Did you know?

We've added more customization tools to make your reading experience more personal. You can now adjust the background color, font and font size for this page and any other content page by hovering over the image below.Log in to have your settings saved for future visits.
 
 
News

Far Cry 2 DRM Confirmed

| 15 Oct 2008 19:39
image

It's not an EA game, but Ubisoft has confirmed that Far Cry 2 is going to employ some very EA-like anti-piracy measures.

A post on the official Far Cry 2 forum at Ubisoft (via Blue's) by forum manager "bukowski113" says the upcoming FPS will employ SecuROM in a system almost identical to recent EA releases, limiting users to five activations each on three separate PCs. Unlike previous games incorporating SecuROM, however, uninstalling Far Cry 2 will automatically revoke an activation, meaning that as long as owners properly uninstall the game when they're finished with it, they'll be able to install it an unlimited number of times on three systems.

The message also says the revoke system will allow gamers to upgrade their systems as many times as they want, presumably by uninstalling the game before performing an upgrade, and also promises that "additional activations can be provided" if necessary. "Ubisoft is committed to the long term support of our games," the forum manager wrote. "You'll always be able to play Far Cry 2."

Predictably, discussion about the use of SecuROM is running hot and heavy, although the presence of automatic revokes and vocal commitment to the long-term viability of the game seems to have tempered the vitriol somewhat. But it's still something of an odd choice: Anti-DRM sentiments are running at an all-time high, the recent Spore experience has proven that it does virtually nothing to stop piracy and the Far Cry franchise isn't nearly enough of a mainstream heavyweight that it can shrug off a concentrated negative reaction among core gamers.

RELATED CONTENT
ANDY CHALK | 2 Dec 2008 22:00
ROB ZACNY | 17 Feb 2009 14:01
ERIN HOFFMAN | 7 Oct 2008 12:25
MICHAEL SHANKS | 11 Jun 2009 17:00

Comments on