Image Credit: Bethesda
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Email Flambe: Jack Thompson vs. Take Two

This article is over 17 years old and may contain outdated information

Game Politics set the blogosphere on fire this morning when it posted an email exchange between famed anti-game attorney Jack Thompson and Take Two VP Gena Feist.

“Are you nuts?” wrote Jack Thompson in an email to Gena Feist, VP of Take Two Interactive, the company responsible for Rockstar Games and its current pariah, Manhunt 2. Previously in the exchange, Feist asked Thompson to, “Give it a break,” as videogame industry voyeurs everywhere drooled over the inside dirt.

The email exchange, uncovered by Game Politics, displays a tĆŖte-Ć -tĆŖte between two forces from different camps, battling it out over whether or not Thompson’s continued antagonism of Take Two violates a settlement between the two parties, whereby Thompson was forbidden to threaten the company with lawsuits, attempt to restrict sales of Take Two’s games or accuse Take Two of any misconduct with regard to its products.

Though it was thought that the settlement would effectively silence Thompson, this email exchange points to the contrary, and may in fact be a violation of the agreement, considering Thompson continues to contact the higher-ups at Take Two directly, when he is required by the settlement to make such contact via their attorneys. One poster, named “JackDon’tKnowJack” on Game Politics pointed out that such activity may be in direct contradiction to the settlement, and, “Jack” writes, “If that’s not violative [of their agreement], then it is, I believe, prohibited by the Florida Bar Rules of Conduct concerning attorney communications with attorney-represented parties.”

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy