When I was five years old, I got a Nintendo Entertainment System for my birthday. I grew up playing games made by Nintendo, Sega, Tecmo, and Square, just to name a few. I grew older, and my systems became more powerful, but I was still playing games made by the same people. I loved Mario and Zelda games, Sonic, Final Fantasy, and more.

So what happened? I realize that I won't touch almost anything made by those people anymore.

Nintendo is too busy rolling around in money they got from soccer moms to care about making games for me with any frequency. One Zelda, Mario or Metroid game every other year isn't enough to keep me, and many others, interested. And since Nintendo is making so much money with their simpler games for people that aren't "gamers" it's unlikely that this will change anytime soon. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm glad Nintendo is doing well, I'm just not interested in what they're selling anymore.

Sega. Dear lord. Yahtzee summed this one up pretty well in the Sonic Unleashed ZP. They need to be taken out behind the tool shed and put out of their misery. They keep trying to sell us increasingly poorly made Sonic games and many of there other IPs are a little on the lackluster side.

I'm sure this statement will be flamed. I don't care. This is my opinion. Square-Enix. Formerly know as Squaresoft. In their better days. They can't stop beating the VERY DEAD Final Fantasy horse to make anything that is any good these days. Square hasn't put out a great game in about ten years. The best stuff they've put out in recent years are remakes of their classics for the DS and PSP. They made a lot of mistakes with regards to prioritizing what games to make, in my opinion. Final Fantasy was ALWAYS too important to be put on hold to give any time or money to something that might end up being better. Xenogears, FF Tactics, and Chrono Trigger are all games that had great potential but got minimal attention in favor of the latest FF to have an over convoluted, ridiculous storyline played out by a cast of feminine emo boys and their slutty girlfriends. Even Kingdom Hearts, a decent series with a lot of potential hasn't seen a full console release in over 3 years now with nothing new in site (I'm not talking about hand held stuff).

Finally, there's Sony. The PS1 and 2 were great. I loved them and hundreds of games for them. Now we have the PS3. I want to like it. I really do. I have one and it mostly collects dust when I'm not watching movies on it. I haven't played a game on it since MGS4. Its an overpowered, under supported machine with only a handful of great games and a poor substitute for Xbox Live. I know that makes me sound like an MS fanboy. I'm not. I just like whats good. The console came out 2 years before its "community" software was available and it [Home] is a JOKE. It's like Sony looked at their competition in MS and said: "Let's do something different! It will be great! We'll take out everything that makes any sense or makes it any good, and then release it and call ourselves awesome! People will believe us because we made the PS2 and that was awesome, so this will be awesome!"

So now I find myself playing games mostly on my Xbox 360 and PC. And the games I play are made by studios and companies like Valve, Blizzard, Bethesda, Lionhead, and Ubisoft. None of those studios are japanese.

The gaming industry became a success because of Japanese developers in the 1980's. But I have to wonder if the Japanese are past their prime in the industry. Obviously they aren't out yet, especially Nintendo. What will they do in the future?

Share your opinions.

TL/DR: Don't post. If you're too lazy to read my opinion, I don't wanna read yours either.

you could be right, Nintendo and sega do seem to be stuck in a whirlpool of suck.

but for me there just seems to be nothing to interest me in buying...i'll look at a game and say "i'd like to try that....but not for $60" no games interest me enough to purchase them at their current prices

this happened with gift cards too, i ended up buying movies even though i wanted to buy and try a video game, maybe i need my head examined

Thumbs up, my friend. It seems that all Japanese devs have concentrated on their respective franchises and stopped developing anything original, or at least dont export the product.

Final Fantasy was an excellent series, but after FFVII it all went downhill. Slowly at first, but the crap-wagon really started trucking towards the bottom when FFX came out and that god-awful sequel FFX-2. But if you really wanna talk about dead horses, then Mario, Zelda and Sonic would be the foremost.

But yah, I see your point. Companies like Blizzard, Harmonix and Ubisoft are producing the real good games right now. Everyone else seems to be going after the casuals, lately. But all is not lost, I think. Capcom still seems to be producing quality stuff. Street Fighter IV looks awesome and Megaman 9 looks like a return to classic form.

