Directed by Colin Trevorrow. Produced by Frank Marshall and Patrick Crowley. Written by Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Derek Connolly, and Colin Trevorrow. Release date: June 12, 2015.
Jurassic World feels like the first true sequel – in terms of plot and spirit – to 1993’s Jurassic Park. While there were two sequels between these films, they felt like cheap imitations that were darker, less enjoyable, and the exact types of cynical cash-grabs against which audiences nowadays rally. Jurassic World, on the other hand, comes to us as a thrill-ride of a movie, complete with all of the laughs and awes that we’ve come to expect from the franchise – assuming Jurassic Park was the only installment that we’ve seen.
Set 22 years after Jurassic Park – and more or less ignoring any and all events that happened in the meantime – InGen, the company that brought dinosaurs back to life, has once again attempted to open a dinosaur-themed amusement park. The difference this time is that it’s been a success. Before Jurassic World even begins, the titular park has already been running for several years. Owned by Simon Masrani (Irrfan Khan), who has taken over for John Hammond, and run by Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), the park has seen large profits and has been far safer than anyone who saw the original film could have imagined.
However, Jurassic World – both the movie and the park, actually – knows that its audience isn’t going to be excited by “normal” dinosaurs anymore. We’ve seen them, and they’re passé. We’re too cynical an audience in 2015 to be in awe of things from the ’90s. So, the plot of the film sees the geneticists – led by the only returning character, Dr. Wu (B.D. Wong) – create an all-new dinosaur. It’s a hybrid, named Indominus rex, and it becomes the central villain. No bonus points for guessing that it escapes from its captivity and begins to terrorize the park and its guests.
Essentially, what we have here is a “bigger is better” approach to filmmaking – something that is probably the most common way filmmakers make action sequels. The threat is more dangerous, the stakes are higher, and the budget is larger. The characters are still pretty shallow, and the plot is minimal – even if Jurassic World has more moving parts – but gosh golly isn’t it fun to watch dinosaurs tear other dinosaurs and people to shreds?
Jurassic World feels like the first true sequel – in terms of plot and spirit – to 1993’s Jurassic Park.
The answer to that mostly rhetorical question is that, yes, it is indeed fun to watch dinosaurs do all of that. It’s been over 20 years since the Jurassic Park franchise has been fun, but Jurassic World finally gets that part right, which is the most important thing a series like this needs to do. While it would be almost impossible to replicate the sense of awe that the original film managed to achieve, Jurassic World gives us a couple of moments that come close. It also contains more than a few laughs, several cathartic scenes, and almost no points at which it feels slow or boring. This is a movie that runs for more than two hours but feels like it flies by in an instant.
Jurassic World‘s action is incredibly, and surprisingly violent and bloody given its PG-13 rating. The director is Colin Trevorrow, who had only made one previous feature-length film – the very solid Safety Not Guaranteed – and if there was one worry I had going in, it was that we hadn’t seen him direct action before, and therefore it could have gone spectacularly wrong. Thankfully, Trevorrow handles himself like an old pro, giving us thrilling sequences from start to finish.
Very few movies are perfect, and Jurassic World certainly isn’t one of them. The screenplay often flips character sides at the drop of a hat, and its obligatory romance develops way too fast for it to be even in the least bit believable. A subplot involving a military contractor played by Vincent D’Onofrio seemed to exist more for the film to make points about treating animals with respect and to pad the running time than to actually do a whole lot, and it’s as cheesy as they come – that’s not necessarily a bad thing, though. The child actors are annoying and Chris Pratt demonstrates far less charisma here than in Guardians of the Galaxy, which is unfortunate given that Jurassic World is his second big leading role. None of this is enough to make Jurassic World an unenjoyable film. Like I said, the time flies by.
While it probably never could have matched the awe-inspiring original film, we finally have a Jurassic Park sequel that feels like a proper Jurassic Park sequel – and one that is worthy of holding that title.
Bottom Line: Jurassic World is one thrilling ride. It’s fun, it’s exciting, it gives you several great moments, it has good acting, and solid special effects.
Recommendation: If you’re a big fan of Jurassic Park and wanted to see a proper follow-up, you’ve finally gotten your wish. But Jurassic World is a fun ride even for those who aren’t fans of the series. It’s well worth seeing.
[rating=3.5]
Published: Jun 12, 2015 04:00 pm