Kim Dotcom Can Have His Stuff Back, Court Rules

Kim Dotcom Can Have His Stuff Back, Court Rules

A New Zealand court has denied a request to extend the freeze on Kim Dotcom's assets.

In the lead-up to the 2012 raid on Kim Dotcom's mansion in New Zealand, restraining orders were granted that put a freeze on his assets and allowed authorities to seize properties like cars and artwork. But those orders are due to expire on April 18, and while the Crown made application to extend them, the New Zealand High Court rejected the request.

The basis for the rejection lies in the reason for extension application. The original restraining orders were granted as part of the criminal prosecution, but the request for extension is based on a "future action for civil forfeiture," according to RT.com, and Dotcom's lawyer successfully argued that New Zealand's Criminal Proceeds Act does not allow restraining orders to be extended based on new grounds. The "future action" presumably ties in to lawsuits filed against Dotcom by various Hollywood studios and the RIAA, alleging that he earned huge profits by promoting copyright infringement through the now-defunct Megaupload service.

Dotcom was predictably happy with the ruling. "The NZ asset ruling is HUGE. We've just filed a case in Hong Kong against unlawful seizure of #Megaupload. The U.S. case is falling apart!" he tweeted. "Our assets were seized for 800 days and still I was able to fight back even with my hands tied behind my back. Imagine what I can do now!!!"

Although not quite "now," actually. The order freezing Dotcom's assets will remain in place for another 14 days to give the Crown time to appeal the ruling.

Source: Twitter, RT

Permalink

I really don't know how much I hate/like Kim.

You know what? good for him. There was a time where I might have considered this a evil vs. evil situation, but the longer it goes on the more willfully dickish the law enforcement seems and the more amusing and likable I find dotcom. So I'm rooting for him, I hope he gets away scott free and leaves the people responsible footing the bill.

I've been viewing this as a group of by-the-letter-of-the-law doofusses throwing their weight around at the smug-but-essentially-harmless site owner. There is law, but there is also pointless power grabs, leading to a gray-on-gray sort of situation. There really isn't a good or bad to this, except that the lawmen are being kind of hamfisted and dickish about it.

ya'know I'd be more behind the plight of free internet if it wasn't spearheaded by guys like Kim Dotcom whose every action makes me hate him more.

I don't think the case is falling apart. He just got his personal stuff back. They probably recorded all the evidence they wanted from that a while ago. Kim, you're getting too optimistic, and you look like a jackass in that tweet.

If the trial doesn't go their way, I just know the MAFIAA is going to pressure US and NZ politicians to get their way somehow. Dotcom is just the first(actually second counting the Pirate Bay guys) of many targets in the eyes of Big Media.

I just hope the innocent people of the world don't get caught in the crossfire. Imagine if all file hosts were blocked in many countries or had to allow the FBI to search their data bases for pirated material. Or some other horrible practice most every government agreed to let happen at the behest of overpaid media execs.

Hairless Mammoth:
I don't think the case is falling apart. He just got his personal stuff back. They probably recorded all the evidence they wanted from that a while ago. Kim, you're getting too optimistic, and you look like a jackass in that tweet.

If the trial doesn't go their way, I just know the MAFIAA is going to pressure US and NZ politicians to get their way somehow. Dotcom is just the first(actually second counting the Pirate Bay guys) of many targets in the eyes of Big Media.

I just hope the innocent people of the world don't get caught in the crossfire. Imagine if all file hosts were blocked in many countries or had to allow the FBI to search their data bases for pirated material. Or some other horrible practice most every government agreed to let happen at the behest of overpaid media execs.

That is just what I worried about. If the government fails to successfully prosecute someone who appear really guilty like this, then I think there is going to be a huge boost to those people who are trying to pass the really horrible copyright laws like SOPA.

Will they go after sites like OneDrive, run by Microsoft, where it is quite possible to share files with others?

Don't file sharing sites have systems in place for people to claim copyright infringment?

It's hard to form an opinion on Dotcom. On the one hand he's looking to install a new Internet fibre cable here in New Zealand so that our Internet will no longer be akin to something you'd get in a third world country, but he's also a bit of an eccentric personality that makes him look a bit dickish. I really have no idea what to think.

Good, if they can't put a case together agenst him you are just flexing your muscles and trying to threaten anyone into obeying you even if its not the law.

I too thought he was a bit of a dick initially, but if you watch the interview VICE did with him, I actually thought he came across as a pretty decent guy. Eccentric, and a bit over-the-top yes, but still down to earth at the same time.

votemarvel:
Don't file sharing sites have systems in place for people to claim copyright infringment?

God, i hope they dont. See, the way the law works currently, is that i could file a complaint agianst escapist copyrighting whatever content, and they would have to take it down, no questions asked, and only after taking it down prove they are not breaking copyright, while afterwards the claim is lifted i could just put the same identical claim again the next day. and yet i would get 0 reprecution for it, because its always the burden on the one i claim about and never mine to prove copyright even if i dont actually hold any. this has lead to a lot of troll companies claiming copyrights they dont own to witchunt certain websites and ruin their traffic, sucesfully.

FalloutJack:
I've been viewing this as a group of by-the-letter-of-the-law doofusses throwing their weight around at the smug-but-essentially-harmless site owner. There is law, but there is also pointless power grabs, leading to a gray-on-gray sort of situation. There really isn't a good or bad to this, except that the lawmen are being kind of hamfisted and dickish about it.

The way i view it is, MEGA was operating a lot like many start up companies did that have since become 'reputable' darlings of the establishment. What if the authorities had decided to raid youtube's owners when copywrited material was still rife on the site in the early days? It seems to me that heavy-handed actions like this, DNS exclusions, court injunctions and site seizures are hitting the genuinely bad but also killing of companies undergoing growing pains and that could have built into a fully legitimate service.

It reminds me of when the RIAA sued all the client based file-sharing servies out of existence at a time when torrents had effectively rendered them obsolete anyway. They had an opportunity to, maybe, work work some of them in the area of distributed hosting. The music industry is having their music reproduced and hosted for free and distributed in a decentralized manner by users. But the upside is if they can harness this then music has ZERO cost to distribute or host.

But the time for that kind of innovation has long past. The pirates have long cemented their complete control over whole types of services that could have been integrated into legitimate distribution.

Great, now if only -I- could recover the files of personal stuff that I lost in this mess.

Hey, good for hi*looks at picture* fuck that guy

I always wondered why only Megaupload was singled out, and not rapidshare or depositfiles. Or why the FBI waited to raid his assests until SOPA was being debated in Conress...

Feel free to put on tinfoil hat and play the Megabox-card, as most techsites speculated. If Kim tries that again, I fully expect Navy SEAL at his door with full retinue of tanks, aircraft carriers and what-have-you as if they got every terrorist leader ever in one place.

 

Reply to Thread

Log in or Register to Comment
Have an account? Login below:
With Facebook:Login With Facebook
or
Username:  
Password:  
  
Not registered? To sign up for an account with The Escapist:
Register With Facebook
Register With Facebook
or
Register for a free account here