Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Escapist Publisher Says Banning Games Is Slippery Slope

This article is over 14 years old and may contain outdated information
image

If we ban game sales to minors simply because videogames are interactive, then bans of TV shows like American Idol or websites like Wikipedia can follow.

The First Amendment protects all forms of media from censorship based on content, CEO and Publisher of The Escapist, Alexander Macris, said in an op-ed piece printed in Raleigh’s News Observer. The California state law that will be under review of the Supreme Court on November 2 has been struck down by all previous courts because the proof that playing violent videogames causes violent behavior was not compelling enough for the judges. But Macris argues that beyond the violence question, subjecting videogames to a different standard than other media is dangerous.

“The 9th Circuit [Court of Appeals] rejected the state’s attempts to link games and real-world violence because the argument was ‘based on correlation, not evidence of causation’ and because expert conclusions were drawn using ‘significant, admitted flaws in methodology,'” Macris writes. “There is no consensus of scientific evidence showing that games are harmful to children.”

Macris points out that “interactivity” is everywhere, which is a core value of the The Escapist. To regulate interactive media more stringently than passive entertainment is wrong, as Macris writes, “Videogames are merely the spearhead of an interactive revolution that is transforming our world. Interactivity is coming to us everywhere – on the websites that we visit, the television we watch, even the radio stations we listen to. American Idol is interactive content. So is the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.”

If the Supreme Court upholds the California law, then the precedent is set to limit the sale of all interactive media. “The same reasoning that lets a state regulate a violent video game would also give the government power to control who can access Wikipedia or a TV show that invites its audience to vote online,” Macris writes.

“Allowing regulation for interactive media will invite censorship into our lives.”

And that is a scary thought.

Source: News Observer

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy