Topic Index
Not Enough to do in Fallout 3

Username:Password:
Log In
 (Pages: 1, 2, 3)
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4233
Joined: 27 Apr 2008

Powerhelix:

Edit: When I say I have done everything, I don't mean I have Opened Every Lock, Hacked Every Computer, Or done every quest ending. But I have done each quest once, as I cannot bring myself to play through again.

Play it again, make new characters that are drastically different from your first one. Also, some of the quest endings are very different and interesting. Explore some more buildings and forts, oh wait-

smallharmlesskitten:
Your playing it wrong?

This
I love Fallout 3, I would marry it if I could. There is just so much to do in my opinion, but you have to be in the right mindset to play it, or else it's not nearly as good. I realized that once I stopped comparing it to Oblivion and just let it be it's own game, I enjoyed it so much more then I did at first.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1151
Joined: 7 Dec 2008

I liked Oblivion more in most aspects. I hope Bethesda makes a new Elder Scrolls now.

Copy Clerk
Posts: 52
Joined: 19 Dec 2008

CoverYourHead:
I liked Oblivion more in most aspects. I hope Bethesda makes a new Elder Scrolls now.

I read that they are making one for release in 2010

Press Junketeer
Posts: 458
Joined: 3 Jan 2009

Also Oblivion didnt have that scene were its a perfect world and you have to kill every living soul that you meet in that cul de sac

Copy Clerk
Posts: 52
Joined: 19 Dec 2008

I have EVERY weapon, that includes the Alien gun... And I have discovered EVERY location, and I found Dogmeat at the Junkyard

Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 518
Joined: 15 Dec 2007

It took me 6 weeks to finish the game doing every quest. The replay value does suffer a bit unless you are trying to get some random encounters (like uncle leon lol). I would say that it is better than oblivion but it has a lot of clutter.

Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 846
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

You're right! In Oblivion I still haven't beaten every side mission, but in Fallout 3, I hit the level cap and beat every mission in a short amount of time. (Compared to Oblivion) Although the F3 side missions were better quality, there just weren't enough of them.

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 4233
Joined: 27 Apr 2008

Xiado:
You're right! In Oblivion I still haven't beaten every side mission, but in Fallout 3, I hit the level cap and beat every mission in a short amount of time. (Compared to Oblivion) Although the F3 side missions were better quality, there just weren't enough of them.

that's how I feel about it. Oblivion's side quests just weren't as creative as some of Fallout 3's.

Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 846
Joined: 5 Jul 2008

Powerhelix:

CoverYourHead:
I liked Oblivion more in most aspects. I hope Bethesda makes a new Elder Scrolls now.

I read that they are making one for release in 2010

*eyebrow raises quizzically*
In another year or so? It took them quite a while to get Oblivion out after Morrowind, and they have been working on Fallout 3 recently.
I honestly doubt it will come out that fast.

Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

I think that you can complain all you want about oblivion's lack of creativity but the core gameplay was strong enough that it made up for it. With fallout, though, I didn't feel like the creativity made up for the fact that all you had to do was use VATS over and over and over again.

BANNED
Posts: 2340
Joined: 27 May 2008

Murder everyone? I mean everyone (cept children)

User was banned for: [NEW SCREENIES]Prototype [HOLY SHIT]. (Permanent)
News Room Contributor
Posts: 3899
Joined: 21 Feb 2008

While I'm loathe to say that someone is playing a game 'wrong', blasting through the whole thing in a single day, which I'm not entirely sure is possible, doesn't seem like the best way of doing it.

I'm almost afraid to ask what you make of games like Bioshock or Call of Duty 4, which aren't open world at all.

Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

I played Bioshock for a few months and I played COD for even longer. It's not that i don't appreciate games, it's just that FO3 could've been so much more

News Room Contributor
Posts: 3899
Joined: 21 Feb 2008

beastman227:
I played Bioshock for a few months and I played COD for even longer. It's not that i don't appreciate games, it's just that FO3 could've been so much more

How? I'm not saying I think it's perfect, but I'm curious to know how you think it could be improved.

