Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Once Upon a Deadpool

Once Upon a Deadpool

This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

Well, this certainly presents a unique set of challenges to a critic, doesnā€™t it? Not that thereā€™s anything particularly obtuse or difficult to wrap oneā€™s mind around when it comes to the Deadpool franchise. 2016ā€™s Deadpool established all the most bizarre things about the R-rated spin-off of the X-Men movies that exists in the same universe as those characters but is free to break the rules of continuity because itā€™s also a comedy making fun of those movies and the superhero genre in general. Its hero is a smartass contract killer in red and black ninja gear whose mutant healing powers make him impossible to kill. Said hero is also cognizant that heā€™s a fictional character inhabiting a comic book movie being played by actor Ryan Reynolds, but no one else in his world knows this. That strangeness carried over admirably into a sequel which (somehow?) landed nicely in the zone of being equal to or greater than its predecessor for most fans.

Recommended Videos

Rather, the difficulty comes from the fact that Once Upon a Deadpool is both a new film and also not precisely a new film, so there isnā€™t much of a modern template for reviewing it. A PG-13 re-issue of the very R-rated Deadpool 2 released jointly (and in no particular order) for the purposes of keeping 20th Century Fox Studios on the scoreboard for the holidays while post-production wizards try to hammer a watchable film out of the troubled X-Men: Dark Phoenix (and decide when or whether to release the currently in limbo New Mutants); raising money via partial ticket sales donations to the Fuck Cancer charity; and (one sort of has to assume) act as a proof of concept for the Merc with a Mouthā€™s ability to play passably nice with the family-friendly Marvel Cinematic Universe when Disney completes its acquisition of Fox and Deadpool plausibly becomes the only part of the X-Men movies anyone wants to even think about keeping.

To that end, while about 75-80% of Once Upon a Deadpool is in fact a ā€œsanitizedā€ (if still fairly violent and on the ā€œhardā€ edge of PG-13) version of Deadpool 2 ā€” a film which Iā€™ve already reviewed, albeit for a different outlet ā€” enough of it has been reworked through editing, including material thatā€™s been excised or altered being replaced by new scenes (most notably: The first of two opening massacres is gone; a new comedic exchange between Deadpool, Negasonic Teenage Warhead and Yukio has been added; and the plot is advanced via Deadpool and Fred Savage parodying the framing device from The Princess Bride) that it does indeed merit consideration as a film in its own right. Ergo, the question then becomes: What does that consideration look like? An opportunity to question whether or not Deadpool 2 ā€œholds upā€ in the first place? A simple cataloging of differences? Do you treat it merely as an alternate version of Deadpool 2 or does it rise to the level of being its own self-parody ā€” a commentary on the genre, itā€™s place therein, the nature of censorship, etc?

Taken as a work by itself (though, since it asks us to be, also in ā€œawarenessā€ of the original version) the good news for fans and/or the hypothetical target audience of under-18 viewers who couldnā€™t find an adult to get them into the R-rated version, is that Once Upon a Deadpool retains most of Deadpool 2ā€™s overall charm even as it loses most of its gore, nudity and naughty language. In fact, it almost ends up illustrating just how excessive its performative excess really is.

Even in ā€œneuteredā€ form, the seriesā€™ signature fusion of over-the-top ā€˜90s comics edginess, present-day action movie grit, and ā€œDuck Amuckā€-style cartoon logic feels very apart from any other superhero movie on the market. The main storyline (which mixes Deadpoolā€™s suicidal depression being impeded by his immortality with a Terminator-style time-traveling assassin riff that swaps out ā€œJudgment Dayā€ and Skynet with topical hot-buttons about school shootings and LGBTQ conversion therapy) is dark and biting enough to feel like an intentional rebuke to the idea that not only Deadpool himself but other R-rated Marvel fixtures like Daredevil, The Punisher or Jessica Jones canā€™t possibly fit into (or alongside) the ā€œrealā€ Marvel Cinematic Universe.

If for some reason youā€™d never seen a Deadpool movie before and decided to start with this one, you may not get most of the self-referential deconstructionist jokes, but youā€™ll definitely understand why people outside the obvious ā€œedgelord teens whoā€™ll laugh at anythingā€ demographic ended up liking Deadpool in spite of themselves: Thereā€™s a character under the caricature, and the surface-level ribbing of superhero tropes gives way to the occasional surprisingly cutting insight about the genreā€™s limitations and issues, as when Deadpool introduces his temporary X-Men teammates as ā€œA dated metaphor for racism from the ā€˜60s.ā€

It certainly says something, at least, that even without the contrast of the filthier gags the best running joke remains the utter delight Deadpool takes in how much it annoys NTW that her girlfriend Yukio doesnā€™t despise him ā€” though I imagine diehard X-Men fans will be more immediately amused by Savage excitedly rattling off a supporting characterā€™s absurdly complicated comic book backstory (assuming they can stop parsing whether or not a newly added joke about X-Force being ā€œjust something Fox made up to keep Josh Brolin employedā€ means that spin-off is indeed not happening anymore.)

On the other hand, Once Upon a Deadpoolā€™s self-censorship meta-gag feels like a missed opportunity. As noted earlier, the filmā€™s only been trimmed right up to the edge of a soft-R, mostly by swapping out scenes, removing blood and gore, and changing some lines. Considering how funny the ā€œself-bleepingā€ in the framing scenes is, even more fun could be had while also scoring some points regarding the absurdity of censorship standards overall by being even more draconian or pointing out standard industry hypocrisy. For instance, NTW and Yukio remain an out lesbian couple in this version, which is not always the case for LGBTQ references in genre films. Thatā€™s a ā€œcensor noteā€ itā€™d be decidedly in character for Deadpool to argue about.

In the end, the fact that more isnā€™t done with the ā€œremixingā€ premise means that Once Upon a Deadpool is a lesser curiosity (albeit adjacent to a good cause) rather than the true companion piece to Deadpool 2 it could have been. Only completists need to rush out and see this. But if every showing of that Spider-Man cartoon is sold-out at your theater this weekend thisā€™ll do, and at least theyā€™re going to give some of the money to a good cause.


The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Bob Chipman
Bob Chipman
Bob Chipman is a critic and author.