The death of the fix-it-yourself generation Pages PREV 1 2 3 NEXT | |
I don't have a car, I walk and ride bikes. However, my husband has a car and thankfully knows enough about cars to do most fixes it seems. He also looks at his cousins cars, and if he can't help them, he has friends who can - that wont screw anyone over. But it's not just about cars, I know people who instead of sewing tears and just re-dying things with at-home kits, they just throw the whole thing away and buy new. Instead of using that old purse or bag that's still good for something else, they toss it out. Instead of keeping plastic containers to store things in or plastic bags for other uses, goes right into the bin. Spend, throw-away, spend, throw-away. Seems so wasteful. I'm a keep, fix, re-use, recycle kind of person. | |
I've worked on my own cars before I only usually take my vehicles to shops for warranty purposes or the lack of time. Dad was a self operator of a big rig, and he always worked on all of his own equipment. So guess who was taught how to work on cars, trucks, etc? | |
I wouldn't say do it yourself has died, just changed. It really depends on the item being fixed for most people. Sure, more people take their cars to the garage now to get fixed. But there are also more people who will fix their broken computer at home rather than taking it to the shop. | |
I'm fragile and I want to be able to feel like I'm self sufficient. | |
And this is exactly why I dislike Apple products. I'm not a moron. ...well, there's also the fact my most of my employment comes from servicing such devices (as well as stereos, general electronics, etc.)., but mostly the fact that I like being able to service my own products. And I'm especially annoyed that replaceable batteries are becoming a thing of the past. Are people really so clueless that they actually think sending their tablet in and paying an exorbitant service fee is a good thing?
Based on the last line, I'm assuming you're taking the piss. On the offhand you're not, though.... Nobody's saying that service fields should go away, as far as I can see. But the mandatory nature of service these days is kind of ridiculous. By way of analogue, farming may be boring, but what if I WANT to grow my own food? I don't, but a lot of people do. I want to be able to service my own stuff, and turn to the service sector when I don't want to or can't. Why is it a bad thing? I still depend on others, be it friends or professionals. | |
Well, learn farming then :) You know why I think people don't care about being self-sufficient? Because they want to be able to enjoy their lives. Back when everyone had to do everything themselves, there was no time left for pleasure. It was just work, sleep and occasional fucking. And church (but that was mandated by the ones in charge so it was almost like part of work). | |
In terms of my car: If it's not the battery that died, a tire that needs to be inflated, or a fuse that needs to be changed, it's going to a mechanic. But that isn't how I feel about everything. Like if something's wrong with my computer on the other hand, something I do find interesting, I'll fix it myself. | |
I used to own an '86 Buck Regal. The oil pan gasket was leaking so I figured it would be a simple fix. Twas not, as you have to literally pull the engine out to get the pan off. I got rid of that asshat. | |
The guy with the big red flag with the sickle&hammer on it in the local squat who told you that, was way off the mark. And I don't recognize anything about the rest of what you said. Products are of quality, most of them last forever and ever. One coffee machine once died on me because of a clear fabrication error and the shop didn't try to fix it, but only because it only employs sales personell who know fuckall about electronics. And that was a knock-down priced machine. The replacement lasted two years, which is more than I expected for something that cost a mere € 20 (comparing, the mid-range coffee machine is € 50-80). | |
I cannot but notice the amount of times you mentioned the words 'time' and 'effort'. See, it's not all about one's inability to fix his car, or whatever - it's because its undesireable to do so. Oh, you can argue that learning to operate a car's onboard pc, to be able to fix it, is a lot more difficult than learning basic engine mechanics, and so on, but it's not impossible, and if people truly had the will to do it, like 'in them olden days', then they would still do it. Thing is, people today have a lot less time to waste in the comfort of their own garage trying (and possibly failing) to fix something, that could be handled by someone else. And quite honestly, I don't see a problem with that. Yeah it's a lot more expensive, but at least now people can make a living doing that, and you have people who actually specialize and are a lot more competent in certain areas, than your average joe will ever be; and who will guarantee a good job, while you go about your daily routine. Thus removing an entire layer of work that needs be done, when something happens, and freeing up a lot of your time, so, yeah, goodbye and farewell I say to this 'do it yourself' generation. | |
Also As we venture towards an all service based economy, expect the handy man to fade from existence or as we know it. | |
I put the fucker on jackstands and make it work again. I was born with a combo wrench in my hand, and I will die with one there. I will learn the new systems, I will adapt to the repair methods necessary by new tech. I refuse to be a slave to labor charges, and the day I cannot fix my own stuff is the day my live ceases.