Senior Editor
Posts: 2297
Joined: 9 Jan 2007

Powerhelix:
Ok... I dont think anyone will agree with me on this, but I dont think there was enough to do in the game.
I have done, what I believe to be, every quest in the game. I have discovered evey location in the game, I have every weapon, and almost every achevement. The achevements I dont have require me to replay the game.
The game is really short, I did everything in a day of playing. Good and Evil are clearly defined. And there aren't enough quests and real decisions in the game to warrent my replaying the game.
The number of enemies in the game is rather small. The number of weapon variations in the game are even smaller. You cant go into most buildings either.
The game seems almost half done. Oblivion tops it, in my opinion, hands down. There was a lot more to do in it, and it has a lot higher replay value to me.
I'm just curious if anyone agrees with me.

Edit: I would like to point out I did say ALMOST all the achevements, the Karma ones being the ones Excluded... I would also like to say I played for a day, I.E. I woke up in the morining, sat my ass down and didnt get up till about the time I woke up the day previous.

Edit: When I say I have done everything, I don't mean I have Opened Every Lock, Hacked Every Computer, Or done every quest ending. But I have done each quest once, as I cannot bring myself to play through again.

Edit... Again: I am also aware that quest endings differ from eachother quite a bit, but the fact still remains that I dont have enough reason to care about the game, or anything in it, to actually warrent my going back and playing it when I can just as easily go on youtube and see a video of the other endings...

I'm not about to argue that there is or isn't enough to do in the game - that's really a matter of opinion - but I simply don't believe that you did every single quest in the game in just one day. Sorry, but I think you're either using hyperbole to make your point or just plain fibbing.

That said, I too prefer Oblivion to Fallout. Though I'm very much enjoying the time I'm spending with Fallout at the moment, I very much doubt I'll play through it a second time. I think the main quest is superior to that of Oblivions (honestly, the Oblivion gates were just such a snore), but I couldn't care much less about the people who live in the Capital Wasteland.

Anonymous Source
Posts: 1
Joined: 5 Jan 2009

Yes, I registered to post this. No I'm not OP. Nichtsdestoweniger, I'm going to have to agree with OP. I played Fallout 3 for about 48 hours, subtracting a good 20 for sleep, food, and a class or two (this was last Halloween. I skipped Franklin St. for F3. Damn.) and I got just about every achievement, found damn near everything, (when I went to sleep, all I had left was the last little push in the Main Quest), and had rather thoroughly enjoyed myself. But, as much fun as the game was, it was, indeed, rather short.

Ok, I started another character, ignored sane skill/perk choices for cool sounding ones (Child at Heart + Little Lamplight = the most disappointing 10 minutes of November, including the trip there), and had myself a merry 150 (and still going) hours. Further, I'm all kinds of excited about Bethesda's secondary development team, the modding community (the folks who finish their games for them...).

But, as for the game Beth shipped, and the way I played it at first (y'know, selecting perks I thought would be useful, and not wasting time where I figured my character wouldn't), it was shamefully short, pointlessly easy, and worthy only because of how entertained I was during what little time I spent in D.C.

BANNED
Posts: 1266
Joined: 19 Dec 2008

Yeah the game is half done. As you said you cant enter most of the buildings and the ones you can are freaking copy/pasted. I just cant wait till a decent amount of user mods gets released for it.

User was banned for: Soldier rushes to defend post in pink boxers. (Permanent)
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2863
Joined: 14 Jun 2008

nilcypher:

beastman227:
I played Bioshock for a few months and I played COD for even longer. It's not that i don't appreciate games, it's just that FO3 could've been so much more

How? I'm not saying I think it's perfect, but I'm curious to know how you think it could be improved.

Well I know you asked him but I have a few ideas...
More enemy varieties. Faster enemy respawn time. More sidequests. Higher Difficulty curve. More side quests Increased level cap.
And a better ending but everyone bitches about that one.

Better

Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

1) More quests: 16 Major quests isn't enough to give a game like FO3 the longevity it needs. 2) Better aiming system: sure, VATS is fun but it takes all the skill out of the game. That being said, there's no alternative because you can't aim for shit at a distance with the ridiculous crosshairs.
3) More control over your character: Sure, you can be a boy or a girl; black, white, etc... but I want to be a ghoul or enclave or raider.
That's how I think it could be improved

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2142
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

It's been said; rushed out. It can't grip me, partially because I've played Oblivion: tES a fair amount, but not mainly. Fallout 2 is the best game ever made, and this is like its antithesis in thorough game design. I'm really glad the voice acting was good, at least. I loathe the idea of the series being disgraced by a bad game.

