Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Escapist logo header image

PS3 “Other OS” Removal May Violate Norwegian Law

This article is over 13 years old and may contain outdated information
image

The Norwegian Consumer Council says Sony’s removal of the “Other OS” option in the PlayStation 3 is a clear violation of the country’s Marketing Control Act and plans to file an official complaint with the Consumer Ombudsman.

A lot of PS3 owners got a bit of a nasty surprise back in March 2010 when Sony decided to remove the console’s “Other OS” option. Sony claimed that the removal of the option, which let users install alternate operating systems like Linux, was a necessary security measure, but that didn’t fly with a lot of owners, some of whom very predictably launched lawsuits.

But the Norwegian Consumer Council is taking matters a step further. “Sony claims a universal right to change or remove functionality from the gaming console,” said Thomas Nortvedt of the Norwegian Consumer Council. “In our opinion this is in clear violation of the Marketing Control Act, and not the least it’s a breach of trust between the consumer and Sony.”

The council received several complaints about the Other OS removal but Nortvedt said digital services aren’t covered by Norway’s current consumer laws. As a result, users are at the mercy of license agreements that deprive them of meaningful protection, demonstrating “just how little protection the consumer has in the digital age.”

“There needs to be a limit to what constitutes a reasonable change to products we buy. Terms of service that grant the manufacturer full access to literally downgrade the product or limit the functionality are unreasonable and in clear violation of the Marketing Control Act,” Nortvedt said. “When a company uses terms like updates or upgrades, it is reasonable to expect a significant improvement of the product and not the risk of being stuck with a lesser product.”

This is a case that bears watching. The Norwegian market on its own may not have enough heft to make Sony tremble but it could set a rather unwelcome precedent and inspire other nations to follow in its footsteps. If nothing else, a successful complaint could trigger similar actions from aggrieved consumer groups around the world, causing a legal and PR headache that Sony would probably much rather avoid.

Yet while Norway spearheads this particular battle over digital consumer rights, it remains mired in irrelevance when it comes to lions and tigers. Norway? More like Snoreway.

Source: ForbrukerrƄdet

Recommended Videos

The Escapist is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.Ā Learn more about our Affiliate Policy