There's the first problem. Minivans are the most vile, hateful, disposable shitheaps to ever grace public highways. They should be banned in every first-world country until carmakers resolve those issues.
And whichever designer thought this was a good idea should never work in the automotive industry again.
Debatable.
lolwut?
This is true. Better oils let me take my '85 Ford to 5,000 mile oil changes without harming the engine. 300K and going strong!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA This is the funniest shit I've heard all week. Modern cars are build-to-warranty. Carmakers know people just toss them aside as soon as the warranty and/or the loan is done, usually whichever is first. Therefore they don't care about making the car reliable beyond that point. They run perfectly for 5-10 years and up to about 150,000 miles. Then they just fall apart, are condemned to the scrapyard, and the cycle repeats. Getting a modern car to 200,000 miles and 20 years is harder than it was 20 years ago, where all you had to do was keep the maintenance up and not run into anything and it was all but guaranteed. I have a 1985 Ford F150 with an I6 and manual. Never been rebuilt. It's as simple as the earth, and it still runs like a dream 26 years and 300,000 miles after it was built. It's not alone either, there's hundreds of thousands of 7th gen F150s still roaming the lands, and for good reason. These trucks were built right. They were built to last. 2012 F150? I'll be fuckin' surprised if there's even half as many of them on the road as there are 80-86s come ten years.
When I'm 40 I fully expect to make people's eyes go as big as dinnerplates when I fix my shit myself.
Yes, you can. These new cars may be complex and poorly designed but they're still DIY fixable. Get a laptop, an OBD-II --> USB cable, and some software. Add to that the standard toolset and you're golden.
I think it's a load of shit to be perfectly honest. It makes me not want to buy a new car. Why would I? My 26 year old one runs like a top and it costs ten bucks and an hour of my time to fix it when it does go wrong. They're losing money they otherwise would have. Also, I'd like to point out how NOBODY OFFERS A GODDAMN MANUAL TRANSMISSION PICKUP TRUCK IN THE US! YTBHKDTNBHDLITYBMDYLISBTBLEI | |
You listed one thing, cars, as a defense for killing the entire mind-set of fix-it-yourself. One thing does not a valid argument make. Cars can't be self-fixed as easily, big flipping deal. That makes no claims about the mindset or about any other possible things besides cars. This sounds more like "OMG, why are car companies being dicks with their new designs!" rather then any claim about any generation knowledge or cultural traits. | |
Interestingly enough, my family has consistently refused to change for this. My uncle built a full shop on his property and has a tool set for everything. Need a new injection system put in your 2012 Honda? It's a lot of work, but if you're willing to hang out, help him, and pay for the parts, sure. I own two vehicles that are older than me (one of which was built in 1974 and gets better gas mileage than a Prius. Progress? 1L, 55mpg, carbureted), and do most of my own work on 'em. What I can't figure out, my brother or my uncle (both of whom have extensive education in automotive maintenance, which helps) help me with, and I learn. We're bad consumers, I know. If every family in the states was like mine, the auto industry here would have died in the 80s... but aftermarket parts would still be going stronger than ever. | |
For every pro, there is a con. | |
What you should keep in mind here is that new cars produce more horsepower from less gasoline. Meaning more bang for your buck, especially in these times when gas is so expensive. Those "evil computers" aren't there just to make the company money, but to make your car more efficient, safer, and to extend it's lifespan. The '69 Dodge Charger had a fuel economy of maybe 9MPG (on the highway), if you were lucky. The new Charger, which has about the same HP and weight, has been reported to get as high as 28mpg. Most people would agree that a MPG rating with more than one digit is nice, and worth a little extra money when repairs are needed. The fuel efficiency craze is pretty bad right now, people will fork out 10 or 20 grand extra to get that hybrid, then drive it on mostly highways, which is just stupid. The car "enthusiasts" will sit there and piss and moan about how onboard computers took the fun out of cars, and make it too complicated to do anything to them, along with automatic transmissions (even though the new autos and semi-autos are better at shifting that you are, and more fuel efficient, trololol), but the fact is that things change. People are just slow to accept it. I for one am happy that we're getting better and better tech, more power for less gas? Sounds good to me. I agree that oil filter placements can be a huge piss off, though. | |
Usually, the con in ease of maintenance is difficulty of use. Easiest way to not sell something in the US nowadays? Make it less than completely user-friendly. If there's a learning curve to use a product in the US, people don't want it anymore. As a culture, we've just become that lazy. | |
Actually a HUGE amount of what people take to mechanics can be done yourself. All you can't test is the diagnostic codes, and if for some reason you need those codes, for a small fee you can get that report done and then do the work yourself for most repairs. | |
I don't cars. (sic) I'll fix my own computer, and do rudimentary fixes on household objects, but I simply cannot cars (still sic). | |
The generation of 'fix it yourself' people isn't dead, or dieing. It's just taking a vacation for a while. People of recent generations are throwing things away too easily, getting other people to fix things for them, and being lazy about getting things done. It'll get bad enough to the point that people will have to take another look at how they're living, and fix it. You will eventually see a gradual shift of this as time passes. If you want to help the matter, then learn to fix things yourself and pass it on to your offspring and relative's offspring. I mean, I made butter the other day. Crazy, I know! What when I could just go to the store and buy some. It tastes so much better, and I can control the salt content. Even throw some herbs in there if I want. I used the run-off buttermilk for pancakes. When I described this to friends, they thought I was insane. Why? It's because I wanted to know how. I never learned it as a kid and was curious. I already found out how to make wine and yogurt. Cheese and jam are next. I also use to do my own repairs to my '92 Geo. The only thing I couldn't prevent was the heavy onset of rust on the frame. My current car is a bit more complicated and 'high tech', so I'm having a bit of trouble learning it. What I wouldn't give for a brand new clunker. One without computers and with easy-to-figure-out sensors. | |
I think that is a pretty cynical view point, car companies making things harder to DIY so they can charge for new parts ... especially since you can buy 3rd party and custom parts for cars. I think it is just about improving cars in a lot of cases. Like why have a foot of space between the block and the chassis when you can make the car smaller? Things have to be taken into a garage so the ECU you can be reset 'cos the ECU controls everything these days, which makes cars better. Instead of you dumping loads of crap out of your car lambda sensor switches on and off constantly to reduce emissions, how would you fix that at home? Of course some of it is to make money out of you but you can always buy these parts yourself, just on top of your tool set buy an engine crane and a ECU reader. (some of what I have said might be wrong ... been awhile since I was in college) | |
meh that is debatable... especially when you consider how much training is needed (to do it RIGHT and with good craftsmanship) and the sheer amount of random (and very expensive) tools... I have a ton of mechanics in my family and the sheer amount of repairs they do because some asshat tried to do it themselves from a book without any proper training or the right tools and broke it even worse is staggering one of the best was a guy who was getting the entire front end of his car replaced and had put his kid in the hospital because he did his own brakes by following a DIY manual and didn't bleed them properly.. it wasn't because the manual was incorrect or poorly written it was just because he lacked the experience to follow it right I did framing and concrete for a while and saw the same crap... I got just as many jobs fixing what homeowners broke or did horribly while trying to do it themselves than any normal new jobs | |
My family fixes almost all house home and car problems ourselves :S | |
I think it's necessary and entirely a good thing. Cars back in the day were not very safe things. 40 years ago the maximum speed was set at 60-70mph for a reason, because the brakes, the steering, the suspension, all of it wasn't good enough to withstand any faster speeds. Modern cars can go to a hundred and still be pretty damn safe, as long as the driver is good as well. This is only made possible by the inclusion of all those systems you can't fix. So yeah, some of it might be to maximise profits, which can you blame them actually? If you don't make profits your company goes under, but also to maximise safety and the driving experience. You can't simplify it down to 'money, money, money' because it's not about money. It's like saying that you could fix your own GameBoy Colour back in the day if you had the know-how, but would you trade in your PlayStation 1, 2, 3, XBox and 360, Wii, Sega Genesis, GameCube just so you could fix it yourself? (Please Note: If you answer yes to this question you are an idiot.) I'll take a better, safer, nicer and overall better in every single conceivable way driving experience over a rattly hunk of crap that I have to fix myself fom parts I found on a scrapyard actually. | |
One thing to remember with non removable batteries is that you can increase the battery capacity by doing so. Apple reported a 40% increase when they switched to unibody construction because they didn't have to install a door, locking mechanism, physical sides to the battery shell, etc. Imagine if the iPad had a removable battery and got 60% of the battery life it does... no one would be happy. | |
That's no different than 20 years ago. All professions make lots from fixing other people's mistakes. The only new addition is that the computer is more complex than it used to be. | |
I must agree that it's not universal and there are a lot of long-lasting things out there, but it gets worse and worse. | |
and people fucked it up 20 years ago before it got even more complex and required even more tools... hell people were fucking it up by doing it themselves in greater numbers before computers were even added to cars... it's why there are less DIY's now... some people actually wised up and realized it's easier and cheaper in the long run to let someone who has an actually clue do it... if you want to learn a field then by all means spent the time and energy to learn it properly... but the average person has no interest or time to especially when there is a perfectly easy and viable alternative that pretty much always produces superior results... hell you can also grow/raise ALL your own food and technically do most other things you pay for but almost no one does because for the average person it is pretty much a waste of time and very inefficient compared to just paying for it and doing what you actually NEED to do to make live your life | |
You admit cars are much better (durable) than before. If that takes an onboard computer that you yourself cannot fix, I guess you can considder it a dual edged sword. But to me it's just a good innovation. And this issue has ALWAYS been around; in medieval times you would see a specialist for stuff we now easily can do ourselves at home. This is because technology in general is hard to fully grasp, no matter what the level it is at. For example, I can program and make any computer do whatever I want. I can rebuild it and build new ones no problem. But can I invent an entire new CPU from scratch? Nope. Maybe *everyone* can do that on the Enterprise... but then they'll be looking for a genius with a massive laboratory who can build a new warpcore that's faster than the current one... Bottom line: I can't fix a car, but I can fix any PC problem. Guess I'll put that money towards car repairs, like once they paid the town witch grain to cure their lepracy... ? And specifically about car manufacturers making them hard to fix on purpose: | |
So what, your father was lacking the needed tool. A tools who's need is screamingly obvious? This is the cars companies fault? Smack him upside the head and tell him to get an OBD-II scanner. Having a car with an on board computer and not having one of those, is like bitching about not having a basic wrench set. Really. | |
Two things: - First, risking losing the warranty? Yeah, right. - Second, cars even have a plastic cover under the bonnet. You're not supposed to mess around with the engine. | |
It's funny but capitalism, when you think about it, is both extremely efficient and extremely wasteful. It's much quicker and easier to throw old stuff into a dump and buy a new one than simply fix whatever was wrong with it. It's the price of progress I guess. | |
Jesus freakin' christ, is there anything that wasn't better in the old days? This is all I see on the internet these days. And the sad thing is that most people who say these things are at most 25, which means they didn't even get to live the "good ol' days". What the hell internet? Why so whiney? | |
back in the good ol' days we had to walk 20 miles, in the snow, barefoot, uphill both ways to complain and whine about something to someone... pfft lazy internet generation | |
| Pages PREV 1 2 3 NEXT | |
it seems to be one of the products/flaws of our broken capitalism (aka: I-must-win-and-everybody-else-must-die-preferably-horribly - capitalism): the product that is brought by the common customer must preferably:
- be aesthetically pleasing (no matter what the product is actually used for)
- be easy to use (even a moron should be able to use it WITHOUT ANY MANUAL OF SORTS)
- not allow the customer to "break" the product by accident/proper usage in itself and therefore limit the products to "easy to use" features. Generous "dumbing down" as deemed necessary. (see computer operating systems)
- be easy/cheap to produce (cheapest material and cheapest workers)
- have the highest possibly acceptable price (production cost is absolutely negligible)
- have the lowest possibly acceptable quality (together with cheap materials and minimal use thereof)
- must break quickly after expiration of warranty so the customer is forced to buy a new version.
- no repairing whatsoever, neither through service nor by the customer. (repair workers are expensive, as is shipping single parts of a product around the world. it is cheaper to just send a completely new version of the product.)
net win:
more money :D
net loss:
insane waste of ressources/material. (plus no recycling, of course. See plastic)
unsatisfied customers. (because stuffs break. all the time.)
slow stagnation due to lack of REAL improvement outside of aesthetics. (so customers buy more shiny stuff)
MUCH less money in the long run due to degenerating economy.
in short: almost perfectly optimized to milk more money, while sacrificing everything else, including the base the company is standing on.
*facepalm*
EDIT: I know most people know this - just felt like making a list