News Room Contributor
Posts: 3899
Joined: 21 Feb 2008

Higurashi:
Fallout 2 is the best game ever made, and this is like its antithesis in thorough game design.

Care to expand on that point?

Beat Writer
Posts: 210
Joined: 18 Mar 2008

sigh.. I have to agree with the OP, because I did all the quest, and hit up all the locations barring some train stations and I hit around 25 hours. Granted I have spent about a 100 hours on the game, once you know where everything is you can get through side quest very quickly. Also now I have a speed mod installed, probably should mention that.

BANNED
Posts: 1891
Joined: 26 Mar 2008

I think i've clocked up +50 hours and i'm on my second playthrough. I'm still finding new things so maybe people are rushing the game to much.

And with all the new mods coming out daily, the fun never seems to end.

User was banned for: Poll: Round 4 - North: (1) Turbine vs (2) Valve. (Permanent)
Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1769
Joined: 27 Dec 2008

harhol:
I agree with you that the game seems half done. It was rushed out, certainly.

I played it, found it mildly entertaining, finished it and moved on. There are much better games out there.

I agree it was rushed
they should have followed the Duke Nukem Developers path and gave it another year to perfect it.

Pulitzer Laureate
Posts: 847
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

Characters like Mr Burke and Tenpenny made me LOVE that game.

Spent about 50+ hours playing that game, only the ending disappointed me, nothing else.

I found the quests shorter than Oblivion, but a whole lot more fulfilling.

My two cents,

Joe

Infamous Scribbler
Posts: 629
Joined: 2 Nov 2008

I really liked Fallout 3. I have every achievement in it, and in only one playthrough(very nice, easy exploit to get the Karma achievements). I don't have all the weapons yet, as in the special ones, but I've played the crap out of it. I truly love the game, though I agree there's not that much to do and not that much that would bring me to play it again. I'm counting on the DLC to come out and give me a bit more fun.

Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

how do you have all the achievements without all the special weapons?

Beat Writer
Posts: 127
Joined: 6 Aug 2008

Alright, I've read liek 16 posts and think I can formulate a valid opinion.

I think you're an achievement hounder because if you want to play a game for the sake of playing a fucking game you would have found it more enthralling as oppossed to half done. How do I know this because I spent the entire first of the game out the vault I went the wrong fuckign way for half an hour and did some questing. If you paly it casually it's very good I think the game is good and I think the storyline is as good as any game that's come out so far though I think Half Life 2 was a great game. I feel now that fallout 3 is the best game I've played. I just bought oblivion but haven't played it.

To sum up : If you play the game for the sake of atmosphere and gameplay it's a definite shot to play and it's definetly the best fallout without saying. But to say it's half done is absoloutley prepostorous. There's so much you can do. And as for the game being short. Just try actually walking around instead of Pip-Boy Teleporting.

Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

MattKirby:
Alright, I've read liek 16 posts and think I can formulate a valid opinion.

I think you're an achievement hounder because if you want to play a game for the sake of playing a fucking game you would have found it more enthralling as oppossed to half done. How do I know this because I spent the entire first of the game out the vault I went the wrong fuckign way for half an hour and did some questing. If you paly it casually it's very good I think the game is good and I think the storyline is as good as any game that's come out so far though I think Half Life 2 was a great game. I feel now that fallout 3 is the best game I've played. I just bought oblivion but haven't played it.

To sum up : If you play the game for the sake of atmosphere and gameplay it's a definite shot to play and it's definetly the best fallout without saying. But to say it's half done is absoloutley prepostorous. There's so much you can do. And as for the game being short. Just try actually walking around instead of Pip-Boy Teleporting.

I played the game for the sake of "playing a fucking game" and I didn't like it. How does that make me an achievement whore?

