have much less shit to deal with.

You know it makes me kinda curious about what sort of power microsoft has over Let's plays and stuff made via the Xbox One and it's twitch streaming/youtube posting capabilities.

Since you make your let plays, via the xbone now, can microsoft take one down by claiming ownership if it is being critical of a game they want to succeed?

This is why I'd rather spend $500 on PC hardware, NVIDIA or AMD for example won't not pull a dick move like this on a customer.
Microsoft would not know good customer service if it gave them a free blow job with a lap dance.

I've changed the wording of the post to state simply that the console cannot currently go online, which will hopefully eliminate some of the confusion. (I doubt it will, since nobody seems entirely sure what exactly that will effect, but dare to dream.)

Not sure about the image complaint, though. What's screwed up? It looks fine to me.

I can only guess why they didn't just put a stop-gap "countdown" script for the activation patch on their servers.
Y'know, instead of AUTO-BANNING THE CONSOLE.

Said guess involves corporate paranoia over people looking to probe their firmware and servers for vulnerabilities, but even that isn't impossible to prevent; just put a public "NOT READY TO LAUNCH" front-end server on your domain, and hook or enable the actual patch servers when the console officially goes live.

Sounds like lovely clusterfuck, but in the end not much harm done.

However I'm betting Target is going to catch some serous hell from Microsoft for this slip up. Companies tend to take release dates VERY seriously.

The most worrying bit of this story is that MS can just disable a console like that, does anyone knoe if there's anything similar on the PS4 (I haven't heard anything either way so far)?

I can sort of understand Microsoft stopping the console being used if they don't want/ can't support its use until the release date (although I still think there's no real need for it) but blocking an unboxing video on YouTube? They must have known they'd be getting bad press for doing that, the video's doing them/ the console no harm and they just come off as dicks harming someone's account purely because they can.

I'd love to know what consequences there will be for those responsible for the early console dispatch...

Microsoft is getting praise for this? We're supposed to be pleased their "Oh @#$%, we take it back, we take it back!" PR reflexes are getting honed to a razor keenness?

I think they're just lucky the early send didn't end up in the hands of someone with a less positive view of their company; they could have been left bleeding from a whole new fresh set of wounds, just in time for the holiday season.

Andy Chalk:
Not sure about the image complaint, though. What's screwed up? It looks fine to me.

Can't speak for anyone else, but here's how the front page of the article presents for me:

image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

(That's at 1920x1080, on Chrome.)

Costia:
I don't get it.
What part of an unboxing video is copyrighted material that belongs to microsoft?

You seem to think that DMCA takedowns are used because of copyright infringement rather than censorship. Youtube doesn't care about the validity of takedown claims, they just take a video down because someone said to even if there is no copyrighted material involved. It's cheaper that way.

I feel sorry for this guy, he's wasted $500 buying an Xbone. He could buy enough gravy to fill a bathtub with that much money.

Phrozenflame500:

rhizhim:

you just have a 500$ console that can magically be turned into a brick at any time for stupid reasons.

To clarify, he was console banned. This means that the console can not access xBox Live , but it can still play purchased single-player games.

Not without the day one update Microsoft already announced.

I don't really see the issue here. Guy got a console he knew he wasn't supposed to have, and bragged about it online. Got banned. What did he expect? Microsoft to just let it go?

And remotely banning an Xbox account is a feature that's been around since the 360, it's nothing new.

I get that Target shares some blame in it, but that doesn't absolve this guy of all responsibility. It's like if someone left the keys in their car and you just drove off with it, then posted selfies all over facebook. You wouldn't just get off scot-free.

I'm not praising Microsoft or anything, but I think they're justified in trying to keep the console under-wraps from the public until official release.

Also I think this guy probably would have been fine if he didn't blatantly brag about it over social media. He wouldn't have had his account banned and would have been able to enjoy the console early in private.

Vivi22:

Not without the day one update Microsoft already announced.

He downloaded the Day-One update before he got console banned. I posted a link to a NeoGAF thread full of screenshots of the UI and the X1 version of CoD Ghosts in one of my earlier posts.

Would be funny to have Sony "accidentally" ship a console or two early then make a big deal that they won't be ##$#$ like MS.

Wait wait wait, so he gets a console early because target fucked up (anyone with a braincell would know they weren't suppose to have one yet), This genius decides to connect it to the internet and brag about on the internet, and automatic systems flag videos, and ban his console, Microsoft realise it was an honest mistake and say they're going to help the guy out, and yet.....Microsoft are the bad guys here?
Fucking Sony fanboys. If anyone fucked up here it's target. Let's not pretend that Sony would be OK with someone spilling the beans on the PS4 weeks before release and ruining any exclusive early access coverage deals they have with press outlets.

Battenberg:
The most worrying bit of this story is that MS can just disable a console like that, does anyone knoe if there's anything similar on the PS4 (I haven't heard anything either way so far)?

I can sort of understand Microsoft stopping the console being used if they don't want/ can't support its use until the release date (although I still think there's no real need for it) but blocking an unboxing video on YouTube? They must have known they'd be getting bad press for doing that, the video's doing them/ the console no harm and they just come off as dicks harming someone's account purely because they can.

I'd love to know what consequences there will be for those responsible for the early console dispatch...

all companys have some certian control of each perspective console.the 360 and ps3 we're no different on that matter

So he gets his console earlier than he was supposed to, and Microsoft changes it so he can only use it when he's supposed to. And Microsoft is painted as the bad guy... Why, exactly?

I'm going to have to let the MS-hate bandwagon go this time. I'll get back on if the guy announces on launch day that he's still got a $500 brick in his house.

Oh and bless my garters, they can remotely disable his Xbone? What, just like the 360? Whoopdie do, it apparently wasn't a big deal then, not sure why it's a big deal now.

Seriously guys, calm the flying fuck down. There are many reasons to get pissed at Microsoft's handling of the Xbone, but this is not one of them.

Though the whole YT takedown thing was interesting, but not really surprising. Considering that they've gone out of their way to show as little as possible of the device before it gets released, I suppose they didn't want someone showing what they were trying so hard to hide.

sethisjimmy:

I get that Target shares some blame in it, but that doesn't absolve this guy of all responsibility. It's like if someone left the keys in their car and you just drove off with it, then posted selfies all over facebook. You wouldn't just get off scot-free.

This is NOTHING like that. He paid for and legally owns the console. This would be like if he bought a car and the dealer delivered it to him a couple weeks early so he took a few pictures and drove it around the block, then had his license taken away for 'violating the terms of service'.

I'd like to know which part of the terms he violated, actually. It seems strange that they'd have a clause in there about using the console before the launch date. Especially since in order to read and agree to the terms you would have to use the console.

 Pages 1 2 3 NEXT

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below:
With Facebook:Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with The Escapist:
Register With Facebook
Register With Facebook
or
Register for a free account here