Sheesh, you're just changing gaming style. I would like to make a correction though. It's not Sega that needs to be shot for its on good. It's team Sonic.

The JRPG Will never die!
*beats inner fangirl with brute hammer*

I've got a point there. Things won't ever stop being made, its just that they're having a bit of a hard time appealing to the western audience. Just wait 'till FF13 and KH3 come out.

I have no idea what they could do aside from Sony. They still have a good chance in my opinion because they're into consoles and not the actual games. I also like the PS3 more than the 360 even if the internet sucks.

Nintendo might want to think of something else. They could improve the Wii and with it make a whole new series that people in 2040 will complain about being too overly done. The Legend Of Super Metroid! I'm kidding, in all honesty, I think that that's the only thing they can do. Unless they want to make "Mii! The Video Game"

I was never a fan of Square-Enix. I like anime, but it's all I can do to stop suicide from taking me before the ending credits of an episode do. Let me put it more simply: I don't want to play an anime. The only one I could probably live through would be Valkyrian Chronicles or if they made an Azumanga Daioh video game. What they can try to do is switch their focus, before they make "Final Fantasy 19867: The Unending Dream"
I don't know what they would make, but just something non-Final Fantasy-ish.

Oh, I almost forgot Sega. The only way they'll come back is through a Dreamcast 2 and more 2D sonic games, that's it. Anything else will KILL THEM!... unless I get to them first.

By the way you never said anything about Konami, what's your opinion on them?

I think Japanese devs suffer from the same problems devs do over here, and maybe more so because of the domestic interest in their products. As companies go from development studios to giant money-making conglomerates, what will sell becomes more important than what is original or well made. So mass-marketed crap gets churned out because the money people know it will sell, while original ideas get shot down because so much money rides on it now.

Look at what happened to Tomonobu Itagaki and Team Ninja. Money makes artistic and programming ability irrelevant.

@johnx61:
Yea I kinda agree with you. I LOVE Zelda games, but they do need to do something different with the series. I don't know what, just that the last few games have all been very similar.

@Random Argument:
Once again I agree, but Team Sonic is like 90% of what Sega is, so I kinda just put them all in the same boat.

@Erana:
How I wish the JRPG would live on forever. I grew up loving the earlier FFs like 4 and 6. ^ is one of my all time favorite RPGs, alongside Xenogears and Chrono Trigger. Sadly the genre has become stale and predictable. The only time it ISN'T predictable is when it makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. Which, in recent title I've tried, is about 98% of the time.

I think Nintendo is just riding the profits from all their casual games. I'd like to see more games that appeal to hardcore gamers, but the more I look the more I think the Wii simply wasn't built with the intention of catering to us.
Maybe they'll change their tune when releasing their next console. I hope they do.

Frankly I think blizzard is as guilty, if not more guilty of forcing themselves in a rut than any Japanese developers. Think about it a moment. The Diablo games really have not evolved much, in fact they have evolved arguably less than Mario considering they are all the same watered down bare bones hack and slash games that have sadly sparked here in the US. Then you have Warcraft and starcraft, both decent RTS series in their time though in the end Warcraft has not evolved too much and its looking like Starcraft won't evolve at all save that it will take 3 years to fully release starcraft 2. Then we have WoW. Another case where they refuse to make something 'original' and instead make a game that pasts the Warcraft Mythos over the Sucky Diablo 2 mechanics to create low rent digital crack everyone else wants to copy. I don't understand why its ok for Blizzard to recycle everything over and over again but not ok for Nintendo to do so. I won't defend sega because they have mismanaged sonic (Put in princes sally damnit) but it seems that all the media-driven anti nintendo hype is about the fact that they won't put out anything new. I am glad someone pointed out that other developers don't either but the problem is just as prevalent in the US as it is in Japan.

The only real diffrence between Mario and Master Cheif other than MC being made of suck and plot armor is that mario has been around longer. Yes that makes people bitch about how Mario is old and stale but really so is every other story if you think about it. Everything still follows the monomyth regardless of what you have. Nintendo just decides to do what People seem to love blizzard for and work with characters that already have high recognition world wide and large fan bases for their flagship games. Japanese game developers are no more or less responsible than US developers for the stagnation in the industry they just have the bigger bullseye because they have on average been at it longer.

Unfortunately people can't seem to enjoy games now without a new character each time though, and that is kind of sad. people should be able to have fun with games regardless of the thin veil over it if the game is well made.

LucanDesmond:
Sega. Dear lord. Yahtzee summed this one up pretty well in the Sonic Unleashed ZP. They need to be taken out behind the tool shed and put out of their misery. They keep trying to sell us increasingly poorly made Sonic games and many of there other IPs are a little on the lackluster side.

Um, what? In Valkyria Chronicles they released a game which many, including myself, consider to be the obvious GOTY. It might not have sold well over here but that doesn't mean it wasn't worth playing.

The Japanese still make best games but the gap isn't quite as wide as it once was. I'd still say it's pretty wide though. Mirror's Edge, Resistance 2 and LBP were the only "Western" titles which I really enjoyed this year.

Oh yea Konami. They have two game series I care about. MGS and Castlevania. MGS4 was ok, the story was a little on the crazy side, but I accept that because I've been accepting it for ten years now. And Castlevania, well it needs to just stick to hand helds, because thats where it's best these days.

@harhol:
I missed Valkyria Chronicles. I haven't tried it yet, but I heard good things. Forgot it was Sega game. Hopefully it's good, because Sega needs it.

RedMenace:
Thumbs up, my friend. It seems that all Japanese devs have concentrated on their respective franchises and stopped developing anything original, or at least dont export the product.

I second that. I think that's the key problem with many of these Japanese companies. They were some of the first and produced some of the first product lines that become very popular and a mainstay in the gaming culture. Unfortunately, they are not innovating anymore. Sure, they try and experiment with a few concepts here and there... but nothing that's really unique or different from what they have been doing. I mean... Mario has had more side jobs than Mike Rowe has had Dirty Jobs.

The issue is that when you are using established characters and worlds, you are bound by what is acceptable based on those character and worlds. So, you can only stretch the limits so far without breaking something. Many Western developers have recently created whole new intellectual properties to introduce new types of game play. A good example is Gears of War. If the had tried to implement this style of game play in their previous line-up the game world have flopped horribly, but with a fresh start it was a success.

So Nintendo, Sony, Square-Enix, etc, etc,... they need to carve out a blank slate to build upon. They just need to roll the dice on something new. If anything they might benefit by snatching a few designers and writers from non-Japanese origins and shake things up a bit. Find a few out in the fringes or independent designers and give them a chance to cook something up. I'll volunteer!

Sometimes, you just have to gamble, folks.

Damn, I was hoping to be inb4 the obligatory "FFVII was the last great offering" praise, but alas, I had stuff to do today.
Yes, Squeenix has been on the downhill trot, but so has every thing in video games. It's all about the glitzy glam of the visuals than about the story. My point though, is that while I've watched Samus, Mario, Link, Sonic, and Megaman slip into (and in many cases, well beyond) mediocrity, the one thing I can stand tall and proud to exclaim is that the Final Fantasy franchise is still alive.
The average video gamer will stand firm on the belief that FFVII was the last thing Square made of any signifigance, but the hardcore RPGer in me will argue that among RPG's, the FF series is a safe bet, nay, a sure thing when it comes to RPG greatness. I'll admit there were duds in the mix; specifically 8 and 9, but that's completely forgiveable considering the FF series has taken things from scratch each and every time, aside from some cameos. No two games act/look/play alike. Even the one direct "sequel" in the series, FFX-2, stands alone in gameplay style and character maturation. Sure beats the old resident evil/god of war/mario copy paste you get with every new title.
Please don't jump on the "Final Fantasy died after FFVII" bandwagon without at least having played the games!

klaypeeple:
Damn, I was hoping to be inb4 the obligatory "FFVII was the last great offering" praise, but alas, I had stuff to do today.
Yes, Squeenix has been on the downhill trot, but so has every thing in video games. It's all about the glitzy glam of the visuals than about the story. My point though, is that while I've watched Samus, Mario, Link, Sonic, and Megaman slip into (and in many cases, well beyond) mediocrity, the one thing I can stand tall and proud to exclaim is that the Final Fantasy franchise is still alive.
The average video gamer will stand firm on the belief that FFVII was the last thing Square made of any signifigance, but the hardcore RPGer in me will argue that among RPG's, the FF series is a safe bet, nay, a sure thing when it comes to RPG greatness. I'll admit there were duds in the mix; specifically 8 and 9, but that's completely forgiveable considering the FF series has taken things from scratch each and every time, aside from some cameos. No two games act/look/play alike. Even the one direct "sequel" in the series, FFX-2, stands alone in gameplay style and character maturation. Sure beats the old resident evil/god of war/mario copy paste you get with every new title.
Please don't jump on the "Final Fantasy died after FFVII" bandwagon without at least having played the games!

I don't think that Final Fantasy died after FFVII. I think it died when FFXI came out and while I liked FFT and FFVIII, (I actually think FFT was better then FFVII.) FFVIII was when the franchise started to drop off and FFIX was when it went into a full blown coma. FFXII was not enough to save the franchise from it's awful attempt at the MMO market. So unless FFXIII is freaking ambrosia, I'm gonna declare the series done.

Excellent topic LucanDesmond. I agree, even though I am a Nintendo fan, the ONLY games from Nintendo are the usual Mario,Metroid,Zelda,Kirby,etc. I mostly play my X360. Even though I'm not a Sony fan, The PS3 is trying SOOOO hard to be both a Wii and a 360 back then. Remember the Sixaxis and Lair? And they no longer have JRPGs anymore. Just shooters. Since they failed with the Sixaxis and know focus on the shooters, its trying to be like the Xbox 360 and not what it used to be. And the HOME, well...yea

klaypeeple:
Damn, I was hoping to be inb4 the obligatory "FFVII was the last great offering" praise, but alas, I had stuff to do today.
Yes, Squeenix has been on the downhill trot, but so has every thing in video games. It's all about the glitzy glam of the visuals than about the story. My point though, is that while I've watched Samus, Mario, Link, Sonic, and Megaman slip into (and in many cases, well beyond) mediocrity, the one thing I can stand tall and proud to exclaim is that the Final Fantasy franchise is still alive.
The average video gamer will stand firm on the belief that FFVII was the last thing Square made of any signifigance, but the hardcore RPGer in me will argue that among RPG's, the FF series is a safe bet, nay, a sure thing when it comes to RPG greatness. I'll admit there were duds in the mix; specifically 8 and 9, but that's completely forgiveable considering the FF series has taken things from scratch each and every time, aside from some cameos. No two games act/look/play alike. Even the one direct "sequel" in the series, FFX-2, stands alone in gameplay style and character maturation. Sure beats the old resident evil/god of war/mario copy paste you get with every new title.
Please don't jump on the "Final Fantasy died after FFVII" bandwagon without at least having played the games!

Well if you like the FF series thats fine. But I really think that it started to go downhil after 6. Sure 7 was good, but I think 6 was better. Then 8 was even further down the hill, 9 pretty much hit rock bottom. 10 took half a step up from rock bottom and then made a Charlie's Angels meet The Powerpuff Girls sequel and dug out a NEW rock bottom. 11 Doesn't count, it's an MMO and a totally different kind of game that shouldn't have been given a number. 12 was bad, they tried to reinvent the battle system again and instead wound up with a mess that couldn't decide if it was an action game or an RPG. Plus the story was EVEN MORE ridiculous and that characters were EVEN MORE feminine and/or slutty. 13 looks like it's going to follow the trend.

IMO FF is dead.

PS. Oh and I did play them all. I didn't FINISH 12, but I did play it.

I don't know SEGA does seem to have a healthy group of developers with games like Valkirye chronicles, Madworld, The conduit. Team Sonic may be producing average games with their mascot(like like Unleashed for the wii despite the sterotype anime storyline) but the rest have some health underlooked games that should get some attention because the developers for those games are producing games that everyone would like to play or at the least try it.

LucanDesmond:

klaypeeple:
Damn, I was hoping to be inb4 the obligatory "FFVII was the last great offering" praise, but alas, I had stuff to do today.
Yes, Squeenix has been on the downhill trot, but so has every thing in video games. It's all about the glitzy glam of the visuals than about the story. My point though, is that while I've watched Samus, Mario, Link, Sonic, and Megaman slip into (and in many cases, well beyond) mediocrity, the one thing I can stand tall and proud to exclaim is that the Final Fantasy franchise is still alive.
The average video gamer will stand firm on the belief that FFVII was the last thing Square made of any signifigance, but the hardcore RPGer in me will argue that among RPG's, the FF series is a safe bet, nay, a sure thing when it comes to RPG greatness. I'll admit there were duds in the mix; specifically 8 and 9, but that's completely forgiveable considering the FF series has taken things from scratch each and every time, aside from some cameos. No two games act/look/play alike. Even the one direct "sequel" in the series, FFX-2, stands alone in gameplay style and character maturation. Sure beats the old resident evil/god of war/mario copy paste you get with every new title.
Please don't jump on the "Final Fantasy died after FFVII" bandwagon without at least having played the games!

Well if you like the FF series thats fine. But I really think that it started to go downhil after 6. Sure 7 was good, but I think 6 was better. Then 8 was even further down the hill, 9 pretty much hit rock bottom. 10 took half a step up from rock bottom and then made a Charlie's Angels meet The Powerpuff Girls sequel and dug out a NEW rock bottom. 11 Doesn't count, it's an MMO and a totally different kind of game that shouldn't have been given a number. 12 was bad, they tried to reinvent the battle system again and instead wound up with a mess that couldn't decide if it was an action game or an RPG. Plus the story was EVEN MORE ridiculous and that characters were EVEN MORE feminine and/or slutty. 13 looks like it's going to follow the trend.

IMO FF is dead.

PS. Oh and I did play them all. I didn't FINISH 12, but I did play it.

See I would disagree with your take on 9. If anything the protagonist was far more interesting than cloud, the mechanics were more the spiritual successors to 6 and a return to form, and the darker overall themes set in the relatively light backdrop gave it the fairy tale feel that sets it apart. Nine managed to bring back themes that were abandoned after the games left the SNES but at the same time hold on to a stand alone setting and theme that made you care about the characters again. It was no 'tales of symphonia' but I would actually put it above 7 in my own personal FF list. Six is still my favorite though.

But I agree that 10 and 11 kind of tapered off a bit too hard. Have not gotten to try 12 but I am willing to give 13 a chance.

Disclaimer: By the time I read this, I had already watched the new ZP, read through the original post, then had to take a break to run an errand, so I'm sure there are lots of folks who have replied by now. So just for the record, I'm responding to the OP.

Your cynicism is noted and I have to say that it's a little unfair. Nintendo has every right to try and make money; I mean, that's what a company is, right? If they do things that seem like they're taking advantage of a demographic, so be it; I'm personally not surprised and never once thought better of them. Nintendo isn't anyone's child that dropped out of Ivy League to sell crack or something; treat them for what they are. : / It's okay to dislike their games, but why try to blame it on something that's expected?

I also think your hostility to Square is sort of the same way. Final Fantasy isn't the horrible monster that stole attention from those great games you listed. Final Fantasy grew up alongside these classics, not against them and they live on today: Chrono Trigger is still popular enough that it's having not one but TWO re-releases (FF Chronicles and the upcoming DS version), Xenogears lived on in its horribly mutated parallel universe version Xenosaga, and FF Tactics spawned two sequels, a flagship FF title, and a PSP re-release. Just because we aren't up to Chrono Trigger XIII is that so bad? :( Square seems to care about non-FF titles, but it's just dumb to abandon their flagship franchise to pursue what were originally pretty much side projects made by FF developers (or in FF Tactics' case, a rival to Ogre Battle).

I also think the opposite of your assessment for the DS and PSP titles; to me, they seem more like the "beating of the VERY DEAD Final Fantasy horse". I enjoyed the GBA re-releases and their classic flavor (with a few modern tweeks) and the chance to play the true-blue Final Fantasy 3 on the DS, but the PSP titles were pushing it in my book. Remember that they were part of the "anniversary" going on for the franchise, which to me comes across as at least a little pretentious.

I'd also re-assess my RPGs if I were you. Final Fantasy isn't the only franchise to have "frequently emotionally distressed" (I don't use the "e" word, some of us realize it's a music genre, not a mental state) characters in ridiculous storylines. If you ask me, it's a staple of the genre with some rare exceptions. : / In fact, aren't all video game plots kind of ridiculous in the end?

I can't comment on the PS3 since I don't have one, but I'm in the same boat where all I play are Xbox 360 and PC games these days. The last good game I played by a company that happened to be based in Japan was Tales of Vesperia; I normally cringe at anime-style games, but with its epic story, dynamic and likable characters, and frantic battle system I was addicted all the way to the end credits. I also enjoyed Megaman 9 a lot. :)

Getting to the main topic at hand...

I will say that you might be right about Japanese-originating games going downhill a bit outside of their country and I blame it on the lack of variety in the market. Nipponichi and Atlas seem to be trying, but they only seem to pick games that have a niche following or a fanciful anime aesthetic. As for mainstream Japanese games, they seem fond of experimenting and making things fancier as Nintendo and Square-Enix demonstrate. I don't hold it against them to flex graphic muscle, but I cringe when trailers and commercials are just cut-scenes and no gameplay.

However, it might be that tastes and interests change in time. You sound like you're more interested in companies that release a healthy deal of information to go with their games, or at least games that were made by companies that have a different theory to their development. I say that game design is becoming dynamic and varied as more companies join the market and now that gamers have a choice in the matter, they're feeling out what they like and don't like in a game.

TL;DR:
Japanese games aren't going down hill, gamers are just realizing they have other choices.

Well I have to say that there is one Japanese franchise I still enjoy, anyone who makes a DB/DBZ/GT game, Just kidding, the real one is whoever makes the Tales games(not including tales of symphonia 2). Also I don't know if anyone has noticed the true crap that the wii has, wii fit for example, a game to get kids to excersise, i won't play it because it has nothing i want in it, other games like hannah montana, you might as well just rename the wii and call it Fisher Price Fun Box

For the most part, some game developers have fooled themselves into believing that arhcaic gaming conventions are actually defining aspects of a genre. This causes a technological stagnation and a gameplay perspective that falls out of step with modern gamers.

For example, there are still games to this day who just recreate palette swapped enemies to symbolize more difficult iterations of those enemies. However, this practice was originally done in order to save memory but now its because people are lazy and they think that gamers are fine with it.

I understand your point ExistentialCrisis. I have to disagree with you on one big point however. Square focusing on FF too much.

ExistentialCrisis:

I also think your hostility to Square is sort of the same way. Final Fantasy isn't the horrible monster that stole attention from those great games you listed. Final Fantasy grew up alongside these classics, not against them and they live on today: Chrono Trigger is still popular enough that it's having not one but TWO re-releases (FF Chronicles and the upcoming DS version), Xenogears lived on in its horribly mutated parallel universe version Xenosaga, and FF Tactics spawned two sequels, a flagship FF title, and a PSP re-release. Just because we aren't up to Chrono Trigger XIII is that so bad? :( Square seems to care about non-FF titles, but it's just dumb to abandon their flagship franchise to pursue what were originally pretty much side projects made by FF developers (or in FF Tactics' case, a rival to Ogre Battle).

Especially that line about Xenogears and Xenosaga. Xenosaga, if you hadn't noticed was published by Namco, not Square. The reason behind this being that the team of people that made Xenogears during their time with Square wanted to keep making Xeno games, but their bosses said no. They were told that they would be working on the next FF. They were so upset that they left Square and formed Monolith Soft. After that they began development on Xenosaga, but were forced to keep the story different enough from Xenogears because Square owned the copyrights to that story. So thats why the Xenosaga games were a) not made by Square and b) had a different (and not nearly as good) storyline.

So thats my main reference regarding the "FF take priority over ALL" argument.

So Jrpgs are in the same situation as FPS games? Honestly both genres are effectively dead save for a few bright spots here and there. I would say that it is Squareenix rather than Jrpgs that are the problem here, unlike FPS which is truly a genre problem. The Jrpg problem started a while ago, it's my suspicion that it has alot to do with Squareenix being the biggest peddler of Jrpgs to the Western world. What we are seeing now is a power shift away from Square, and by extension Final Fantasy.

Sonic doesn't work in 3D, or at least they have not found a way to make it work yet. It would be best if Sega just put sonic to bed.

................SEGA are Japanese? The way they fucked everything up I thought they were being run by Americans.

(Apologies to Americans everywhere).

I will forever be one of the sad few staring at the horizon and waiting for Nintendo to be great again...

So in other words; I'm their bitch.

LucanDesmond:
So thats why the Xenosaga games were a) not made by Square and b) had a different (and not nearly as good) storyline.
.

Except, of course, Xenogears was shit to begin with. It's leaden, plodding and as predictable as one would expect from the result of a bunch of games developers writing with one hand and rubbing copies of Neon Genesis Evangelion against their crotch with the other. The dialogue is awful (and I am reliably informed this is not simply an artefact of translation, it's that bad in Japanese as well), it's utterly reliant on vague exposition from characters you don't meet ever because they die half a world away from you and never actually affect you in any significant way, and then halfway through the game undergoes spontaneous existence failure and you're left looking at screens and screens of that direly written Evangelion fanfiction scrolling past at the unchangeable rate of one word per minute for about the next five goddamn hours interspersed with boss battles that are either punishingly difficult (Deus) or stupidly easy for the sake of a cameo (the one where the Macross 7 shows up to fight for you for one battle).

theres still great stuff comming out of Japan, like Valkyria Chronicles (which, by the way, is made by that infamous company who consistently tries to breath new life into the long-dead blue hedgehog)

GloatingSwine:

LucanDesmond:
So thats why the Xenosaga games were a) not made by Square and b) had a different (and not nearly as good) storyline.
.

Except, of course, Xenogears was shit to begin with. It's leaden, plodding and as predictable as one would expect from the result of a bunch of games developers writing with one hand and rubbing copies of Neon Genesis Evangelion against their crotch with the other. The dialogue is awful (and I am reliably informed this is not simply an artefact of translation, it's that bad in Japanese as well), it's utterly reliant on vague exposition from characters you don't meet ever because they die half a world away from you and never actually affect you in any significant way, and then halfway through the game undergoes spontaneous existence failure and you're left looking at screens and screens of that direly written Evangelion fanfiction scrolling past at the unchangeable rate of one word per minute for about the next five goddamn hours interspersed with boss battles that are either punishingly difficult (Deus) or stupidly easy for the sake of a cameo (the one where the Macross 7 shows up to fight for you for one battle).

Wow, somebody didn't like Xenogears. Fair enough. My point in the OP however was that, I believe anyway, that Xenogears COULD have seen sequels and/or prequels if the bigwigs at Square had spent time and money on anything other than Final Fantasy. And that is something that they desperately need to do.

SecretTacoNinja:
................SEGA are Japanese? The way they fucked everything up I thought they were being run by Americans.

(Apologies to Americans everywhere).

I will forever be one of the sad few staring at the horizon and waiting for Nintendo to be great again...

So in other words; I'm their bitch.

None taken. Americans tend to fuck up EVERYTHING (I recommend you watch Team American World Police). But it's mostly Square-Enix and Sony that are going downhill.

As a 25 year gamer, I'm left thinking anyone who classifies games by their ethnicity is inadvertently demonstrating a kind of racism. Games are games, nationality hardly matters, and whether you want a JRPG-style command box or a point and click interface is just a difference in design decision.

Japan is not a race. Its more like nationalism

sorry double post

Don't you mean Team Sonic, not Sega?

Capcom is still cool.