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1032
Joined: 28 Jul 2008

How can ANYONE call the ending bad?!? It was like the Iron Giant going ramage on those Enclave bastards. The Iron Giant with a sense of HUMOR! Sure it sucks hard that you can't keep playing, even if you send her in, but just go back to a previous save...

Fallout 3 made up for the dissapointment of 2008, Far Cry 2.

"War, war never changes..."

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 1769
Joined: 27 Dec 2008

beastman227:
how do you have all the achievements without all the special weapons?

... you dont want to know

It involves moving your computer into the bathroom and at the same time moving in a freezer stacked with hot pockets and a microwave in the corner

Gone Gonzo
Posts: 2142
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

nilcypher:

Higurashi:
Fallout 2 is the best game ever made, and this is like its antithesis in thorough game design.

Care to expand on that point?

Certainly. The most obvious thing are the bugs, that appear in large numbers. The second painful realisation are the shallow characters and unimaginative areas. The story is pushed on with effort, but truly fades before other things to do. The intro is probably what I liked the most. The variety of weapons and armour is crippled down to a buzz, and there is little enjoyment in exploring the generic map with the obvious and predictable locations.
Despite all this, I remain at the point of saying it's not a bad game, but it reminds me a bit of Bioshock; trying to be more than it is, and ends up being shallow because it throws in so many things, few remain more than a passing memory. It feels slightly incoherent, but logical in its effort that ends up as a banality.
Fallout 2 purveyed the feeling of clear structure, and was interesting and deeper in every aspect 3 is not. No wonder though; it was rushed.
I tremble with righteous agitation at the thought of it.

Beat Writer
Posts: 127
Joined: 6 Aug 2008

beastman227:

MattKirby:
Alright, I've read liek 16 posts and think I can formulate a valid opinion.

I think you're an achievement hounder because if you want to play a game for the sake of playing a fucking game you would have found it more enthralling as oppossed to half done. How do I know this because I spent the entire first of the game out the vault I went the wrong fuckign way for half an hour and did some questing. If you paly it casually it's very good I think the game is good and I think the storyline is as good as any game that's come out so far though I think Half Life 2 was a great game. I feel now that fallout 3 is the best game I've played. I just bought oblivion but haven't played it.

To sum up : If you play the game for the sake of atmosphere and gameplay it's a definite shot to play and it's definetly the best fallout without saying. But to say it's half done is absoloutley prepostorous. There's so much you can do. And as for the game being short. Just try actually walking around instead of Pip-Boy Teleporting.

I played the game for the sake of "playing a fucking game" and I didn't like it. How does that make me an achievement whore?

not neccesarily who I was talking about, but then again you're not one of the people whos' post I read or I did and you obviously don't like games with depth.

But, you obviously don't care to elaborate because of your pathetic one sentence retort that really doesn't seem to do anything but cause a problem. I suppose you want me to give you a gold star that says "I play games because I enjoy them and still find quality ones with high budgets lacking, and as such I dislike them !"

BANNED
Posts: 1891
Joined: 26 Mar 2008

Slayer_2:
How can ANYONE call the ending bad?!? It was like the Iron Giant going ramage on those Enclave bastards. The Iron Giant with a sense of HUMOR! Sure it sucks hard that you can't keep playing, even if you send her in, but just go back to a previous save...

Yes, the final is amazing but... the ending is a complete kick in the balls and done so in a very lazy manner.

User was banned for: Poll: Round 4 - North: (1) Turbine vs (2) Valve. (Permanent)
Paperboy
Posts: 14
Joined: 3 Aug 2008

not neccesarily who I was talking about, but then again you're not one of the people whos' post I read or I did and you obviously don't like games with depth.

But, you obviously don't care to elaborate because of your pathetic one sentence retort that really doesn't seem to do anything but cause a problem. I suppose you want me to give you a gold star that says "I play games because I enjoy them and still find quality ones with high budgets lacking, and as such I dislike them !"

So because I played the game and didn't like it I CLEARLY hate big-budget games? I just don't like big-budget games that have horrible aim systems, 16 quests, limited character creation, and almost no character development.

 (Pages: 1, 2, 3)
Topic Index

Reply to Thread

You must be logged in to post.
Username:  
Password:  
  

Not registered? Sign up for a free account!

Forum Jump: